Preview

Criminal Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
523 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Justice
Read the insanity defense articles in the "insanity defense" folder (found in module 2). Summarize the insanity defense in Arizona. What purpose do you think this defense was intended to serve? Do you think the "insanity defense" should exist? Use your module readings to support your answer.

Arizona uses a modified version of the M 'naghten rule (A test for criminal insanity). The defense team is responsible for proving that. The state of Arizona also uses the "Guilty but insane" verdict as well.

I believe the reason the insanity defense is in place is to protect those that are mentally ill and commit crimes.

I do think that the insanity defense should exist- even though only 1/8th of them are successful according to our readings. What I dont like about the insanity defense is declaring someone temporarily insane. I guess I dont see how someone can momentarily be insane and commit a crime. I could see the lack of premeditation and the heat of the moment or self defense but how does that make them temporarily insane? I cannot grasp this concept at all.

Compare and contrast the due process model and the crime prevention model. I am looking for you to summarize the definitions provided in the textbook by paraphrasing (not quoting). Which model is practiced in the United States? How do you know? Explain your answer. Do you think the United States should adopt a different model? Explain your answer.

The crime control or prevention model is about identifying factual guilt, and the due process model is about identifying legal guilt. The example used in the book mentioned that a man stole a womans purse and the officer witnessed the event and chased him down and caught him. From that point the man confessed to committing the crime. This would be considered factual guilt- the officer witnessed it and the man confessed. All the facts are pointing to yes, that the man in fact was guilty of said crime. However, with due process model he was not "legally


References: criminal.findlaw.com http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/the-insanity-defense-among-the-states.html Reichel, Philip Comparative Criminal Justice Systems;chapter 3
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Miller V. Statesupreme Court Case Study
    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miller V. Statesupreme Court Case Study

    Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Nevada, 1996991 P. 2d 1183People in the United States commit crimes and make up excuses why they should not be held accountable for a crime. Insanity and temporary Insanity have significant differences. One might ask themselves is there really any meaningful difference? During the history of our court system there has been many significant court decisions which address the controversy topics of insanity and temporary insanity as it relates to criminal procedures. One of the most significant court decision is Miller Vs State Supreme Court of Nevada, 1996 991 P.2d 1183.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Models Of Crime Deterrence Herbert Packer
    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page

    Models Of Crime Deterrence Herbert Packer

    Herbert Packer has developed two important models of crime deterrence. The first, is referred to as the crime control model, a conservative approach whereby a suspect should be detained or arrested until he or she is proven guilty (Cooper, 2014). The second is referred to as the due process model. According to the basic stipulations of this model, a suspect should be presumed as being innocent until there is adequate evidence to prove that he or she is guilty. This implies that a suspect should not be detained or arrested until the due process of determining his or her involvement in crime is completed. In view of these stipulations, it is evident that the due process model is founded on a liberal approach while the crime control model is founded…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of Dennis Pozniak's Insanity Case
    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of Dennis Pozniak's Insanity Case

    This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mcnaughton's Defense: The Insanity Defense
    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mcnaughton's Defense: The Insanity Defense

    The Insanity defense first came into England’s radar when Daniel McNaughton, who attempted to murder, Prime Minister Robert Peel. McNaughton Rule became a common law test to determine criminal liability in relation to mentally disturbed defendants. Another notable case is that of Reagan, John Hinckley who in 1981 attempted to assassinate the president.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense In The Daniel M Naghten Case
    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Insanity Defense In The Daniel M Naghten Case

    Introduction: The insanity defense has been used for many years and believed to began around the 1720’s where the first formal defense was used in a court in 1724. Judge Tracy, the judge that ruled over the first case coined a term “The wild beast standard” that states “for someone to be insane he must be totally deprived of his understanding and memory, and not know what he is doing anymore than an infant, a brute, or a wild beast” (Neville, 2010, pp.3-4). After the Daniel M’Naghten case, a man who attempted to kill a prime minister due to his belief that the prime minister was conspiring against him ended up killing the secretary, there was a new rule many states began to follow. After M’Naghten was found insane by multiple experts because he was unable to know the difference of right and wrong therefore he was acquitted of all charges (Neville, 2010, p. 5) a rule was developed labeled after M’Naghten.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    The insanity defense is only raised in 1% of cases and then only successful 25% of the time it is used; although its rarity, the legal court has very detailed rules. Most rules describe not guilty by reason of insanity as not being aware of what you were doing in that exact moment. Adam Banner suggests that the Eddie Routh case had an accurate ruling of guilty because of his claim that, “...the disposition is ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’. It is not ‘not guilty by reason of mental illness’,”. Only Mental Health America would disagree, stating, “The Court has indicated that states may be required to provide at least some minimal defense based on mental illness,”. Coincidently, these changes have not been made thus…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ohio Insanity Case Analysis
    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ohio Insanity Case Analysis

    This paper will include what the insanity statutes are in Ohio, the state that I live in. I will also talk about how often the insanity defense is used in the United States. As well as how successful this defense is. I will also discuss if psychologists should give their ultimate opinion in regards to sanity cases as well as the ethical issues that may rise from their opinions. Lastly, I will discuss how difficult it is to provide adequate psychological care for mentally ill patients while they are incarcerated in prison. The care they would have received had they been institutionalized in a mental hospital instead would have resulted in fewer deaths.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Acts and Choice Theories
    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criminal Acts and Choice Theories

    Crime Control model and Due Process Model are two models for society which determine which acts are…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense
    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Should Insanity Defense Be Eliminated
    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why Should Insanity Defense Be Eliminated

    The author of this paper argues several reasons why the insanity plea should be changed or either eliminated. The reasons are considered and supported by evidence. The conclusion states that insanity should be altered or eliminated for the safety and well being of society.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Due Process vs. Crime Control
    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due Process vs. Crime Control

    The Due Process Model emphasizes the adversary system. The Due Process model also puts on emphasis on the rights of the person or people who are being accused of a crime. The Due Process model consists of many factors but a few are the idea of aggressive police enforcement, equitable and fair-minded judicial process, and imposition of proper and reasonable punishment. The main idea encompassing the model of Due Process is to make sure that people who are innocent are not being wrongly convicted or targeted. The Due process Model suggests that society and the judicial process should engage in considerable efforts to protect those who may be wrongly accused. It is important to keep in mind that there is the argument that the due process model focuses more upon the rights of the accused instead of the rights of victims.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Insanity Defense
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Insanity Defense

    So does a person who committed crime can use insanity defense as an excuse for his/her actions? Insanity defense can be a possible escape to a crime but in order to affirm that the defense of insanity or the insanity plea. Critics argue that some defendants misuse it, effectively faking insanity to win a release or less severe convictions. The controversy of this debate will never end. The insanity defense reflects the perception that the person who cannot be liable of their actions should not be punished for criminal…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Not Guilty: Horrest Insanity
    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not Guilty: Horrest Insanity

    Many people wrongly believe that there are only two ways to plead in trial, guilty and not guilty. There is also another way to plead, that most people use to try and escape any criminal responsibility, pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. Not guilty by reason of insanity refers to the defense of offenders not to deny the commission of the crime, but to assert they lacked the capacity to understand the nature of the crime or that it was wrong (Allen). The definition of pleading legally insane can differ from each state, country or jurisdiction. This is usually abused and pleaded wrongly. Therefore it is very difficult to be found not guilty this way. A study carried out in the USA found that the insanity defense is only used in about 1% of all court cases and is only successful in about 26% of those cases (New York Times). The jury must discover if the plea were true or not based on extreme psychiatric testimonies and usually lengthy trials. A prime example of this is in the murder of Elena Steinberg, also known as the sleepwalk murder. In this murder Steven Steinberg was found not guilty on reasons of temporary insanity.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Insanity And Pleas Insanity
    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Insanity And Pleas Insanity

    People assume that everyone who commits a crime and pleas insanity is using it as a way to get out of the crime they committed, especially murder. What most do not know is how hard it is to actually be convicted of Insanity. When someone is convicted of insanity, that also does not mean they are off the hook. Most if not all face a longer sentence then if they did not get convicted of insanity. What exactly does insanity mean? “Insanity is the legal term that refers to a mental disease or defect that impairs the reason and or will to control actions.” (Samaha,2015, pg209) There are two cases that I am going to talk about that both plead insanity but both had different results. The case of Andrea Yates and Eddie Ray Routh, two very big cases that happened years apart from each other in Texas…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    Criminal defense is such an important part of the trial process. The defense is important because it can help the attorney’s client to get little to almost no time in jail or prison. The most important but also difficult part of the process is figuring out what defense to use and what defense not to use. Out of the many defenses that are used, only one stands out: the insanity defense.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics