Preview

Criminal Justice and Punishment Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Justice and Punishment Essay
Sentencing and punishment essay in achieving justice The main purpose of the criminal justice system is to prevent crimes and to protect citizens from the wrong doings of others and to keep society in a stable and working order. Throughout Australia, sentencing is the final unambiguous act given from the court to the offender as their result of punishment. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) is apparent to be one of the main core of statutory guidelines in relation to the sentencing procedure in NSW. The law itself explores the type of penalties, purposes of punishment, clarifies that prison is the last resort and discusses the limitations on penalties. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) characterises all the various factors which have to be considered during the act of sentencing, for example, mitigating and aggravating factors such as the evidence in which is presented by the circumstance of the crime and or the character of the offender, as well as the state of mind in which the offender was under. This essay will further highlight the effectiveness of sentencing and punishment to an extent as for the ineffectiveness of the issue as well.
The main purpose of the criminal justice system is to prevent crimes and to protect citizens from the wrong doings of others and to keep society in a stable and working order. Throughout Australia, sentencing is the final unambiguous act given from the court to the offender as their result of punishment. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) is apparent to be one of the main core of statutory guidelines in relation to the sentencing procedure in NSW. The law itself explores the type of penalties, purposes of punishment, clarifies that prison is the last resort and discusses the limitations on penalties. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) characterises all the various factors which have to be considered during the act of sentencing, for example, mitigating and aggravating
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Assess the Effectiveness of Law Reform in Addressing the Issues Around Native Title and Sexual Assault
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the Effectiveness of Law Reform in Addressing the Issues Around Native Title and Sexual Assault

    The law reforms made during the R v Skaf case led to more just outcomes for future sexually assaulted victims, but the lack of law reforms for sentencing and parole periods does not achieve justice for the victims. The Meagher Case led the public to question the justice system and gave rise to law reform in certain parts of Australia. The “Meagher killer was on parole for sex attacks” media article questions the ability of the Parole Board and the belief of rehabilitation. The Victorian Parole Board however, released a statement “that anybody on parole charged with violent or sex offences would have their parole automatically cancelled.” This minor law reform in Victoria will prove effective as they will disallow criminals with…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Mandatory Sentencing Be Introduced in Australia?
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should Mandatory Sentencing Be Introduced in Australia?

    The sentencing system should not be altered, for decreasing the focus and increasing the frequency of sentencing would do more harm than good. An emphasis on merely punishment and retribution in criminal sentencing would prevent the right of an offender to a fair trial. Furthermore, set and compulsory sentencing ignores personal circumstances, which in some cases could make all the difference. With these aggravating factors, hardening the system of law will not bring any advantages to society.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Bugmy v The Queen
    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Bugmy v The Queen

    The touchstone of criminal sentencing is the notion of individualised justice.2 Consequently, the Australian judiciary is required to exercise its sentencing discretion while having regard to all the circumstances relevant to the offence and the offender.3 Hence in the context of sentencing indigenous offenders, where it is related to the offence, the indigenous circumstances will provide a relevant context for mitigating the sentence.4 The seminal case of R v Fernando5 (“Fernando”) adumbrated the oft-cited Fernando principles6 which comprehensively set out the considerations when sentencing indigenous offenders. Key amongst these considerations is the relevance of indigenous background, poverty and alcoholism to mitigation. Subsequently, the Fernando principles have had varying degrees of influence in the sentencing jurisprudence across the other states,7 the general trend being a reduction in length of imprisonment terms as compared to non-indigenous offenders in statistically similar circumstances.8…

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Sentencing
    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Sentencing

    Keeping in mind the brief overview of each of the major rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin, the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering, and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences is that by increasing the likelihood of custody, it will be a strict deterrent for crime prevention and a response to political “tough on crime” strategies. It was also thought to minimize…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Is Australia's Nine Sentencing
    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Why Is Australia's Nine Sentencing

    Australia has nine sentencing jurisdictions with each jurisdiction possessing its own criminal justice system. Federal, state and territory criminal legislation generally specify offences with a prescribed maximum penalty which allows a court to determine an appropriate punishment in the particular circumstances of that case. In recent years, the Australian Parliament has increased proclaimed power over sentencing, setting a fixed or consistent penalty for committing a certain offence. This upsurge suggests that there is a public desire for tougher sentencing laws and dissatisfaction in the community with the traditional sentencing system where courts have had a broad discretion to punish offenders. The results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing shows that the majority of respondents expressed high levels of dissatisfaction and were displeased with sentences that are imposed by the courts.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Australian Criminal Law
    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Australian Criminal Law

    The codification of the Criminal Code has marked a watershed on Australian legal jurisprudence. In this essay I will discuss the problems that may occur when interpreting the Criminal Code (The Code), the creation of uniformity and the also accessibility that the Code creates.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    NSW Criminal Justice System
    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    NSW Criminal Justice System

    The NSW criminal justice system relates to all areas associated with the law and law enforcement, including those who are incarcerated, on probation, or suspected of committing a criminal offence. In evaluating the effectiveness of the criminal justice system in NSW there are three issues which can be considered; alternatives to gaol, charge negotiation and the role of the courts. These issues promote or demote the effectiveness of the NSW criminal justice system, especially when evaluated in terms of equality, accessibility, resource efficiency, and the balance of rights for victims, offenders and society. These issues are also discussed widely in the media, which presents…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report
    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Court Report

    [ 3 ]. David Brown et al, Criminal Laws: Material and commentary on Criminal Law and Process of New South Wales, 5th Ed, Sydney, The Federation Press, 2011 p. 143…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing
    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    Several different objectives exist in sentencing, including “deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and retribution” (2012). Retribution is a sentencing objective that has proven to be the most effective in…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Justice Reforms
    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Criminal Justice Reforms

    within the court of public opinion, other measures will most certainly be hindered if not…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Trial Process
    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Trial Process

    The criminal trial process is a vital part of the criminal justice system in NSW as it plays a fundamental role in achieving justice, by determining the innocence or guilt of an offender. Yet, despite the criminal trial process still having many complex issues that remove it of achieving its full means of justice, the process has stood the test of time and lasted for more than two centuries. It aims at lawfully and justly providing victims, offenders and society with the rights of a fair trial. The hierarchies of courts play a crucial role in effectuating justice for the community. The courts jurisdiction is the extent of the court’s authority and is often determined by the hierarchy. The lowest form of court is the Local Court. The Local Court Act 1982 (NSW) outlines the offences that are heard in this court. They are less serious crimes, where matters are tried summarily, but are also the location for bail and committal hearings, where police play a prominent role in achieving justice. The Intermediate and High Courts handle indictable crimes as well as appeals from lower courts. It is in these courts that a decision made sets a doctrine of precedent. The court hierarchy is a major part of the criminal trial process as it allows appeals and precedents to flow easily. It attempts to ensure consistency between judicial decisions, as well as limit the discretion on most judicial verdicts. Appeals and precedents fundamentally ensure efficiency and the effectiveness of achieving justice, but despite them being an effective measure in achieving justice, there are still cheaper and more cost-efficient methods, such as YJC, and Circle Sentencing, that can fulfill the same outcome. The cornerstone of Australia’s criminal trial process is the Adversary System. This refers to the legal procedure where two opposing sides argue a case before an independent, third party eg.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    mandatory minimum sentence
    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    mandatory minimum sentence

    A mandatory minimum sentence occurs when judicial discretions are limited by law (Famm). Those who are convicted of certain crimes must be punished with at least the minimum number of years depending on the offense. Amanda Dollak who received her criminal justice degree at CTU, states “Mandatory sentences require every individual to receive the same punishment for similar offenses, regardless of how much a judge may object to the sentence”. These mandatory sentencing laws however vary from state to state, and in other countries. In 1994 California introduced a policy called “3 strikes you’re out”, which meant after a third criminal conviction the arrested person would be sentenced to life in prison (Friedman 109). Soon after California enacted its policy, other states and countries also adopted similar policies. Since then other forms of mandatory sentencing have been established for example, in Britain the mandatory minimum sentence after a third conviction for burglary, is three years in prison (Carrillo). Today there are now mandatory minimum sentences for all types of crimes including possession of a weapon, drugs, and rape.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess the role discretion plays in the sentencing and punishment of offenders
    • 1161 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the role discretion plays in the sentencing and punishment of offenders

    Sentencing and punishment has actively involved the discretion of judges and magistrates in affecting the decision of the sentencing. Discretion involves the power of Judges and magistrates to determine the most appropriate sentence for a case. Allowing judicial officers to decide sentences on a case by case basis and thus permitting them to take into account the various circumstances. Many factors influence the role discretion plays or alternatively doesn’t play in the sentencing and punishment of offenders. This includes statutory guidelines, mandatory sentencing, aggravating and mitigating circumstances and the use of victim impact statements.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil and Criminal Procedure
    • 14152 Words
    • 57 Pages

    Civil and Criminal Procedure

    Attempts to restrict judicial discretion have changed the face of sentencing and punishment in NSW…

    • 14152 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fixed Punishments for Crime
    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fixed Punishments for Crime

    Topic: Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics