Preview

Crime and Process Model

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
900 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crime and Process Model
CJ 2400
Adjudication Process

Lesson Four

Chapter 5
THE DYNAMICS OF COURTHOUSE JUSTICE

1. Read Chapter 120 - 145.

i. Answer question 4 in Critical Thinking Questions on page 145. Answer may vary. Sample answer provided below.

“In Barker v. Wingo, the Court stressed the legitimate reasons for the 16 trial continuances. But is there a danger that prosecutors might illegitimately seek continuances?”
Answer: No, I don’t believe there is a danger that prosecutors may illegitimately seek continuances, because yes there is always a grave chance that both the prosecutors and defense attorneys will try to exploit or override the system to their party’s advantage. With this in mind it is required that anyone seeking a continuance get granted permission from a judge, with the proper reason and evident evidence. So as long as the judges involved in the case sees fit the danger is lowered. Some continuances are for the better because it gives you time make sure your evidence is correct.

ii. Complete the following web exercise. Explain your answer. Answers may vary.

“Court reform is a topic of constant conversation in legal circles. Do a search on the topic by going to Yahoo: http://www.yahoo.com. Then, under Search, type the phrase court reform. Is court reform needed to protect the values of the crime control model or the values of the due process model?”
Answer: Yes, since the crime model control model and the due process model are two different types of criminal justice, they still go hand in hand with each other. They become the extremes of a continuum. The role of crime control is to get the criminal off the street and to protect the innocent. While the due process model of criminal justice is like an obstacle course, you have to keep going through legal obstacles to ensure in the end you convict the right person. Although both very different from the other there common goal for the criminal justice is to convict the guilty and set

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Fifth Circuit Case Summary

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    After United States v. Vargas-Ocampo, 747 F.3d 299, 301 (5th Cir. 2014), the Fifth Circuit adopted a near summary affirmance in sufficiency of the evidence cases, which has eroded the legal standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt required on each element of an offense to support a conviction. Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199, 201 (1960); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Nsl

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. Summarize the Supreme Court’s changing interpretations of how to protect both the due process rights of accused criminals and to preserve the safety of the community.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zalman, M. (2008). Criminal procedure: Constitution and society, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hurst Error Analysis

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Meeks v. Dugger, 576 So. 2d 713, 716 (Fla. 1991), the petitioner, through proffered evidence, was able to demonstrate exactly how Florida’s unconstitutional pre-Hitchcock capital scheme effected his penalty-phase counsel. This evidence was “sufficient to negate the conclusion that the Hitchcock error was harmless” and this Court remanded his case because “the merits of [Meeks’] claims can only be determined by an evidentiary hearing.” Id. In Hall v. State, 541 So. 2d 1125, 1128 (Fla. 1989), this Court granted relief on evidence preferred outside the original record concerning the effect of the constitutional error on defense counsel, despite the fact that this Court considered the error harmless on the basis of the original record. Appellant is simply seeking the exact same right that this Court has always provided inmates- the ability to develop a record demonstrating the impact of an unconstitutional statute on his trial…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conflict Model Of Crime

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One will learn the definition of a crime throughout this paper. Crime is an act of unacceptable behavior that is recognizable as a violation therefore granted the appropriate punishment. A criminal act can be described as an activity that involves breaking the law, or act considered morally wrong. Crime is an infringement of the law. Any of these examples is considered prohibited by law. In our society when you have crime we need laws to maintain order.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance, if an individual was released upon the fact that they were not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and evidence was uncovered proving their guilt, they are not subject to a retrial because of the double jeopardy clause. This is unquestionably unjust given that this clause protects criminals from lawful imprisonment. Although the verdict may seem just at the time of the initial trial, given the evidence was inconclusive, the presence of uncovered compelling evidence should be admitted…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The contest of strength between the Crime Control Model and the Due Process Model is similar to attempting to satisfy every person, each and every second and no one some of the time. Debates are good for both models, but for all growth on one side, there must be one on the opposing side as well. The Crime Control Model, prosecutor or the police, is not in favor for the Due Process Model, a person, to have more rights than they do. Each and every individual who is a United States citizen should know what his or her rights are.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although advantages of the practice were reviewed, it is still hard to state what a “speedy trial” is. In the case of Barker v. Wingo (407 U.S. 514 [1972]), the defendant is the case felt that this right had been violated after his case was continued 16 times over a five year course. As a result, the Supreme Court determined that this right to a speedy trial is violated when the length and…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    These two objectives are important because they ensure a safe community and a fair trial for all. The courts and the police work together to investigate a crime and apprehend the offender while at the same time ensuring that the accused has their due process. These two objectives can collide when the police want to get an offender off the streets and control crime by charging them even though there is not enough evidence for the court to fully convict. The police choose to control crime by removing an offender from the street and into the system even if it is only for a limited time. On the other hand the courts wish that they didn’t have to shift hopeless cases and get to series ones where a criminal has the potential of a conviction. The true way for these two components to work effectively together is to ensure a thru investigation of every…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some say that crime is increasing, while others argue that crime is decreasing, in any event, it is not stopping and the Criminal Court System plays a crucial part in ensuring the safety of the American people and the communities they live in. The purpose of this paper is to examine and evaluate the development of the different court systems, their purpose and how they interact with each other to keep law and order in America today. This is an explanation of how the early legal codes, common laws, precedents, rules of jurisdiction and interpretation of the law impact the courts of today. In addition, this article will explain the…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Justice Policy

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both policies are implemented the same because they are government funded programs However, the contention appears with regard to who each policy is intended to help. The crime control model is intended to reduce crime by giving greater power to police and the courts. The primary focus of the consensus due process model is the protection and awareness of rights and liberties for individuals by reducing government powers. Both policies receive funds from the government and act on behalf of the government. The difference is that the due process model would prefer less government involvement and greater attention and focus placed on the benefits of Private enterprise. Primarily the goals of both models can be categorized into two very distinct missions: (1) the need to enforce the law and maintain social order, and (2) the need to protect people from injustice (Perron, 2012).…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime is defined as a breach of rules or laws that have been set by the government. Society has been given a set of rules that everyone who believes in good morals, follow. A crime would be anyone who has broken these set of laws for personal reasons such as greed. As of 2006, the crime rate of Toronto was 1,000 per 100,000. This has as shown a decrease since 2002. Crime has become an entity that is a part of society, without it, society would not function correctly. In the study of sociology, crime can be explained in four theoretical perspectives; Functionalism, conflict, interactionism, and feminism.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Criminal Justice Process is designed to keep people safe and ensure suspects and criminals are treated in such a way that follows the Constitution accordingly. The federal justice system carries out this process through a list of steps:…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A crime scenario

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is a hypothetical situation, "It's year XXXX of your specialty. A dead body is discovered in the middle of a well populated area and the overwhelming evidence suggests he was murdered. Is anyone in charge of finding the killer? What is the attitude of the public and is there an expectation of justice?" Redditor LordKettering replies, his setting: 1772: Boston, Massachusetts Bay Colony.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Explanation of Crime

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages

    3.2 Second: Offenders try to make the best decisions they can, given the risks and uncertainty involved…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays