Preview

Constitutional Separation Of Powers: The Constitution Of The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitutional Separation Of Powers: The Constitution Of The United States
Constitutional Separation of Powers The Constitution of the United States vests the power of the government in three coequal branches -- the executive, legislative, and judicial branches -- and establishes a system of checks and balances so that no one branch can become too powerful. This separation of powers helps to allow each of the three branches the ability to work together to protect the individual rights of both free citizens and offenders while also preventing a single branch from taking unilateral action. The constitutional separation of powers can be seen effectively protecting the rights of citizens and offenders through the guarantee of due process. The executive branch is expected to enforce the laws created by the legislative branch; however, the guarantee of due process means that the executive branch does not have the right to immediately punish an individual. An individual must be brought to justice through the judicial system. This is due …show more content…
The executive branch must gain approval from the judicial branch before being granted a search warrant. This provides a check on the executive branch preventing it from conducting unreasonable searches without probable cause. This is also due process. The laws which establish the criteria for gaining a search warrant are initially written by the legislative branch, which helps to create another check and balance to the system.
Strictly speaking in terms of prisoners, the constitution dictates how the legislature must provide certain policies for carrying out due process in the corrections environment. The legislature also writes rules for how prisoners are to be treated. The executive branch, or the correctional system, must carry out these laws through various procedures. The judicial branch then holds the power of review to ensure that procedures enacted by the legislature and carried out by the executive branch are in line with the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The term “separation of powers” refers to the three branches of government; the legislative, executive and judicial branches as set up by our founding fathers in the U.S. Constitution. The principle of separation of powers had already been given a fair trail in most state constitutions and had proved sound.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of powers came from the founding fathers, who were heavily influenced by the French philosopher Charles Secondat when drafting the constitution. The United States’ federal government is split into three branches. These three branches are legislative, executive, and judicial branches. In order to give each branch has a specific job to do in the government. This system of checks and balances was made in order to give equal power to each branch so this way one branch isn’t over ruling the others, which will be a corrupted government.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The separation of powers is the main underlying principle of the US Constitution whereby political power is distributed amongst the three branches of government – the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. The branches act both independently and interdependently. The idea was originally of French political thinker Baron de Montesquieu, it was then incorporated by the Founding Fathers into the 1787 codified document. The principle was adopted by the Founding Fathers due to their fear of totalitarianism. Montesquieu argued for separation of powers in his book L’Esprit de Lois, where he stated that separation of powers will avoid tyranny ‘When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person…there can be no liberty.’ On the contrary to the US, the UK’s powers are fused; the Prime Minister is both the executive and part of the legislature. In the US system there is also a separation of personnel, this means that no person can be a member of more than one branch at the same time. When Senator Al Gore was elected vice-president in 1992, he had to resign from the Senate. Similarly, in 2008, Barack Obama too had to resign from the Senate. In this sense, the three branches are fully disconnected.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Separation of powers and the supremacy clause. The separation of powers the Constitution provides a system of checks and balances between the Legislative, Executive, and judicial branches of government. The Constitution also divides power between the federal and state and local governments. Supremacy clause establishes that the Constitution, all federal statutes, and U.S. treaties are “the supreme law of the land.” The distinction of the separation of powers is also reflected in the fact that certain functions must not be exercised by…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of powers is a doctrine that is often considered to balance or place at the development of the United States of America Constitution and the constitution of the United States is known as the supreme law. This doctrine maintains that liberty is best conserved if the three functions of government which are legislation, law enforcement, and judgement are organized in different hands. Baron de Montesquieu's in The Spirit of the Laws once stated that "There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or body of magistrates … [or] if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers. " The purpose of this body is to safeguard that no one is able to attain…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    British constitutional principle of judicial independence Convention tracking its statutory origin and was enacted in 1701, Act of Settlement. The Act formally recognized the independence of the judiciary, the main content, secure the right to use qualification subject to good behaviour , the removal of the judge (an address of both houses of parliament), and also the establishment of an appropriate mechanism. Convention in doing so given a set of legislative handle reiterated that the cornerstone of the separation of powers, judicial independence doctrine important pillar one.…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Legislature, or law making function, which covers actions such as the enactment of rules for society. The Executive, or law applying function, which covers actions taken to maintain or implement the law, defend the state, and conduct internal policies. Finally, the Judiciary, or law enforcing function, which is the determining of civil disputes and the punishing of criminals by deciding issues of fact and applying the law. These functions of Government should be carried out by separate persons, or bodies and that each branch should carry out its own function. For example, the Legislature should not judge nor should the Executive make laws. The Legislature, Executive and the Judiciary should also all have equal legal…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Separation of Powers

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Davenport S. & Parker D.’s statement (as above) explores the concept of the ‘separation of powers’ doctrine and how this is embedded within the ‘Commonwealth Constitution’. It also states that Australia is a ‘constitutional democracy’. To address the meaning of this statement it is important to separate the statement into individual questions. What is a constitutional democracy? What is the doctrine of separation of powers? And lastly, what are the three parts that make up the separation of powers doctrine, and how does this operate in Australia? The following essay will provide a brief overview of these questions.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The doctrine of the separation of powers is one extending back hundreds of years. It is a doctrine, which has had a significant impact on the Australian constitutional system, and is consequently reflected within it. However, this essay argues that the doctrine has, to a degree, been tempered by the recognition of responsible government, despite its obvious reflection in the Cth Constitution. This essay will also discuss the separation of judicial power principles as part of the overall doctrine, and the significant impact it has on limiting and regulation the role of the judiciary. The issues of an elected judiciary and of parliamentary privilege will also be discussed. The doctrine of the separation of powers is reflected in the Australian constitution law systems to a significant degree. This essay will focus on the Cth Constitutional system primarily, as this is where the operation of the doctrine is very clear.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First, as a power regulator, rule of law has two functions: it limits government arbitrariness and power abuse, and it makes the government more rational and its policies more intelligent. In contrast, a key aspect of rule of law is "limitation;" i.e., rule of law puts limits on the discretionary power of the government, including the power to changes laws. Second, if the government is to be restricted in its exercise of discretion, the government has to follow legal procedures that are pre-fixed and pre-announced. For example, in constitutional and criminal law, there is a prohibition on "ex post facto" laws, that is, no one should be punished for a crime not previously defined in law. In other words, the government cannot simply define a new crime and apply the new…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Separation of Powers exists to protect the natural rights of the people. It was created by Baron de Montesquieu during the Enlightenment and used in the Declaration of Independence by the Framers. The Separation of Powers is a division of government into three branches which prevents one branch from gaining too much power. The Separation of Powers, used by the Founding Fathers, is just as important today as when the written.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The major objective of this essay is to defend the assertion that separation of power in Zambia is relative. This essay will begin by giving a brief description of the concept Separation of Powers. executive, legislature and the judiciary. Thereafter, a Main Body shall provide a detailed discussion over the assertion after which a conclusion will be given to summarise the discussion.…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Parliament has the power to make laws according to the provisions of the Constitution and the Judiciary is independent and there can be no intervention with its functions either by the Executive or by the Legislature. The power of judicial review is vested with the Supreme Court and the High Courts and they can declare any law unconstitutional passed by The Parliament or the Legislature if it seems to be violative of any provision of the Constitution. Therefore, Separation of Powers, though, is present in India but to what extent it is followed is in question…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    separation of powers

    • 4098 Words
    • 17 Pages

    I would also like to acknowledge and extend my heartfelt gratitude to my teacher Mr. Subradipta Sarkar for his guidance throughout.…

    • 4098 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Separation of powers

    • 1833 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The idea of Separation of Powers suggests that governance of the State should not fall solely under one organ of the State which could be identified as the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary. Aristotle in his Politics submitted this theory but the most famous version was being suggested by Montesquieu in ‘De L'Espirit des Lois'. His arguments indicate that there were three functions of government, Legislative as the law-making body, Executive as the law-applying body and Judiciary as the Law-Enforcing body. Early findings indicates that Montesquieu theory was unreachable since it is almost impossible for United Kingdom(UK) to have full Separation Powers of the three organs.…

    • 1833 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays