Preview

Court Room Observation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
378 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Court Room Observation
Courtroom Observation
Joshua B. Lawson
Business 301
June 21, 2013

After watching the series of videos for the assignment this is what I have come up with this for the assignment. The case that we are observing took place in the United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, and Mr. Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, as well as, Jackson Welch and Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White. They are a group of four very impressive first year law students. The case is based on an incident that occurred when Mrs. White and her husband, Mr. White, were having dinner at O’Malley’s Tavern. Mr. Edward Hard, Mrs. White’s ex-fiancé was also at O’Malley’s Tavern that night. It was noted that he had consumed a considerable amount of alcohol. When Mrs. White and her husband left the tavern, Mr. Hard stumbled out of the tavern behind them, got into his vehicle, hit several vehicles, and chased the Whites’ out of the parking lot. Within roughly a half of a mile, he drove into the side of their car, killing Mr. White and injuring Mrs. White. The plaintiff Mrs. White believes that O’Malley’s Tavern is also partially responsible and should have intervened with Mr. Hard and not allowed him to leave intoxicated. The defendants are seeking a summary judgment which is a procedural device used during civil litigation to promptly and expeditiously resolve a case without a trail. They are claiming that there is not sufficient evidence to support that the bartender saw any visual signs of intoxication from Mr. Hart. However the plaintiff Debbie White is requesting the court to deny the defendants request for summary judgment. This would mean that O’Malley’s Tavern could not be held subject to any legal responsibility for Mr. Hards actions. The plaintiff is claiming that there is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the early morning hours of September 18, 1992, a police officer employed by defendant Town of Cheektowaga pulled over an automobile owned by plaintiff's decedent, Jacqueline Walsh. An acquaintance of Walsh was driving and she was a passenger. As the result of the traffic stop, the acquaintance was placed under arrest for driving while intoxicated. Based upon his observations of Walsh, the officer determined that Walsh was also intoxicated and unable to drive safely. The officer testified that he offered to call a cab or give Walsh a ride to any destination she chose, but Walsh…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the case of White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, Mrs. White is suing Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern in the death of her husband, Mr. White. Mr. Edward Hard was a patron of the tavern the night of the accident with Mr. and Mrs. White. Mr. Hard was in a relationship with Mrs. White before she married Mr. White. Mr. Hard saw Mr. and Mrs. White leave the tavern on this night and followed them out the door. Mrs. White observed Mr. Hard drinking several alcoholic beverages while they were there. When Mr. and Mrs. White where leaving Mr. Hard confronted Mr. White telling him that “she should be my wife” and “this is not over.” After Mr. and Mrs. White got in their car and were leaving the establishment, Mr. Hard followed them driving recklessly. He was swerving across the road, driving in the opposite lane, and hitting mailboxes. His recklessness and inability to drive due to being intoxicated resulted in him crashing into Mr. and Mrs. White’s vehicle ultimately killing Mr. White and severely injuring Mrs. White. This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, Jordan Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    9. On the occasion in question, Defendant was traveling behind Plaintiff in the left hand lane of Interstate 57 when Plaintiff noticed Defendant’s lights flashing. Plaintiff moved over to the right hand lane to allow Defendant to pass, at which time he saw beer cases falling from Defendant’s truck towards him. Plaintiff swerved left in an attempt to avoid the beer cases when the accident occurred.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The court case was about The Ransom Of Red Chief. The teams defended the witnesses such as Red Chief, Sam, Bill. The prosecuting team believed that Bill didn’t get kidnapped by those two kidnappers. The defense team believed that Bill was mentally challenged and Red Chief did harm his kids and abuse the cat. The prosecuting team said that Red Chief was hounded down by those two kidnappers and lured in by some candy that they had hidden. They conjointly believed that they put her in a bag and yielded her into a little shed. The prosecuting team won the case by way of evidence. I believe that the defense team should have won by way of evidence from the trial.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Procedural History: Lower court entered a directed verdict for Dr. Turk b/c there was an absence of evidence that he intended to inflict personal injury…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff Randy Fontenot was driving in the city owned police car at high speeds. When he reached an intersection, FOntenot collided with defendant, Germaine Brooks and Wife, in their car. Fontenot was severely hurt, while Brooks’ wife was killed. Randy Fontenot is sued Brooks and his insurance company, Patterson Insurance. Then the DOTD was added as a defendant in this case because they were responsible for the unsafe intersection. At the trial court they ruled that 90% of the fault was on Mr. Brooks; Mr. FOntenot was liable for 10%; and the DOTD was not liable at all. The Fontenot's the filed for an appeal. The appellate court agreed with the trial courts but they said that Fontenot was not liable at all for the accident. They saide Mr. Brooks and the DOTD were each 50% at fault. Now they have appealed to the Supreme Court.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Appellant believes the court hindered his ability to provide a defense based on his alibi that he was not present at the scene of the crime when the fire occurred and that he claimed the fire resulted by way of accidentally leaving a hot plate on. The prosecution proved the appellant conspired to ignite the fire later when he was not present. Prosecution also proved that by pouring the accelerant around the hot plate with the power on, is not indicative of an accident. The defense must prove "impossibility of the accused's presence," for which the court found no basis for error in the original trial.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case being observed here was that of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O 'Malley 's Tavern, case # 82A04-8876-CV-285. This was brought before a mock U.S. District Court panel of judges, in the Northern District of Indiana. The Plaintiff being Deborah White, and the Defendant being Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The Plaintiffs’ Attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jakson Walsh and the attorneys for the defendant are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. In this case the defendant’s attorneys are seeking a summary Judgment for their client. This is a kind of resolution that would allow for them to avoid going to trial only if the Judge sees fit to deem that there are no disputes to the material facts of this case. And on the opposing side the Plaintiff Deborah white is requesting that the courts deny the defendants request for summary judgment.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The background of this lawsuit is based on Debbie White suing Patrick Gibbs and his Tavern for the death of her husband . The reason why Debbie wants the bar to be held responsible is due to the fact that Mr. Edward Hard left intoxicated and crashed into Mrs. White 's car and killed her husband . The Gibbs feel his bar shouldn’t be held responsible due to the fact that the bartender didn’t see Mr. Hard intoxicated. Mr. Hard was also an ex-boyfriend of Debbie 's and the bar feels that the accident was intentional. Mr. Gibbs wants the court to dismiss the case based on summary judgment which is “a judgment requested by any party to a civil action to end the action when it is believed that there is no genuine issue or material fact in dispute” (Mosby’s Dictionary).…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ultimately, the court did not see it Mrs. McCarty’s way. McCarty argued the judge should have granted her motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict for the defendant. McCarty did not request the directed verdict on the issue of Pheasant Runs negligence which is a prerequisite to judgment n.o.v. Many accidents are neither the injurer nor the victims fault and therefore there is no liability. The judge advised Mrs. McCarty that the case was not as one sided as she believed it to be. Additionally, following a jury’s verdict, a judge cannot substitute its judgment when the judgment was reasonable (2). Mrs. McCarty did a poor job in proving that Pheasant Run could have prevented her attack with her advised precautions. Mrs. McCarty did not provide information of what it would cost Pheasant Run to equip the hotel rooms with improved locking systems…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Observation

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Liberty University presented a case of White v. Gibbs which is about Mrs. Debbie White and Patrick Gibbs under the civil provisions of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act, Indiana Code 7.1-5-10-15.5. In this case Mrs. Debbie White sued Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. Because White and Gibbs do not live in the same states, the suit was brought in diversity in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. However, the suit will be decided under Indiana state law. The main goal of this courtroom is to argue the motion for summary judgment which is concerning the case of Mrs. Debbie White, Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. In this case, the plaintiff is Debbie White. Two moot court attorneys who are Amanda Babbitt and Jack Walsh represent Mrs. White. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. Also two other moot court attorneys who are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter represent the defendants which are Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MSTT met with Pamm and Alyianna to address their concerns regarding this weeks upcoming court hearing. The court hearing is to address whether or not the process will begin for Pamm to become Alyianna permanent guardian. MSTT had Pamm and Alyianna express their concerns regarding court and their main concern was Alyianna having to appear in court in front of her mother. Pamm and Alyianna have spoken with their lawyer and CYS and was informed Alyianna will meet with the judge, and lawyers in a separate room to express her feelings regarding the situation. Pamm believes this could change the day of the court because of changes that have happened in the past. MSTT worked with Pamm on developing a plan to address her concern to CYS and her lawyer…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandy Hearst Case Study

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The trial of Terry Vickers v. Sandy Hearst. Sandy Hearst claims that Dana Ivy had been drunk, which ended up causing a car collision on the morning of December 17. the defendant states that Dana Ivy was not drunk, as well as that alcohol was not the cause of this accident that took place at the intersection of Justice and Eagle street. This accident caused injuries to Terry Vickers. Terry Vickers wants to sue Sandy Hearst for pain, suffering, in addition lost wages, Sandy Hearst is the host of a party that took place on the night of December 16, when one host a party, it is their duty to be sure that those who consume alcohol are not over consuming, plus this did not cause an accident that causes injuries to others. Dana Ivy will testify that she was not drunk and that the cause of the accident was because she was tired not drunk, Sandy Hearst will testify that she did not over serve or force drinks on anyone at the party. The plaintiff will try to adverse these statements, but their…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Obersvation

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “The State of Indiana requires that a plaintiff meet the following elements in order to recover damages: the defendant must have actual knowledge that the person to whom the alcoholic beverage was furnished was visibly intoxicated at the time the alcoholic beverage was furnished, and the intoxication of the person to whom the alcoholic beverage was furnished was a proximate cause of the death, injury, or damage alleged in the complaint” (Gumprecht, 1). The intent of this courtroom process is to challenge the State of Indiana law regarding material fact, while also arguing the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff, however, desires to proceed to trial.…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The communication process begins when potential jurors are summoned by written communication through the United States Postal System to attend court for jury selection. Each juror is directed to the appropriate courtroom through verbal communication by court officers. Once inside the courtroom, the court clerk verbally calls out each jurors name to complete attendance. Jurors raise their hands to acknowledge their presence. A written questionnaire is distributed to each juror to complete while simultaneously viewing a video covering the history of jury duty.…

    • 2618 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays