My court case observation was interesting, to say the least. I walked into the DeKalb county courthouse, in Auburn, Indiana, not knowing where to go, what to say or do, or even how to dress. By the time I left, I had learned far more than I planned on, and not just through observing . . . I sat in on three trials: two civil cases and one criminal case. Afterwards, I had the unique opportunity to talk with the judge and county bailiff for about half of an hour. The first case I observed was finishing up as I came in. Quietly seating myself in the back of the room, I noticed that there weren’t very many people occupying the space. Only five other people were in the room that I thought would be bigger than it was (as seen on television). The criminal case, from what I could catch of it, was a concerning action of today’s society: a neighbor hacked into the other’s Wi-Fi network and stole bank account information. Because the details weren’t talked about often, I wasn’t able to understand exactly what happened, but by the judge’s tone of voice, I could tell he was very disappointed in the defendant. The courtroom, like I previously stated, was occupied with five people other than myself. Judge Kevin Wallace sat in a large podium at the front of the room, while the court reporter was stationed perpendicular in front of him. To Judge Wallace’s front left was whom I assume the plaintiff, with no attorney present. To the right, the defendant, again with no support. One observer joined me in the pews. I happened to notice twelve chairs on the edge of the room, which I later found out were for the jury duty, which was not present at this case. The case ended with the defendant and plaintiff silently walking out after the judge found a mistake in the wording of a document. He said the case could not continue until the confusion was cleared up, and with that, everyone left. The second case I observed was a small claims case. I walked into Superior Court II to find three people other than myself occupying the room. Judge Monte Brown was seated in the podium at the front of the even-smaller room than before. A lady was standing just outside of the podium speaking with Judge Brown. Dressed very casually, she leaned against the podium like she had done it a hundred times. The third man in the room was the county bailiff, named Tim. I again seated myself quietly in the back of the room while the lady and Judge Brown discussed the reason she was there: her tenant failed to pay the housing rent for many consecutive months. No defendant was present. Ending the case with a handshake and a set amount of money to be won, the lady excused herself from the room while the next hearing was set to begin. Another civil case, filed for illegally downloading music, had the same set up. No attorney present, and no defendant. This is something I learned during my observation; not every case has to be set with an entire committee of people. Defendants and plaintiffs are able to represent themselves, and court can run just as smoothly with just the plaintiff and not a defendant present. One additional thing I discovered was that there is a limit to how much you can sue for: nothing over $6,000 in Indiana. While it’s different in every state, the amount fluctuates by, in my opinion, the value of the dollar in each state. There is also a time limit by how far past the damages occurred that you can sue for. Indiana, for a personal injury case, the amount has to be sued for within two years of the accident. For property damages or through an oral contract, the wait is six years. Finally, breaking a written contract leaves 10 years to file a claim.
The last case I was able to be present for was a complaint about car damages that happened by accident. It’s common to be fearful that the person you parked next to is going to open their car door into yours, and for the man, that’s exactly what happened. Again with no defendant present, the plaintiff shared his story about extreme car damages that happened about a month and a half prior. Another thing I learned through this case was that court happens pretty quickly after the claim is filed. While I’m not sure if it was just because the courthouse wasn’t as busy, or if it’s because that just how fast it happens, a month and a half was not very long of a wait, in my opinion. I wasn’t able to experience any plea bargains or even see someone sentenced to jail, but found out how small claims cases work. When I was preparing to leave the courtroom after the last case was finished, the county bailiff approached me and asked my name. He then proceeded to ask me the reason I was at the courthouse, and I answered that it was a class assignment that I’d have to write a report on later. He thought for a moment, and then asked me to follow him up to Judge Brown’s podium. Nervous, I introduced myself to Judge Brown while he joked that he was going to try to convince me to stay out of the criminal justice field! He began to share his story of how he was able to get into the criminal justice field, and how grateful he was for the support of his coworkers. The county bailiff, Tim, was the county probation officer for over 30 years and stated that his past military experience was great help in the officer position. Tim also informed me of openings at the DeKalb County courthouse that would be available soon, and encouraged me to come back next summer for an internship. I learned while speaking to the judge and Tim that they hear about 50 cases everyday. It blew my mind! I had no idea there were that many court cases, even within a week! Tim invited me to come back Thursday, July 25 to help him call the next cases and be able to sit in a jury duty chair. I think talking to Judge Brown and Tim made me realize that not everyone in the criminal justice field is big, bad, or out to scare everyone. Though my major is Management, I might keep my mind open to other things. I’ve always wondered about how court works, so choosing this option was definitely best for me. Everyone I told about going to observe a court case said it would be the most boring thing, but I actually thought it was quite interesting to learn about. I walked in the courthouse with pretty nice dress clothes on, but noticed that everyone else there, even the defendants and plaintiffs, wore casual clothes and didn’t act too professionally. I plan on taking up Tim’s offer of helping him in the coming week, so I hope to learn more than I did this past time. Through this experience, I learned more about the government and criminal justice system than I could have otherwise.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Honorable Kathryn Nelson began the morning addressing the attorneys. ASA Bodek informed the judge that he had seen the defendant driving the previous day knowing that one of the charges were driving without a valid driver license. He wanted to ensure that his observation was on record. The judge then asked the defense attorneys if they had anything that they needed to address, which they responded no. Judge Nelson delayed the trial for approximately 20 minutes so the bailiff could go and locate a hearing device for Mr. Burke since he was hearing impaired. Once that was taken care of, the jury was brought into the courtroom. Judge Nelson greeted the jury and told them that opening statements would take place. Facing the Judge, the prosecution sat to the right and the defense sat to the left. Against the right wall of the courtroom is where the jury sat. Witnesses for the prosecution sat behind the ASA and witnesses or friends and family for the defense sat behind the defense attorneys.…
- 2953 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
It was a pleasure to meet you at the convention for trial attorneys in New York last week. In addition to the interesting program highlights of the regular sessions, the informal discussions with people like you are an added plus at these meetings. Your contribution to the program was very beneficial and highly informative.…
- 354 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
courtrooms were slightly larger than I had expected it would be. Within most of the…
- 441 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This court case took place in the United States Supreme Court in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this court case is Deborah White, represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, represented by Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. Deborah White brought this court case to the Supreme Court in order to argue against the summary judgment filed by the defendents. A summary judgment is granted only if all of the written evidence before the court clearly establishes that there are no disputed issues of material fact and that the party who requested the summary…
- 401 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The book Courtroom 302, written by Steve Bogira in 2005, is about the criminal courts in Chicago, IL. Steve Bogira graduated from Northwestern University, and is an excellent reporter for the Chicago Review. Courtroom 302 is story told mainly from through Steve Bogira’s observations. Bogira observes a courtroom (Courtroom 302), and basically the entire justice system process from beginning to end. The courtroom that Bogira observes is in the control of Judge Daniel Locallo. Judge Locallo helps give Bogira an all access view, plus vital personal thoughts and feelings about issues and events that he has dealt with; and Bogira has observed. Judge Locallo is not the only person that expresses personal information. Many employees of the Cook County Criminal Courthouse also give insight on events and issues they have experienced. The way that Bogira has organized the book allows the reader to see the criminal process in a variety of stages. The effort put forth by author Steve Bogira gives the reader a real-life view of what occurs in criminal courts daily.…
- 1869 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Arthur glanced up as the jury members took their seats. Next, the plaintiffs associated with the lawsuit filed into the galley, followed by onlookers, which meant Judge Valdis would enter at any moment. She was fair, but firm and kept strict order in her courtroom, which Arthur appreciated. She did not tolerate showboating or grandstanding.…
- 814 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In this paper I’m going to detail the judicial process of a Supreme Court case, which was the first of its kind. The Supreme Court did not have original jurisdiction over this case. It traveled through each juridical system before reaching the Supreme Court. This case was of interest to them, not to question it the defendant was guilty, but were his constitutional rights violated in the process of prosecuting him. This case began with an anonymous tip that the defendant was growing illegal contraband at his home. The DEA assigned Detective Padraja and Detective Bartelt to sit on the home. After making the decision that no one was home the…
- 1003 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Speeches were essential in winning cases in front of the dikasteria, or a court panel, similar…
- 1044 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In Virginia State, Jay Lentz was convicted by a jury in July 2003 for the kidnapping and murder of his wife. The jury recommended that Mr. Lentz spend life in prison; however, the United States District Judge Gerald Lee dismissed the kidnapping charge due to lack of evidence. Two weeks after the judge convicted Mr. Lentz of murder, he found evidence of prosecutorial misconduct therefore the judge ordered a new trial for the alleged murder charge.…
- 1215 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Identify the most salient practice issue for the chosen discipline in criminal and civil court proceedings and offer one possible macro-level solution.…
- 6542 Words
- 27 Pages
Powerful Essays -
* The author will determine courtroom groups, how the groups interact daily, and recommend changes to the groups. The author will also describe prosecutor roles and the cases he pursues. Finally, the author will elaborate on the funnel of criminal justice with the backlog among the courtroom group, the court system, give an example, and explain how to eliminate backlog cases.…
- 1190 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Courtney Lee, a 20-year-old woman, the defendant in this case, was charged with first degree felony for two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a 13-year-old boy , a minor, she was dating. The initial bond was set at $5000 for each count, under the compulsory condition that she not be allowed around any minors. The case was taken back to court because the defendant dishonored the mandate of her release by being…
- 420 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Trial Judges are appointed to ensure justice in courtroom proceedings. Judges are also responsible with safeguarding both rights of the accused, and interests of the public. By doing so, this keeps the prosecutor grounded by making sure guilt is established of the accused as required by criminal law. The workgroup interact with each other daily. While the judge oversees the procedure, the prosecutor, defense attorney, and public defenders help to create a visual that is easy for the judge to see what happened. Prosecuting attorneys are the primary representatives of the people, by virtue of belief that the accused violated a criminal law and that the public knows about it. The defense attorney represents the accused by making sure that the defendant’s civil…
- 730 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The significance of observing this courtroom trial was to see the way our federal courts systems work. In this case I saw a criminal law trial, which chapter 15 explains as the branch of the law that deals with disputes or an action involving criminal penalties that regulates the conduct of individuals, defines crimes, and provides punishment for criminal acts. Chapter 15 gave me a better understanding of how…
- 575 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
I was a bit intimated walking in due to how big the courthouse looked, but once I arrived, I went to the help desk and a police officer kindly directed me to the room I was looking for. I was a bit surprised when I walked into the courtroom regarding its size. I expected to be a lot bigger due to the media’s representation of courtrooms on TV shows and movies. The courtroom was very plan looking, but neat. When I first arrived only a few people were present and court was not yet in session. Within fifteen minutes of me arriving, the judge, Rachelle L. Harz, walked in and asked if everyone was ready, however, a juror had not yet arrived, and it took approximately ten more minutes for the juror to arrive, and then court was in session. While waiting for the juror to arrive, the plaintiff’s attorney approached me and he was very pleasant, he asked me what school I attended, what my major was and if I am considering law school. He also pointed out that Montclair State University has a very good paralegal program, which is something that I have been…
- 1664 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays