Preview

Criminal Justice Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
826 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Justice Paper
Case Paper

I went to a case in Peoria, Illinois at the Peoria County Courthouse. The case that I observed was not the first that I have seen there and actually the first case I saw there was similar to the one that I had saw for my Business Law class. The case that I saw was Sate vs. Wilkers and the charge that was brought to him was 1st degree murder. The first case I went to was also a 1st degree murder but it happened a little differently then the way this one happened. There were not many people in the courtroom really just the family of the person that was murdered and I think the reason that it was that way is because the shooting was gang related. It was pretty easy to fond a trial in Peoria because they have one of the highest crime rates in Illinois, but also because gangs are known in Peoria. The first case I had ever gone to was definitely gang related because it happened in a shooting involving two gangs. One thing I noticed was that another state attorney, I think, followed every witness out that testified against Wilkers. Which was a little weird but I am not sure if that is done regularly or there was a reason why he followed just them out. I missed the opening statements but obviously they did not have a plea bargain and Wilkers obviously pleaded not guilty. The case that they were bringing was that Quemont Wilkers was being charged with murdering Demarious Robertson in a drive by gang related shooting. The reason that Wilkers was being charged with this crime is because two days earlier these two had supposedly got in a scuffle after a high school basketball game. Now the two schools that these kids are from are both very rough schools, and right now one of them may be shut down for not having the enrollment that they need. Peoria High is were Wilkers is from and Robertson is from Woodruff, and these two schools are actually thinking about combining at this time because of the low enrollment, and bad funds. Now not only did

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The court case was about The Ransom Of Red Chief. The teams defended the witnesses such as Red Chief, Sam, Bill. The prosecuting team believed that Bill didn’t get kidnapped by those two kidnappers. The defense team believed that Bill was mentally challenged and Red Chief did harm his kids and abuse the cat. The prosecuting team said that Red Chief was hounded down by those two kidnappers and lured in by some candy that they had hidden. They conjointly believed that they put her in a bag and yielded her into a little shed. The prosecuting team won the case by way of evidence. I believe that the defense team should have won by way of evidence from the trial.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: miller, r. l. (2003). handbook of selected court cases, for gaines and millr 's criminal justice in action, 2nd edition. arlington: wadsworth thomson learning.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That the students in the Tinker case were protesting and in the Hazelwood case they believed that their rights got taken away.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The case of Jodi Arias (Defendant) Case CR2008-031021-001 ("Criminal Court Case Information - Case History", 2014) vs State of Arizona on the murder of Travis Alexander (Victim), the modern day story of sex, lies, violence, and revenge. The trial of State of Arizona vs Jodi Arias is being tried in the Maricopa County Superior Court ("Criminal Court Case Information - Case History", 2014); the following paper outlines the process that follows in the criminal investigation up to the final stage. I have listened to nearly 12 hours of testimony from the key players that I have listed, from the courthouse in Maricopa County. When this particular case first was reported I remember finding it very interesting and was following the progress for some time. I recently became aware that this trial is still in the final sentencing after numerous jury dismissals, mistrials, hung jury, allegations of perjury, prosecution wrongdoing, and defense cover-ups.…

    • 3876 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Officer Jane Roberts got pregnant by the FTO, Andrew Tibbets. The FTO is not willing to leave his wife and now will not have anything to do with Officer Jane Roberts. There was a confrontation and Sergeant Williams witnessed it but never mentioned it to either one of them, thinking that they could take care of it themselves. Well, since the FTO now wants nothing to do with Officer Roberts, she went to Sergeant Williams to let him know what was going on between the two of them. She told him that she was pregnant and that the baby was Officer Tibbets. The Sergeant informed her that she would have…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom 302

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A very significant case in Cook County Courts was the Bridgeport case, known as a “heater” case because of the publicity that surround it, and the racial overtones (Bogira 181). The Bridgeport case involved three white teenagers, Michael Kwidzinski, Jasas, and Caruso that were accused of brutally beating two young black boys who were riding their bikes in the predominantly white neighborhood. The entire summary of the case, in Courtroom 302, was based around the fact that one of the boys, Michael Kwidzinski, was most likely innocent. The question then turns to the boy himself, Michael Kwidzinski; if he was innocent, why did hid then accept a guilty plea bargain?…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zachary Deal Case Study

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are many different variables and angles which you can take. I agree with the ruling for a number of reasons, however, I also feel that the parents were not fully cooperating like they could have to achieve the best results possible. In the one article I read it actually addresses how many could “think” that the school district is the victim, but in all actuality if you read the full court transcripts you will see that is simply not the case. The article was written by the Deal 's attorney so it is biased, but it makes some very good points. I am not quite sure how to draw the line in how much should be expected from the school system and at what point a family is demanding too much. Obviously I am not the only one who thinks this is confusing or there would be more concrete federal laws. On one hand I feel that the most important thing to keep in mind is parental rights. Who else is going to fight for a child like their own parents? If parents are denied proper notification, proper time to plan to attend the meeting, supply the materials in the…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Steve Arey and Terry Jordan were young, inexperienced lawyers who should have never even been considered for a capital case. Judge Persin, the presiding Judge in the case, however, decided on these two gentlemen because other more experienced lawyers refused to take the case because of the huge financial sacrifice it would require. Albeit public speculation that Judge Persin's previous profession as a prosecutor had led him to heavily favor the prosecution, his decision stood. The two prosecutors who Arey and Jordan would be opposed by were Mickey McGlothlin and Tom Scott. Both prosecutors had far more experience than the defense lawyers, but that didn't stop Judge Persin from appointing Arey and Jordan to the case. It was an obvious mismatch, intentional or not, and was just the beginning of many problems that would arise for the defendant's case.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There just seems to be a general lack of relevant background information in this case. There are only the two witnesses, and even their stories have some doubt surrounding them. Furthermore, none of the jurors (as far as we know) have any significant background in dealing with these matters.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The American Criminal Justice System is a well orchestrated and cooperative performance with the professional courtroom actors and others all playing their parts in the administration of justice. This paper will look at a very important group of individuals the courtroom work group. Each person acts as one of the cogs in the machine, all cooperating to reach a common goal. This paper will describe what a courtroom work group is, who is in a courtroom work group and what they each do. The role of the prosecutor will also be described and how they determine which cases to pursue, and what would happen if the criteria for the prosecution of cases were more lenient or stringent. Lastly, this paper will describe the effects of the criminal justice funnel and the backlog of cases on the American court systems and the courtroom work group. Are there any solutions to help eliminate the funnel and help reduce the backlog of cases? To get an answer to that question, a review of the how this important group works will have to be understood.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal justice is a profession that is widely known around the world. Many people dream about pursuing a career in the law enforcement field. The law enforcement field like any other profession has its own terminology, to be effective as a police officer, lawyer, or detective a person must have a good general knowledge of the law enforcement field terminology. This paper will explain and define some law enforcement terms such as Pseudospeciation, social constructions, bigotry, racism, hegemony, disparity, and discrimination.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Melrose

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Your honor, opposing counsel, my name is Lamin Johnson, the prosecutor representing the state of Illinois. Larry Mabry stole Gary Roper’s watch, and then Gary Roper went back to the Sharks’ clubhouse and told the rest of the boys around 2:00 PM on October 11th, 2013 and he tried to get the rest of his gang members riled up, his exact words were “Let’s go get Mabry, he stole my wrist watch, we should go mess him up real good.” Roper knew that Dennis Moran was carrying a gun that day because when they were in the clubhouse Dennis Moran showed them the gun, Gary Roper even “ooed and aahed” about it. Dennis Moran also stated “Let’s go teach those Jets a lesson” and he kept on repeating those words over and over again, which shows that shooting the victim Larry Mabry was premeditated. Three hours later they went out to go look for Larry Mabry they saw the Jets at the corner of 27th and Miller and then the conflict erupted. Everybody started yelling and screaming at each other. Before too long the Jets were chasing the Sharks. Three gunshots were fired during the chase. While the Sharks were running, Dennis Moran pulled out the gun turned around and shot Larry Mabry twice in the chest and abdomen, let it show that Dennis Moran was not running away, if he had enough time to shoot that accurately. Let it show that Dennis Moran stated that he saw Larry Mabry with an alleged gun and claimed to have “run like crazy” to get out of there. However Dennis Moran did not see the alleged gun that Larry Mabry had because Dennis Moran did not have time to pull this alleged gun out, he only reached for his pocket and that’s when Dennis Moran shot Larry Mabry twice. Later that night Officer O’Toole arrested Dennis Moran and Larry Mabry. “In this problem, Gary Roper and Dennis Moran are accused if murder in the shooting death of Larry Mabry. Dennis Moran claims self-defense and Gary Roper will argue against accountability for…

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Undoubtedly, juvenile delinquency is very representative since the last century. Juvenile delinquency is one of the criminological problems that is growing every day, not only in our country but also worldwide, is one of the socially negative actions that will otherwise fixed by law and morality created and accepted by society. Juvenile crime has increased dramatically in recent times, becoming an issue of growing social most concern, both for its quantitative increase, for their progressive qualitative hazard. Juvenile crime is also a feature of societies that have reached a certain level of prosperity. The phenomenon of violence is very…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fred is drunk and driving his dad’s car. Fred is a 21 year old student at Columbia College. Fred rams into a parked car at 10th and Rogers. Thinking no one saw him; Fred moves his car and parks it on an adjacent lot. He sprints to his dorm room in Miller Hall. A neighbor saw the wreck and Fred running to the dorm. Police are called and they arrive ten minutes after the wreck. The officers see several empty beer cans and a bottle of tequila (half full) in the front seat. The tags are traced to Fred’s dad, who is called by police. Dad says that Fred is a student at Columbia College. Police run Fred's record and determine that he has two prior DWIs within the past five years. The third DWI in 10 years is a felony. Police contact Columbia College security who leads them to Fred’s dorm. Fred is passed out, so security lets them in. The officers smell intoxicants, give Fred some Field Sobriety tests (he fails) and confirm that he was driving the car. Fred is arrested for DWI. It is his third offense, a felony under Missouri law. Fred is given a breath test, which registers at .13 on the scale. During the processing of his arrest paperwork, the officers search Fred’s possessions which he brought to the station, and a small quantity of cocaine is found in Fred’s pocket. Fred is charged with DWI, leaving the scene, and possession of cocaine. What issues do you see? How should they be resolved? (50 points)…

    • 6313 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Better Essays