Cosmological Argument Essay
Humans use technology reach many parts of the universe around us, helping to scope out the unknown, but although progress has been made mankind only knows a fragment of the universe. As Dean Koontz once stated, “in an infinite universe, anything that could be imagined might somewhere exist” helping to open our minds to the fact that we are possible not the only life through out the universe (Koontz). Many theories and arguments have been made on how the universe came about. It might seem that these theories provide the best explanation. Yet, the Cosmological Argument stands out the best by providing us with the idea that God created the universe and set everything into motion. It challenges us to think logically about how natural causes and
…show more content…
We can argue this because a natural event needs a cause. However, a supernatural event must take place to even create that first cause and set the universe in motion. The Cosmological was first created in Neoplatonism and early Christianity and also back later in medieval Islamic theology during the 9th to 12th centuries. Reintroduced to Christian theology in the 13th century by Thomas Aquinas, this argument helped strengthen peoples beliefs in a God, and also providing a solid argument for how the universe came about.The Cosmological Argument is defined in Merriam Webster as “an argument for the existence of God that claims that all things in nature depend on something else for their existence, and that the whole cosmos must therefore itself depend on a being that exists independently or necessarily” defining how this view of God is thought in supernatural terms and showing that he is powerful. It begins with what is most obvious in reality: things exist. It is argued that the cause of those things’ existence had to be a "God-type" event. These kinds of arguments reach back to Plato and have been used by credible philosophers and theologians ever since. Science and technology finally caught up with theologians in the 20th century, when it was confirmed that the universe must have had a beginning. So, today, the cosmological arguments are even powerful for non-philosophers. There are two basic foundations of these arguments, and the simplest way to think of them might be the "vertical" and the "horizontal." These names indicate the direction from which the causes come. In the vertical form, it is argued that every created thing is being caused right now. The horizontal version shows that creation had to have a cause in the
We can argue this because a natural event needs a cause. However, a supernatural event must take place to even create that first cause and set the universe in motion. The Cosmological was first created in Neoplatonism and early Christianity and also back later in medieval Islamic theology during the 9th to 12th centuries. Reintroduced to Christian theology in the 13th century by Thomas Aquinas, this argument helped strengthen peoples beliefs in a God, and also providing a solid argument for how the universe came about.The Cosmological Argument is defined in Merriam Webster as “an argument for the existence of God that claims that all things in nature depend on something else for their existence, and that the whole cosmos must therefore itself depend on a being that exists independently or necessarily” defining how this view of God is thought in supernatural terms and showing that he is powerful. It begins with what is most obvious in reality: things exist. It is argued that the cause of those things’ existence had to be a "God-type" event. These kinds of arguments reach back to Plato and have been used by credible philosophers and theologians ever since. Science and technology finally caught up with theologians in the 20th century, when it was confirmed that the universe must have had a beginning. So, today, the cosmological arguments are even powerful for non-philosophers. There are two basic foundations of these arguments, and the simplest way to think of them might be the "vertical" and the "horizontal." These names indicate the direction from which the causes come. In the vertical form, it is argued that every created thing is being caused right now. The horizontal version shows that creation had to have a cause in the