• Question 1
1 out of 1 points
As the common law developed, personal property generally consisted largely of tangible items.
Answer
Selected Answer:
True
Correct Answer:
True • Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Only a few states now have statutes broadening the scope of common-law larceny.
Answer
Selected Answer:
False
Correct Answer:
False • Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Sally gave her mechanic a check for $300 in payment for car repairs. The bank dishonored her check because her account balance was less than $200. Sally could be prosecuted for uttering a forged instrument.
Answer
Selected Answer:
False
Correct Answer:
False • Question 4
1 out of 1 points
A mere trespass to land or personal property was not a crime at common law unless it was committed forcibly or maliciously.
Answer
Selected Answer:
True
Correct Answer:
True • Question 5
1 out of 1 points
The value of the property taken does not usually affect the degree of the crime of robbery, as it does that of theft.
Answer
Selected Answer:
True
Correct Answer:
True • Question 6
1 out of 1 points
In a prosecution for grand theft of the first or second degree the state must prove the value of the goods stolen. Which of the following are relevant in determining value?
Answer
Selected Answer:
d.
All of these
Correct Answer:
d.
All of these • Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Most jurisdictions have enacted statutes making it a crime to burn any property with the intent to defraud an insurance company, usually requiring the prosecution to prove _____.
Answer
Selected Answer:
a. the defendant’s specific intent to defraud
Correct Answer:
a. the defendant’s specific intent to defraud • Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is not an example of forgery under modern criminal statutes?
Answer
Selected Answer:
b.
A