Preview

Corporate Veil

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
880 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corporate Veil
Introduction
The main concept in the assignment is about corporate personality. First of all, we need to clarify the meaning and characteristics of company. In short, company means a body of persons combined for a common object. A company exist there must be a group of persons that more than 1 persons. In eyes of law, a company is a separate legal personality from its members. In Section 16(5) CA1965, it stated that a body corporate obligations and liabilities are its own, and not those of its participation; it can sue and be sued in its own name; the property is not the property of its participants; and company can enter into a contract.
Whilst, we need to understand the types of Joe’s company belong to. In section 16(4), it stated that company divided into 4 types that are limited by shares, limited by guarantee, limited by guarantee and shares and the last one was unlimited companies. While Joe’s company belongs to company limited by shares, it means that member’s liability is limited to unpaid amount on the shares taken up by them, it stated in section 18(3) CA 1965.
From the whole assignment, we need to identify whether corporate veil can be lifted in the particular situation. So, we need to obtain an understanding what is corporate veil. Corporate veil it can define as separates company from its members, or we can say that legal person (company) separate from its members. Since company is a separate entity with its members, the company has power to hold land, enjoys perpetual succession even the death of one of its member, the company will not dissolve.
Next, we going to identify in what situation corporate veil will be lifted. Lifting the corporate veil it means that separation between company and its participants does not exist anymore. The court will lift the corporate veil when controllers behave some unethical behavior, or controllers concern about their interest much more than other parties’ interest. Corporate veil may be lifted either by the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gahsa Rjewrj Wv

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Piercing the corporate veil or lifting the corporate veil is a legal decision to treat the rights or duties of a corporation as the rights or liabilities of its shareholders. Usually a corporation is treated as a separate legal person, which is solely responsible for the debts it incurs and the sole beneficiary of the credit it is owed.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legt 2741 Assignment

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages

    However, the precedent in the Saloman Case is not gospel and the ‘corporate veil’ can be lifted in certain circumstances . If the company is used:…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Per The Model Business Corporation Acr, or MBCA, which is followed in thirty two states and is a set of laws that set the standard for the definition of corporations, the most common factors that courts consider in determining whether to pierce the corporate veil are: (1) the existence of fraud; (2) failure to adhere to corporate formalities; (3) inadequate capitalization; and (4) abuse of the corporate entity so as to amount to complete domination. Some corporations may be especially vulnerable to violating the above factors inadvertently, simply because of their size and business practices.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study-James Hardie

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Piercing the corporate veil describes a legal decision to treat the rights or duties of a corporation as the rights or liabilities of its shareholders or directors. Usually a corporation is treated as a separate legal person, which is solely responsible for the debts it incurs and the sole beneficiary of the credit it is owed. Common law countries usually uphold this principle of separate personhood, but in exceptional situations may "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil. A simple example would be where a businessman has left his job as a director and has signed a contract to not compete with the company he has just left for a period of time. If he set up a company which competed with his former company, technically it would be the company and not the person competing. But it is likely a court would say that the new company was just a "sham", a "fraud" or some other phrase,[1] and would still allow the old company to sue the man for breach of contract. A court would look beyond the "legal fiction" to the reality of the situation.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This course aims to introduce students to the process of incorporation, including the development of the modern corporation and an introduction to regulatory structures; an introduction to the corporate constitution, organs and capital; the separate personality of the corporation and its exceptions.…

    • 3601 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aem 1200

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. Define corporation. What are the fundamental characteristics of the corporate form as a mode of business ownership? Why has the corporate form being successful? From an ethical perspective, is the corporate form appropriate? Discuss arguments in favor and against, and state your (supported) opinion.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ian M Ramsay Harold Ford Professor of Commercial Law and Director, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation The University of Melbourne David B Noakes Solicitor, Allen Allen & Hemsley, Sydney, and Research Associate, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation The University of Melbourne There is a significant amount of literature by commentators discussing the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil. However, there has not been a comprehensive empirical study of the Australian cases relating to this doctrine. In this article, the authors present the results of the first such study. Some of the findings are (i) there has been a substantial increase in the number of piercing cases heard by courts over time; (ii) courts are more prepared to pierce the corporate veil of a proprietary company than a public company; (iii) piercing rates decline as the number of shareholders in companies increases; (iv) courts pierce the corporate veil less frequently when piercing is sought against a parent company than when piercing is sought against one or more individual shareholders; and (v) courts pierce more frequently in a contract context than in a tort context. ____________________________________________________________…

    • 15226 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world of business has come a long way since the laissez-faire government attitudes of the 19th Century. Governmental rules and regulations have emerged over the past century in reaction to the excessive business power of the corporation. The government has frequently stepped in to protect business stakeholders after failed corporate governance. According to (Public Law 107-204-July…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The essay will discuss the problems that may arise with cases related to the business’ corporate personality and how its not always the most simple of cases when trying to follow the doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22. This is a case which set a precedent for the concept of corporate personality and highlights the issues that are faced during the trial of such cases. In contrast to this case is another well known case, Littlewoods Mail Order Stores v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1969] 3 All ER 422. This case shows the contradictory outcomes that can occur when the courts, ‘draw aside the veil’ , which is a matter of importance mentioned by Lord Denning. The case represented the value of distinguishing ownership so as to ascertain culpability.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Environment

    • 5667 Words
    • 20 Pages

    This report comprises 3 major tasks which includes explanation of the types of organizations and their nature. Organizations are mainly divided into 2 categories they are public organizations run under government e.g. public limited companies (plc) and private organizations operated by the private individual’s e.g. sole trader. People who are interested in the operations of the organizations are known as stakeholders e.g. shareholders, employees, customers, competitors etc. It a responsibility of the organization to fulfill their needs and interest if they want to run the business in its most effective manner. In addition, it is important for…

    • 5667 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PT Peresseia Mazekadwisapta Abadi (Primaz) located at Jalan Jenderal Suprapto Komplek Ruko Grosir Cempaka Mas Blok F 14, Jakarta Pusat is a company engaged in trading Gold Bars (Precious Metals), which buys and sells Gold Bars (Precious Metals) 24 carat (999 , 9) with a program of regular discounts and warranty repurchase as the initial purchase price.…

    • 2229 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Negotiable Instruments

    • 5924 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Evolution and Revolution of Negotiable Instruments as facilitator for Trade and Commerce and 10 years Taking forward…

    • 5924 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    absolute and untouchable. In fact, there is a tendency for natural persons to use a…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: Chia Chee Hoong, Company Law Study Manual (Textbook Series 2010) Brickfields Asia College Publication.…

    • 4744 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    company law

    • 5144 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The law has developed various remedies where the majority act unfairly or oppressively in order to protect the interests of the company and its member.…

    • 5144 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays