Preview

Coriolanus Is A Man Of Words

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
430 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Coriolanus Is A Man Of Words
Menenius is a man of words, while Coriolanus is a man of action, one would say that a man of action is better than a one of words, this will be argued within this essay.
Caius Martius later known as Coriolanus due to his honourableness as a solider and leader, he is a man who is proud however short tempered with all he does. He is a man who doesn’t think anything of the common folk “rats”, to him their opinions are of no relevance and mean nothing, Coriolanus is defiantly a man of action as he is not used to interacting with the with the people but giving orders to soldiers and them being obeyed. As well as Coriolanus not liking the common people has had a negative effect on him in that the common people have not taking a liking to him for the reason in that he doesn’t respect so why should they support him “Caius martius is chief enemy to the people” when he plan to be in power, they are not fond of him “he is a very dog to the commonalty” due to of how prideful he is if he wasn’t so proud they would different attitudes towards him “if he would incline to the people, there was never a worthier man”, however Coriolanus refers to the common folk as a “herd” of animals which doesn’t sit well, which would not have him as a man of words but action.
…show more content…
Menenius is always there to sooth the conflict situations, he is one who reasons with those are who are in conflict to get the resolution, Menenius is man of very little action but is in the favour of the common folk “worthy Menenius Agrippa, one that hath always loved the people”, he is very respectful towards the common folk and thinks of them as equel and that they should be spoken to just as any other, with that being said of a very wise, persuasive and outspoken man he lakes courage in that of what he does, however he has a bigger support group because of his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Is against Caesar’s gaining of power. He believes, however, that Caesar is the consummate actor, lulling the populace into believing that he has no personal ambition.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. Why do the men want Cicero on their side at first? Why do they change their minds?…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crassus was a bad military General because he wanted to win all the battles he fought without help. He did this because he knew that If he asked for help the glory of winning won’t mostly go to Crassus. He was sogreedy for power and…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cicero, Roman Senator and Philosopher, set up specific qualities of an ideal Roman ruler. A clear role in what it takes to effectively lead. A leader must first lead a dignified life for them to lead a successful empire. Leaders must demonstrate a work ethic and ability to gain respect. With that respect, leaders must love and care for their subordinates to show their compassionate towards the Roman people. Leaders must then demonstrate ethics to provide plans that must be followed in order to bring success to their empire. Politically, Cicero’s ideals reflected on both Marcus Aurelius and Commodus in various distinct ways. Marcus Aurelius and Commodus were men that ruled the empire of Rome and their governance had a profound impact in the Roman history. However while Marcus Aurelius was a grown just, benevolent man who fought for the power of Rome and successfully won the battle, Commodus was young, ignorant, cruel ruler, who demanded respect soon after he took position as emperor, and seriously weakened Roman Empire.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Coriolanus, Shakespeare to a full extent questions the value of the Roman warrior code and sees the difficulties that it causes. Firstly I discuss the warrior code that is valued and held in Rome. Secondly I analyze Coriolanus inability to infringe the warrior code entirely. Thirdly I explore the consequences this has on Roman society.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. What does Marullus mean when he says: “You blocks, you stones, and you worse than senseless things! O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome, Knew you not Pompey?”…

    • 3419 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agricola and Germania

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Through Tacitus’ writings, one can see that Roman society placed a huge importance on their military services. It is shown that all of the ranks have an importance placed on them for their military service. During the time period of Tacitus there is military conquest of Britannia by the Romans. In Agricola, Tacitus paints a picture of the Roman ideals of strong military as portrayed through Gnaeus Julius Agricola. Tacitus shows the importance of Roman ideals for their military system such as empathy, leadership, discipline. Empathy is shown in Julius Agricola through Tacitus stating that “He would condone minor offences, but dealt severely with major crimes. However, he did not always pronounce a sentence.” (71) This shows that Julius Agricola was not just a good military leader but he also was just and fair. By painting this picture of a fair and just military leader, Tacitus tries to show that he is tied to these ideals, which is important for him while trying to become politically involved. Tacitus also shows how Julius Agricola embodies the military discipline and leadership in that he expresses that Julius Agricola “praised the energetic and scolded the slack; and competition for honor proved as effective as compulsion.” (72) Again, through…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Odysseus, the ruler of the island kingdom of Ithaca, was known by all for his cleverness and cunning, but what I noticed throughout my readings of Odysseus is that he is also shows some weaknesses at times. I will discuss examples of each of these prevalent traits throughout this essay.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Odysseus: A Bad Leader

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Odyssey translated by Robert Fagles is about Odysseus who is the king of Ithaca and his troubles with the Greek gods. Odysseus may be a good king but he is certainly not a very good leader when it comes to long journeys and battles. He made it home to Ithica but not without a lot of struggles and bad decisions. Odysseus’ selfishness, anger, and stubbornness were a part of his not too great leadership throughout the Odyssey. He did not protect his men very well. A leader needs to also be a team player and Odysseus did not show that quality at all. He would always do something that was not trustworthy. One minute he might have done something to show that he could be trusted but then the next minute he word do something dumb and ruin the trust of his men.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lincoln’s life in Indiana wasn’t really easy. Wild animals were around his home and Lincoln wasn’t really educated in the terms of going to school. He only went to school for a short amount of time, but he still managed to remember how to read and write. Lincoln’s mother died in 1818 and his father remarried a widow named Sarah Bush Johnston. In 1830, the Lincoln family again moved to another state. The family this time moved to Illinois. A year later, Abraham Lincoln left his home for a town near Springfield, Illinois. In his new surroundings, Lincoln had several jobs and even served in a war called the Black Hawk War in 1832 (NSP, 1924). During the war, he was elected as captain of his volunteer group.…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another man who strived to have utter power in the story is Cassius. Cassius was a demented man who took power from other people for his own personal use. He plotted conspiracies about people because of his own jealousy towards people. Cassius also was a very tricky man who planned to convince Brutus to join his team in the fight to kill Julius Caesar. He wanted to take power from Julius know mater what the consequences would be.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Odysseus Is A Good Leader

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many people recognize Odysseus as strong, heroic leader worthy of adoration, but is he really all that he is cracked up to be? Over the course of his journey home, he displays some overwhelming negative characteristics. Odysseus is not an admirable character because he is a poor leader, he displays hubris that puts his men in harm’s way, and he is unreliable. Odysseus is undeserving of adoration because he is a poor leader. This is evident as he sets his men free in Ismarus to do as they please.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oedipus Rex

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In all the passages that have been written through history on how an excellent man should behave, one writing stands out from all of them. Aristotle’s, The High-Minded Man. This manuscript explains that for any play to be truly considered a tragedy, its hero must meet Aristotle’s standards for a high-minded man. In the tragedy of Oedipus Rex, by Sophacles, Oedipus clearly meets the requirements to be called a high-minded man. Oedipus is expressive about his thoughts, exceptionally important in society, and lastly an honorable man.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays