Creation Vs Naturalism Essay

Creation vs. Naturalism

The creation vs. evolution debate is a continuous debate. How and why are we here on earth? Were we purposely made or did we evolve accidentally? Are we the creation of innovative intelligence or are we simply the end result of countless cosmic accidents? What does the evidence say? Two dominant views seem to battle their ideas and beliefs for countless centuries. While theists believe God is our glorious creator of everything, naturalists hold truth that God does not exist, only matter exists and we came into existence and operate by only physical processes. Without concrete evidence, the creation vs. nature debate doesn’t amount to much more than a philosophical dispute. Although everyone has the right to their
They affirm and revel in the fact that nature is enough. The acknowledgement that people are natural creatures has given naturalists positive effects, increasing their sense of connections to the world and those surrounding them This realization supports a progressive and effective engagement with the human condition in all its dimensions. By staying true to science, naturalists find themselves at home in the cosmos, astonished at the sheer scope and complexity of the natural world, and grateful for the chance to participate in the grand project of nature coming to know
Therefore, scientists who believe in creation do not try to devise theories to explain how God created, for human beings cannot understand how God created. On the other hand, evolutionary scientists say that they are devising theories to explain the evolution of all life and that they are discovering natural processes or mechanisms which can evolve new plants and animals. The burden of proof is up on them trying to give theories to explain evolution and show processes which can produce new plants and