Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Criminal Law

Better Essays
1229 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Law
Courtroom Paper

People always wonder, what makes this country so great? More than often people disagree with the answer given to that question. Some say it’s the freedom of speech that we have. Others will say that it’s our ability to vote and elect who we want to lead us. This is all well and good, but what really sets our country apart from many others is our right to a speedy and public trial of our peers. Some governments in other parts of the world reserve the right to take any citizen right off of the street and place him or her in jail with no other reason than a faulty witness who, more often times than not, is being pressured to bear false judgment against them. In our court system, there are many components that are in place to insure our citizens have a fair trial. I think the purpose of our country’s cornerstone of the American criminal justice system. Definitely being the most common punishment for serious criminal offenses.
In ancient times, trials were held in massive courts and there was usually a fair length of time that separated each one. In today’s time, though, we have the means to hold several trials a day in any courtroom and the trials can cover a multitude of crimes at any given time.
The other day, I had the privilege of watching our fair judicial system at work. I came to find out about the trial through my friend Polly Kohler. Polly, a bankruptcy lawyer, is normally very up to date and aware of the criminal trials each day. In the court case that I attended, the defendant Rafael Rocado was passed his preliminary hearing. Rafael Rocado was charged with the possession of heroin as a juvenile. When I attended Rafael Rocado’s trial, Rafael and his attorney Mr. Trumbakas were looking for extended time the time of the trail due to there not being enough evidence to keep Rafael in juvenile prison. They were looking for extended time for further evaluation of Rafael’s possession case. The trial started in the afternoon around 1:30. Since he was unable to afford an attorney, the judge provided her with a public defender. I found this to be a very interesting case for many reasons.
One reason that I was incredibly amazed at is that it was a case involving a juvenile being arrested for the possession of heroin. Now I’m aware that this isn’t exactly that uncommon around the United States, but I must mention that Rafael was only seventeen years old at the time of the trial. I couldn’t help but feel that this was wrong. It’s understandable to see adults in these types of cases but I always feel sorry to hear that a young juvenile would put himself in such a horrible situation. After hearing the background information on the situation, though, I began to take notice that this teen got himself in this situation. Although there wasn’t enough evidence, which prolonged the case, I had the privilege to talk to one of Rafael’s family members after the hearing. According to his mother, Mary Rocado, Rafael put himself in this situation after time and time again being involved with gang members.
This type of situation seems to occur often when there is a family currently having financial issues. Most of the time when a child is growing up in a home, living in poverty level, the child starts to affiliate with people who wish to have more respect, money, and power. This is where they start to reside to gangs. The option of becoming a gang member brings you all of these so called attributes. But the downfall of it all is that it’s strictly illegal.
After going to this hearing I did myself some research on addiction and the outcome of an addiction to heroin. Addiction is a physical, psychological and physiological state that is as a result of dependence on substances that are psychoactive. These substances are known to cross the barrier between blood and brain when they are taken into the body either through smoking, drinking, injection or any other means that may cause their entry into the body. These substances work by altering the normal functioning of the brain and results in what is often called 'getting high'. The addiction develops when an individual cannot stay for prolonged periods of time without relying on the psychoactive substance that they are addicted to. An addiction may also include habits or behavior patterns that with time become ingrained in our day to day lives and which an individual eventually finds out that they cannot live without indulging in their particular habit or behavior. Though the involvement in the activity or substance is initially a means to seek bliss and enjoyment, after a while, the individual will need to engage in the substance or activity to feel that he or she is normal.
Correctional facilities today lack the ability and programs to rehab the criminals that are held in prison for a long period of time, this seems to be a reoccurring issue. Any person can predict that a prisoner that is held in prison for two, four, ten or fifteen years, then released, will back out into our society with no education or working skills. Giving that ex-con every reason to go back out and commit more crimes. Another reason is that most inmates have had little discipline. They happen to be very insecure and at war with themselves as well as with society. The fact is that a moral value isn’t learned nor do they learn to follow everyday norms.
People believe that if we want to rehab criminals we must do more than just send them to prison for many years, expecting them to learn their lesson with time behind bars. But we must take action in helping them acquire job skills while in prison; which will highly improve their chances of being a productive citizen of their community upon their release. This kind of program would provide skills and habits replacing the sense of hopelessness that many inmates have. The hopelessness comes from the time spent in jail.
The level of the criminal court was the Court of Common Pleas in the Central Court of Reading, PA. When I attended this court case there were multiple players present in the court room including the judge, three sheriffs (John Vroman, Heather Kasperzewski, and Dustin Thorton), the defendant (Rafael Rocado), the defense attorney (Mr. Trumbakas), and the court staff. No one testified in this case though because they weren’t at the level of the case yet which will resume in the early weeks of May. In regards to the hearing some of my concerns were the possibilities of this young man still being able to be innocent. Rafael is an young individual who I believe needs to attend juvenile prison for a period of time in order to understand the wrongdoings that he committed. In most cases, young adults who are let go will often times just go back and commit the same crime, over and over again. The crime Rafael Rocado committed isn’t a simple offense. This offense of possession of heroin and intent to sell is bad wrongdoing and can easily be distributed to the wrong individuals throughout out city.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The sentencing judge found that it was established beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent, after finding out that Flick was pregnant, that the course of terminating the offspring by any means in his power, either consensual or otherwise was going to be taken and was part of his thought process during the course of Flicks pregnancy up to the events on the 20th of August 2002. Mens Rea in this case concerning a guilty mind in regards to King has been proven by the actions that led to the assault. It has been stated before the court that King sought an abortion upon the beginning of the pregnancy, determining his disagreement towards the life of the child, and his outlook towards the future of the pregnancy, also being emphasised during his conversations involving Jessica Williams and Brianne McCarthy offering them a payment of $500.00 if they would ‘bash’ Flick as long as it resulted in the death of the baby. His honour concluded that this course of actions was evident in his previous actions, therefore proving a guilty mind.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prosecuting those who commit crimes is very important to the overall wellbeing of society and the citizens within society. Prosecuting and convicting criminals not only prevents them from committing another crime, it also serves as a deterrent to others that may be considering breaking the law. Many courts make up the judicial branch and these courts are responsible for applying laws made by the government. The courts are made up of courtroom workgroups that are the basis of the courts proceedings.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During this paper I am going to be covering topics such as the courtroom work groups, the role of a prosecutor, the effects of the criminal justice funnel and the backlog of cases on the court system and the courtroom work group. Topics such as these are important to cover so that each individual has a complete understanding of the pros and cons of systems in the judicial system.…

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trial process is one of the most important parts of the criminal justice system. The part where the person accused of committing a crime is either cleared or held accountable for his or her actions. There are several people whose job is to make sure that the process runs smoothly.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroups

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion, I feel I have explained the basic elements and operations of a sociocultural system known as a courtroom workgroup. I have also learned why there is not very many trials, and when there is one, why it is such a big…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay will discuss the differences in the ‘real’ courtroom, versus the ‘fictional’ courtroom, which is the depiction most of us are exposed to. In order to accurately compare the differences between the two different courtrooms, a brief summary of each must be presented. Once each of these is portrayed, an attempt to compare and contrast the two styles and the differences that exist between them can be discussed.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Broken Windows Theory

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Criminal Justice System is a necessary aspect of American life. America is known for being the land of the free. If you are living in America you have something called “rights”. Rights as a U.S. citizen are based off “The Bill of Rights” in the United States Constitution. The Constitution clearly states the rights that each and every American citizen are entitled to. Most of the population don’t quite understand how many rights they actually do have as an American. With freedom and rights in our citizens’ defense, it’s only natural that more crimes occur and the criminals become incarcerated. But, did you ever think maybe the innocent get put behind bars all because they did not understand their rights? I have the perfect example which forever changed American history and those wrongfully accused; it’s the case of Gideon v. Wainwright.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most important source of law is the United States Constitution. The United States Constitution is the foundation of both federal and state laws. The United States Constitution also protects us the people, particularly the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791. One amendment that I feel is most relevant today in criminal law is Amendment VI Right to Speedy Trial, Confrontation of Witnesses. According to (Mount, 2011) Amendment VI states “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence”. Tom Head wrote (Head, 2012) “The "speedy trial" clause is intended to prevent long-term incarceration and detention without trial--which amounts to a prison sentence without a guilty verdict”. If you were to prolong a trial, over time evidence can become lost, witnesses could and would forget facts, and an innocent person could end up doing time for a crime he did not commit. It is in the best interest of both the prosecution and the defense to have a speedy trial so that the proper facts and evidence can stay fresh. The right to a public trial assures the defendant that a fair hearing can take place. Allowing the public to view a trial helps reduce the risk of an unfair or a bias trial. An impartial jury of the state would be a jury that is not bias and comes from the state and district of which the crime took place. Head (Head, 2012) stated “Not only must jury members not have…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inside Criminal Law

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first main function of criminal law is protect and punish. It is also known as the legal function. The main function of this legal function is to uphold social order by protecting the citizens from criminal harm. There are two types of criminal harm. The first is harm caused to individual people both to themselves and their property. These crimes can be from murder, assault, theft or even arson. The second harm can be cause to everyone by unsafe foods, contaminated city drinking water, poorly maintained sewage and unsafe buildings.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal justice

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Which of the answers below is not a criminal law that Congress may enact under the commerce clause?…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a number of individuals who make up the courtroom personnel. Each individual whether it be the judge, bailiff, court reporter, courtroom clerk, prosecutor, defense counsel, jury, defendant, or witness contribute to the shaping of legal law. The judge who presides over the trial has the ultimate authority in the courtroom. “The judge must see that the trail is conducted in an orderly manner according to prescribed rules and laws covering the selection of the jury, the presentation of evidence, the arguments of the lawyers, the instructions to the jury, and the rending of the verdict” (Arizona Judicial Branch, 2013, para. 1). Although the judge has the ultimate authority in the courtroom the bailiff is tasked with keeping order during trial or hearings. The bailiff announces entry of the judge, supervises the jury, and calls witnesses…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal justice

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Intent is when a individual has sufficient mens rea ( mental state) to commit a crime with a aim or purpose. Intent is the state of ones mind at the time then followed by action.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Justice

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jessie Misskelley’s signed a Miranda waiver on tape before he was interrogated by Detective Ridge. His confession is not admissible under Iowa law on “Miranda” voluntariness, but I do not believe that the evidence supports his confession. In the case of State of IOwa, Appellee v. Jimmie Lee HODGES page 347, Hodges confessed to the crime that he was accused of after the police officer “suggested that by confessing the defendant would receive better treatment and less severe punishment than if he denied guilt and stood trial.” An officer can tell a suspect that it is better to the truth, but in this case the line seemed to be crossed if the officer also tells the suspect what advantage is to be gained or is likely from making a confession. When the officer provided special treatment to the defendant, he destroyed the voluntary nature of the confession in the eyes of the law. Misskelley refused to testify against Echols and Baldwin even though he was offered a deal in reduction time in his jail sentence.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Justice

    • 4606 Words
    • 19 Pages

    When someone is paroled, they serve part of their sentence under the supervision of their community. The law says that the U.S. Parole Commission may grant parole if (a) the inmate has substantially observed the rules of the institution; (b) release would not depreciate the seriousness of the offense or promote disrespect for the law; and (c) release would not jeopardize the public welfare.…

    • 4606 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Intensive probation supervision is a type of intermediate sanction involving small probation caseloads and strict monitoring on a daily or weekly basis. With this type of probation supervision, the offender is released from prison and they have to report once a week and the probation officer comes out to check on him or her on a daily or weekly basis. This type of probation can keep an offender on the right track because when the probation officer comes out they have to be there unless they have a job then they are excused. Most probation officers don’t want the offender using alcohol or any other type of drug. I think that this is a pretty good probation supervision.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays