Preview

Controversial Supreme Court Case Roper V. Simmons

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1411 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Controversial Supreme Court Case Roper V. Simmons
The Death Penalty is a controversial topic on its own. However, if you add the possibility of a minor receiving the death penalty it gets even more interesting. The Supreme Court case of Roper v. Simmons was a perfect example of that. Roper v. Simmons presented the Supreme Court with two questions: 1) whether or not the execution of those who were sixteen or seventeen at the time of a crime is cruel and unusual punished and 2) does is violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment. The main audience for this particular case is the general American population, and specifically affects the juvenile population.

Christopher Simmons, seven months shy of his 18th birthday, planned and implemented the murder of an innocent woman. Descriptions of the murder are thoroughly chilling. Reports exposed that Simmons and an accomplice bound the woman in tape and dropped her off a bridge, drowning her in the waters below. Simmons later confessed to the crime and even participated in a videotaped reenactment of it. If he had been an adult at the time of the murder, Simmons’ case would not raise any constitutional questions. But due to his age, the issue before the court was whether the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments allowed the United States to “execute a juvenile offender who was older then 15 but younger than 18 when he committed a capital crime.” Justice Kennedy affirmed the previous ruling in the Missouri Supreme Court. As a result, Simmons could not be considered for the death penalty due to his age, and his sentence remained at life in prison without parole.

Justice Kennedy went on to say, “it is the court’s reasoning that makes this case controversial, due to evolving standards of decency” (ROPER v. SIMMONS, (03-633) 543 U.S. 551 2005) since the ruling in Stanford v. Kentucky (1989), the Court has grounds to rule against the juvenile death penalty. In the Stanford ruling, the Court held that juveniles under the age of 15 could not be executed, “due to



References: American Psychological Association. Roper. D.P. v. Simmons, C. (2004). Brief from the Psychological Association, & Missouri Psychological Association. as Amici Curiae supporting respondent July 2004. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from http://www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/roper.pdf ATKINS v. VIRGINIA, 536 U.S. 320 (2002) Retrieved May 20, 2011 from FindLaw: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/va-supreme-court/1427407.html ROPER v. SIMMONS, (03-633) 543 U.S. 551 (2005) 112 S. W. 3d 397, affirmed Retrieved May 20, 2011 from http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-633.ZD1.html STANFORD v. KENTUCKY, 492 U.S. 361 (1989) Retrieved May 20, 2011 from FindLaw: http://laws.findlaw.com/us/492/361.html THOMPSON v. OKLAHOMA, 487 U.S. 815 (1988) Retrieved May 20, 2011 from FindLaw: http://laws.findlaw.com/us/487/815.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Roper (2005) is a United States Supreme court ruling related to capital punishment for juveniles under the age of 18. The case stands for the proposition that it is unconstitutional to sentence to death juveniles who are charged with murder before attaining the age of 18 (Roper, 2005). In this case, Christopher Simmons, a 17-year old boy, was convicted and sentenced to death in 1993 for robbing a woman in her home then afterwards kidnapping her and throwing her off a bridge to her death (Roper, 2005). This sentencing was followed by a series of appeals to federal and state courts with each being rejected.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roper vs Simmons case all began in 1993, when Christopher Simmons was charged with burglary, stealing, kidnapping and first degree murder. Due to these charges he was being tried as an adult and resulted in him being sentenced to death. After repeatedly trying to appeal the case to state and federal courts, which led nowhere. In 2002, they finally decided to reconsider the case due to the Atkins v. Virginia case. This is then when Simmon filed a new petition, arguing that the reasoning of the Atkins case established that the Constitution prohibits the execution of a juvenile who was under 18 when the crime was committed. The Supreme Court agreed to Simmons’s petition due to the fact that imposing the death penalty for a crime committed…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court had ruled that juveniles who committed a crime such as murder, could not be sentenced to life in prison because it is violating the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In the supreme court decision, I agree that it is harsh and should not be allowed for a minor to serve life in prison, even if murder is committed. The decision is agreeable due to the severe punishment on someone young whose life is ruined over the decision they made. The information on a minor is misleading it masks a juvenile as a brutal killer is society's eyes. These statements should be brought to the people who are disagreeing with the court decision, and prove that these minors do not deserve an adult sentence with life in prison.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Simmons was written by Justice Kennedy, and was joined by Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Stevens, and Souter. Their opinion was guided by the courts then recent decision in Atkins v. Virginia on capital punishment of the mentally retarded, as well as their decision from 1989 in the case of Stanford v. Kentucky on capital punishment of juveniles age 16 and older. Justice Kennedy explained that a national consensus had formed in opposition to sentencing offenders to death who were under eighteen years old at the time of their offense (Counsel of Record, 2005). This claim was supported by observations that eighteen states did not allow capital punishment for juveniles, and twelve states had banished capital punishment entirely. Also noted was the fact that not a single state had lowered its age of execution below age eighteen since the 1989 decision of Stanford v. Kentucky, and five other states had actually raised their age of execution to at least age eighteen. Finally, in states that still allowed for juvenile execution, its practice was extremely unusual (Counsel of Record, 2005). Justice Kennedy elaborated on the consensus against using the death penalty for minors by noting that it grew much slower than the consensus found in Atkins v. Virginia. He explained that the rate was not as important as the consistency of the direction of change (Counsel of Record, 2005). All of this established an understanding that standards had evolved…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roper vs. Simmons was one of the few cases in almost two decades to address whether it’s constitutional under the eighth and fourteenth amendments to execute a juvenile offender who was over the age of fifteen but under the age of eighteen when he/she committed a capital crime. In 1988, Thompson vs. Oklahoma banned the execution of minors who were sixteen years of age when they committed a capital crime. Another case, Stanford vs. Kentucky (1989), divided the court which eventually rejected that the Constitution excludes capital punishment for minors of this age group. Roper vs. Simmons overturned the decision in Stanford vs. Kentucky. Only seven countries in the past century have favored execution of minors convicted of capital crimes: Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia,…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Virginia (2002) when the Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional to execute the mentally retarded, there has been a shift in the use of the juvenile death penalty that reflects society’s “evolving standards of decency.” A national consensus has developed since Stanford v. Kentucky (1989) in which the majority of states do not support the use of the death penalty for juveniles. Currently, 30 states prohibit the juvenile death penalty, and 12 of those states have banned the death penalty completely. In addition, since 1989, five states that previously allowed the juvenile death penalty have banned its use, either through legislation or through judicial…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christopher Simmons was convicted and sentenced to death for capital crimes he committed when he was 17 years old. At the time of his conviction the Court’s ruling in Stanford v. Kentucky held that the 8th Amendment did not proscribe juvenile between the ages of 16 and 18 from being sentenced to death. In 2002 the Supreme Court ruling in the Atkins v. Virginia barred the use of the death penalty on mentally retarded offenders due to “evolving standards of decency” which put them in a class that is “categorically less culpable than the average criminal. In response to the above ruling, Simmons petitioned for postconviction relief on the basis that the reasoning in the Atkins decision applies to minors. His petition was heard by the…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Essay

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While it is not necessarily talked about that often, the death penalty is still widely used in many countries. In the supreme court case Roper v. Simmons, an individual of age 17 committed premeditated murder, as well as breaking and entering and vehicular theft. Simmons wanted Roper to be sentenced to death, but they appealed because Roper was legally a minor at the time of the crime. When the case came to the court it was a 5-4 decision that ruled the execution of minors was unconstitutional, which was unexpected because 15 years prior the case Stanford v. Kentucky the supreme court ruled that it was constitutional to execute individuals in between the ages of 18 and 15. Three years prior to Roper v. Simmons the case Atkins v. Virginia ruled that the mentally disabled cannot be executed due to the 8th Amendment. The 8th Amendment and its ideals have changed drastically over the course of history.…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Garner v. Tennessee

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Tennessee statute under authority of which police officer fired fatal shot was unconstitutional because it authorized use of deadly force against apparently unarmed, non dangerous fleeing suspect;…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the nation have different views on the subject of juvenile justice. Some believe that despite the children's age, they should still be tried as an adult if a serious crime is committed. On the other hand, some believe children should not be tried as adult even if they commit a rather serious crime. I firmly that these children should not be sentenced to life in prison despite the serious crime that they have committed and should have another shot at life when their brain is fully developed.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hawkes, A. (2010, February 16). Keeping your less lethal options open. Retrieved January 31, 2013, from PolicOne.com: http://www.policeone.com/pc_print.asp?vid=2001750…

    • 5211 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will examine the history of the Juvenile Court system and its intended purposes, the history of capital punishment being used against minors, court decisions both in limiting capital punishment for youthful offenders, as well as upholding states rights to sentence juveniles to death. Most importantly, we will analyze possible factors that contributed to the decision of Roper v Simmons such as the international community's opposition of the juvenile death penalty and the majority consensus of the American public in outlawing this practice.…

    • 3690 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has generated a considerable amount of debate and controversy surrounding the question: what is considered “cruel and unusual punishment.” The important issue that develops from this amendment is whether or not the death penalty is constitutional. Over the decades, the Supreme Court fails to completely confront the issue by refusing to address any issue that falls outside of the case in question. As a result, today’s court is left with many specific instances where the death penalty is acceptable or unconstitutional, but not an overall principle that the death penalty is consistent or inconsistent with the Constitution. In Roper v. Simmons, seventeen year-old Christopher Simmons is tried as an adult…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782, 102 S. Ct. 3368, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1140 (1982)…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    403 U.S. 217; 91 S. Ct. 1940; 29 L. Ed. 2d 438; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 27…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays