Apollo Group[Pick the date] |
University of Phoenix Material
Courtroom Participant Matrix
Complete the matrix below using your text and other resources.
Title | Role | Responsibilities | Ethical Duties | Selection Method | Judge | Is to see that both sides follow the laws, rules, and procedures that ensure a fair trial. | Controls the evidence that will be heard in the courtroom. | Uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary, avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety, be impartial and diligent. | Appointed by the President of the United States | Prosecutor | Deciding whether to bring criminal charges against a suspect and what charges. | Proving the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. | Ensure that innocent persons are not unfairly charged and that the evidence against a suspect is sufficient to support a specific charge. The finding of guilt or innocence either by trial or plea negotiation, as well as in the post-trial phase, which includes sentencing, appeals, and parole. | Appointed by the government. | Defense Attorney | Raise a reasonable doubt in just one juror’s mind. | Providing a vigorous and competent defense for their clients. | Should not offer services that they are not qualified, discriminate in any way, use deception, and engage in inappropriate relationships which would present a conflict of interest.
| Hired and paid by defendant. | Victim | Is to have a crime committed against him or her resulting in lost of property, damage to property or person. | To tell the police and the prosecution everything that he or she knows from the incident. | To tell the truth on the stand. | When a crime is committed against them and they or someone else reports the crime committed against them. | Defendant | A person formally accused of a crime. | To tell his or her attorney all information before a case. | To tell the truth on the stand. | When there is enough evidence provided by the police to prove the defendant committed the crime. | Jury | Decides whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty | Uses evidence at a trial and eh judge’s instructions on the law to determine the innocence of the defendant. | Watchful of their conduct and commit no act which may arouse the distrust of any individual. They should accept no gifts or favors, no matter how insignificant or trivial, either directly or indirectly from parties in the case or their lawyers. | Members of the surrounding community whose names are taken from voter’s registration and driver’s licenses. | Witnesses | To tell the truth about what he or she saw and be impartial to both parties. | To tell the truth about what he or she saw and be impartial to both parties. | To tell the truth on the stand. | Chosen because they know the individuals involved or were at the scene of the crime. | ______________ (Other Participants) | | | | |
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
He wants the honest truth about the situation. He does not want any false information. He wants to make an arrest…
- 1495 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
"It must be a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt." (515 S Ct. 506 (1995)…
- 1401 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
the due process of a trial) - all of which were required to be approved by…
- 351 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
2. The purpose of the first mention of a trial will be to ensure the representation of all accused…
- 629 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Explain the Nature and Types of Defenses Used in the Cases and what Evidence was used to demonstrate the defense…
- 2165 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
• The purposes and responsibilities of courts are to resolve disputes between governments, entities, corporations, businesses, partnerships, and individuals.…
- 869 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.…
- 402 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Show respect, Treat people as individuals, be aware of discrimination, Personal information to be kept confidential, don’t judge or make assumptions, to provide reliable service,…
- 496 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The role the jury trial plays in criminal cases is fundamental to the American scheme of justice.1 The right to a jury trial is rooted in our legal tradition2 and is articulated in the U.S. Constitution.3 This protection extends back to British common law, and serves as a check against government oppression by ensuring that a defendant’s fate lies in the hands of a jury of ordinary citizens rather than the government’s prosecutor or judge.4 Coupled with the presumption of innocence, the right to a jury trial serves as a “cornerstone of Anglo-Saxon justice”5 that limits potential government tyranny. At the heart of jury trial protections and the presumption of innocence lies the concern that it is better to let a guilty man go free than to convict an innocent man.6…
- 8780 Words
- 36 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Kathryn’s duty to do justice as the prosecutor, also applies during plea bargaining, whereby, a persons guilt must be established based on proof beyond a reasonable doubt. As such, the prosecutor’s primary objective “is to avoid punishing an innocent person. Because a prosecutor is obligated to act in all stages in the criminal justice process consistently with the sovereign's view that it is more important to avoid punishing the innocent, this principle applies to a prosecutor's efforts in resolving cases pre-trial” (Stern 1034). Regardless of how confident the prosecutor is of the defendant’s guilt, the prosecutor must ensure he does not offer a plea bargain that would result in an innocent individual to plead guilty as such an offer would subordinate the purpose of preventing an innocent individual from being punished to that of punishing a guilty individual, “thereby failing to strike the balance that justice requires” (Stern 1035). O’Hear suggests that a defendant should have the opportunity to convey their side of the story in order for the defendant to avoid getting convicted if they are innocent. It would also be beneficial to enhance the defendants perceptions of procedural justice by developing an objective criteria in order to direct plea negotiations and explain the prosecutors…
- 1578 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
In the United States criminal justice system, a courtroom work group is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. This is a foundational concept in the academic discipline of the criminal justice system. Everyone in the courtroom group tries to get along. Often they act as if they are good friends. Although the members of the court group are against each other, at the end of the day justice is being served in the courtroom regardless of the gender, race, or national origin. The role of the prosecutor is to represent the government and prove the defendant is guilty of the crime. Prosecutors participate in, jury selection; opening statements, direct examination, cross-examination, and closing arguments. The prosecutor also makes sure that the jurors can be fair as well. Prosecutors are able to determine which cases to work by confirming if perhaps the case has merit, and sufficient evidence to purse a conviction. If the criteria for taking a case were more or less stringent, it would make the police officers job a lot harder by having to go more in depth then what they have to go through nowadays, and this is due to the prosecutor having to prove even more evidence beyond a reasonable doubt in court. Nonetheless, if the criteria for taking of a case were less stringent I think that the officers and the prosecutors jobs would be too easy to prove if someone is guilty, and it would not give a defendant a fair trail. Perhaps the change that I would make to the courtroom work group would be that, many people believe that the courtroom work group should consider adding more security. Though out the years several cases…
- 344 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A failure in the criminal justice system or a wrongful conviction. Innocent people’s lives ruined over a crime they did not commit. A wrongful conviction or putting someone behind bars for a crime they did not commit. The repercussions when an individual is wrongly convicted can ruin an individual’s job, relationship, and many life-changing factors. Wrongful convictions affect everyone, they impact society majorly, and improving the legal representation for the poor will help solve this issue.…
- 1002 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
2. Discrimination – This company does not condone discriminating against any person or groups of persons on the basis of…
- 939 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
2. Uphold the highest standards of trade practices and ethics in the conduct of business, and advance the dignity of the profession;…
- 4493 Words
- 18 Pages
Powerful Essays -
b. observe and maintain the respect due to the courts of justice and judicial officers;…
- 60827 Words
- 244 Pages
Powerful Essays