CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
THE PROJECT ON:
SUPREME COURT’S APPROACH IN
UOI v. H.S. DHILLON (1971 2 SCC 779)
SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF B.A, LL.B (Hons.) THIRD SEMESTER
10th NOVEMBER 2014
SUBMITTED TO- SUBMITTED BY-
Mr. Krishan Mahajan GROUP NO. XVI-
Professor of Law 131156- Shraddha Upadhyay
RGNUL, Punjab 131166- Manish Sharma 131176- Gautam Bhadadra 131186- Pallakshi Pushkar 131196- Khushdeep Kaur Chauhan 12812- Ibadat Singh Randhawa
Acknowledgement
The members are extremely thankful for guidance provided by Mr. Krishan Mahajan (Professor of Law, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab). We are grateful to him for giving us the opportunity to express our understanding on the topic: Supreme Court’s Approach In UOI V. H.S. Dhillon (1971 2 SCC 779). We also owe our honest appreciation to college staff at library and computer labs for co-operatively assisting in the process of researching the content and other clerical work.
Sincere thanks to our seniors for guiding us on the presentation and formatting part of the project without which the proper arrangement of the content would have
Bibliography: BOOKS REFERRED Ali Mehdi, Residuary Legislative Powers in India: Retrospect and Prospects, Deep and Deep Publications, 1990 R.M. Dawson, Government of Canada(1964) CASES CITED Att. Gen. For India v. Amratlal Prajivandas AIR 1994 SC 2179 / (1994) 5 SCC 54 Attorney-General for Ontario v Rajamundry Electric supply Co. v. State of Andhra, (1954) SCR 779 S Finance Act, 1969 The Government of India Act, 1935 Wealth Act, 1957 WEB SOURCES