Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Constructive Criticism

Good Essays
385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constructive Criticism
Linguistics professor and best-selling author, Deborah Tannen explains how “The Argument Culture” wants us to accept that by creating conflict is the best way of getting things done with an adversarial disposition. An essay taken from her book, The Argument Culture: Moving from Debate to Dialogue (1988), Tannen expresses her views on having adversarial dialogue between two sides has weakened communication in our society. Although, we live in a society where we are free to express our conflicts openly, Tannen argues that as a society we should seek to find “constructive” ways of settling disputes and differences. In setting out to find truths, Tannen states that we “assume that every issue has two sides” and by having this assumption we begin to “doubt the existence” of any facts. With diminishing face to face communication and increasing use of technology, Tannen believes that these factors “isolate people in a bubble” while the argument culture makes a “defining impact” on society. By adding more dialogue to debates and not to think in twos, Tannen advises we should use our “imaginations and ingenuity” to explore truth and knowledge.
After reading this essay, my understanding of adding more dialogue to a debate is clearer than ever before. What I like best about Deborah Tannen’s essay is how she gives specific details on the effects of having an “adversarial frame of mind” impacts our daily lives. Tannen supports her claim about how the argument culture is shaping our lives by giving an example regarding the Holocaust that has long been a part of our history, but is now being questioned of its existence because we “assume there must be another side”. I believe that mass media promotes adversarial disposition by creating conflict between groups in order to control society’s opinion and beliefs. According to Bryant & Oliver (2009), “Mass media transmit the ideas, values, norms, attitudes, and behavior that socialize and construct the social reality of those who use them for a wide variety of reasons”. Traditional news broadcast reported on local and national events and gave objective views in the commentary segments. In today’s news broadcast, mainstream media has created a new format as Feldman (2011) noted as being, “…in favor of a more overly opinionated presentation style” (p.1). As society relies on information on important issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Is535 Course Project

    • 2779 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Walton, D. N. (2007). Media Argumentation : Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 2779 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Tannen is a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University. Her study of language and how it is utilized has led her to have many books on the “Best-Selling” List. In her book, “The Argument Culture”, Deborah Tannen takes a closer look at how we as a society have come to view arguing/debating as a normal form of communication. Our inability to look at more than two views at a time, has led us to limit the potential conversations that could easily take place. In this essay, Professor Tannen takes a shot at making us believe that being in an “Argument-culture” is not the best thing for us as a whole. She wants us to see that it is truly a problem but that it can be fixed by following her advice. Tannen feels that everything…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Argument Culture” is a persuasive essay written by Professor Deborah Tannen. As a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University, Tannen experience in language leads her to write many books in this field. Tannen uses “The Argument Culture” essay to persuade her audience that this society’s way of looking at debate encourages an “adversarial frame of mind” (Tannen, 305). Three of Tannen’s main points include; polarized views in the news, the use of “war metaphors’ by media to catch the readers eye, and even in the language mankind uses in everyday life. Tannen’s essay also includes different ways to look at these each of these situations that may help reduce the debate language that this society uses every day.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every person has their own way of thinking, believing, and generally speaking, this will eventually conflict with the views and values of others. In order to get our point across or to find out what other people believe and why, we will need to negotiate to reach an understanding. Mary Roach writes about some personal experiences she had with arguing in her essay "Meet the Bickersons," which humorously accounts her trials with relationships. To be sure, there are many benefits and also disadvantages from arguing; knowing what to say, how to say it, and when can be the deciding factor.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Auburn

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An argument is an attempt to resolve a set of two or more conflicting assertions through an appeal to reason. In an argument, one not only acknowledges the facts, but also explores ones own ideas. In short, an Argument is the process of finding a solution through the dialectic exchange of ideas. In the article, Rodgers sets up an over powering but nonetheless effective Argument.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. In order to argue effectively, the arguer must first set a personal goal, and then play an active role in setting the goals of the “audience”.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of this book is Howard Fineman, one of the most trusted political journalists that discusses the American debate of the 13 arguments. One question Howard proposes to the reader would be, who is a person? Still till this day, us Americans are still trying to determine the answer to that. Every generation is evolving into something greater than it was before. According to the Declaration of Independence, it believes that a person is ‘everyone’, but that it took some time to figure this all out through many Civil Right Acts and other movements. The purpose for Howard to write this story was to ‘cut through’ the chaos during each day. The themes within this book go along with the everyday debates; whether through the various types of newspaper arguments such as the Daily Kos of even the Drudge Report. The position that Howard is trying to portray to his audience is that as a journalist, he is displaying the inside scoop of the behind the scenes government. Informing all the people that debate and argument is actually okay. If no one was able to debate or argue, then the world would be boring. It keeps the people on their toes and interested with what is about to be said next. From earlier, debating gives freedom of speech for all, and will continue to give freedom of speech for the years to come. With this, I agree…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In classrooms, conflict is necessary to achieve student abilities to devise their own perspective and form different judgement on a topic which helps gain knowledge. In the essay “Other Voices, Other Rooms, by Gerald Graff, a professor of English and education writes about “the chance to try on a variety of clashing ideas, to see what they feel like, is one of the most exciting opportunities an education can provide”, which is known as conflict in a classroom. While keeping a degree of pluralism and diversity between subject, teacher should have a level of communication when presenting material. The outcomes are rewarding for student who go to a “university with already developed skills.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though not directly regarded as a prime example of an argumentative tool, acknowledging the opposing viewpoint in a controversial topic adds persuasion. Kristof gives studies for why Obama was at a disadvantage because of his race during the 2007 election season, but also states that it could be the other way around. “It appeals to some whites as a demonstration of their open-mindedness, and it wins him overwhelming black votes and turnout.” Yet again, more ethos is added to the author. A sign of intelligence and open-mindedness is seeing other views beside one’s one, and that is exactly what Kristof…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To truly win in on the side one stands on, the idea must be put into an argumentative state, and blown away. When discussed and realizing the true nature behind an idea, it begins to lose its…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argument is an important activity in the advancement of knowledge and society. There are many ways to express your self in this world, art, music, writing, speaking, etc. Within those things are countless approaches to getting your point across, or defending your side of an argument. Some of these methods are more effective at showing others that your way is the right way.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    tannen

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tannen’s “Fighting for Our Lives” touches on how our culture is seen as an argument culture where there are two distinct sides to an argument seen as being either right or wrong, without a middle ground. The argument culture, Tannen explains, urges us to approach the world in an adversarial frame of mind: the best way to approach any sort of idea, dialogue, or conversation is to set it up as a debate. This tactic does not solve any residing problems, by ignoring what the other person has to say and assuming your opinion is better than them is not going to resolve any issues.“In the argument culture, criticism, attack, or opposition are the predominant if not the only ways of responding to ideas.” According to Tannen we battle for top dog, strive to be the best, and to prove that we are right whether that means to criticize or manipulate words around in order for a feel of self-satisfaction.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Are Everywhere

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Now that I have finished reading the chapter, argument has a lot more meaning than just plain old disagreement. There are two types of argument, traditional and consensual arguments.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world today, the word “argument” is used on a daily basis and usually carries a bad meaning. In fact, the word is used so much that people often mistaken it’s true meaning. According to the book Writing Arguments by John Ramage, John Bean and June Johnson, there is no universally accepted definition of “argument.” The meaning of the term is rather complex, and it has been remained a controversial issue of philosophers and rhetoricians over the centuries (2). Because of the complexity of the word, we need to examine three important points in order to understand what “argument” truly meant: the misconceptions about the meaning of argument, the features of argument, and the relationship of argument to the problem of truth.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They Say I Say

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moreover, there are always two sides to an argument, and the occasional neutral zone. Arguments seem to consist of each side trying to persuade the other to accept their viewpoints and prove they are right. They usually start with someone provoking another with their beliefs and the rest just becomes a verbal war. In school, the traditional five-paragraph essays are used to develop a position and support the that stance with evidence; however, it is not considered an argumentative paper because there is not a opposite side provoking the writer. It is not only how you prove your views, but how you can identify and challenge the contradicting arguments. There needs to be a matador that aggravates the bull. There has to be a "they say" in order for your argument to be understood. The content of your side would still be heard, but the purpose of stating it would be unclear. So the "they say" is used as the foundation which the "I say" is built upon, and therefore using others' voices to…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays