Criminal Justice 500
Criminal Proceeding Project Part 1
Court
Bucks County Courthouse
55 East Court Street
Doylestown PA 18901
Case
MJ-07109-CR-0000096-2014 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Nicholas Todd Helman
Date of trial
November 17, 2014
Defendant
Helman, Nicholas
Attorney
King, Christina A
Judge
Rubenstein, Alan M
Charges
1) Criminal Attempt – Murder in the First Degree
2) Aggravated Assault
3) Risking Catastrophe
4) Stalking – Repeatedly Communicating to Cause Fear
5) Terroristic Threats With Intent to Terrorize Another
6) Terroristic Threats Cause Serious Public Inconvience
7) Simple Assualt
8) Possessing Instrument of Crime with Intent
9) Recklessly Endangering Another Person
10) Harrassment – Communication. Lewd, Threatening, Ect. Language,
Brief summary of case
After a series of threatening phone calls to the victim, Mr. Helman sent a birthday card laced with ricin to his ex-girlfriend’s boyfriend. He admitted to his attempt to one of his co-workers and they informed the police. His trial is November 17, 2014.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
I believe that officer Smith did have every reason to pull over the car in question because there was not only the appearance of a broken tail light that had been taped up but also the car resembled a vehicle that had been used in the commission of another crime, that being the road side killing of another officer. Officer Smith’s observation that the vehicle may be the one in question from the killing of the other officer, she has every right to ask the occupant of the car to get out for a pat down for not only her safety but the safety of any others. Even though the woman didn’t have any weapons on her the officer didn’t know and that’s why she requested the pat down. Had the woman been carrying any weapons when the officer approached the car the officers life would have been in immediate danger so the officer error on the side of caution and did the right thing with the pat down.…
- 828 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Yes, a victim can sue his/or her offender, after the rape has occurred the victim can proceed civilly, even if there were no criminal charges filed. Brody, et al., (2008) it is helpful if criminal charges were filed because convictions for criminal cases make it much easier to predetermine liability in civil cases. In other words, if there is a guilty verdict, then there is no need to litigate liability for a civil case because the civil burden of proof is lower than the criminal burden. Brody, et al., (2008)…
- 574 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the 1993 Missouri court case Ropers v. Simmons, Christopher Simmons (17 y/o), accompanied by his two friends Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer, devised a plan to kill Shirley Cook. The full plan was to commit burglary and homicide by breaking and entering the residence, tying up the woman, and tossing the victim off a bridge (We the People). The night of the murder the three met at midnight, Tessmer later decided to drop out of the plan. Without Tessmer, Simmons and Benjamin broke into Mrs. Crook's home, bound her hands, covered her eyes, and then drove her to a state park and threw her off a bridge. Although Simmons later pleaded innocence because of the evidence, leading up to the crime, Simmons had expressed to his two friends that he wanted to murder someone (Roper v. Simmons). He deliberately planned this murder for months and presented his plan to his two friends who later played a significant role in the ruling.…
- 996 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1968, Gein was sane enough to stand trial. The trial began on November 14, 1968, lasting one week. Gein was found guilty of first-degree murder, but because he was found to be legally insane, he spent the rest of his life in a mental…
- 920 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The following hearings will be taking place : Renee Smith pleaded guilty to 2nd Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety on 11/4/2014. Renee Smith will stand before Judge Rebecca F to be sentenced on 12/23/2014.…
- 187 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The criminal justice system has within it a set of rules, regulations and guidelines, known as criminal laws which are based on various sources, some dating back to England. Criminal law also has a purpose for which it was designed. Criminal laws have jurisdiction which keeps it structured and in order. Within criminal law are various offenses for which there must be standards of proof. Criminal law addresses liabilities as well, such as criminal liability and accomplice liability. In addition there are various types of offenses, one set of offenses known as inchoate offenses, which will be discussed and compared with other types of criminal offenses here.…
- 1230 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Has justice been served? In the murder case of Russell Douglas, I feel that justice was served. Yes, justice has prevailed. I do feel that Thomas should had perhaps gotten a few more years, as I feel that the murder would not had taken place if Thomas had not lured Douglas into the woods. And if the allegations the defendants Prosecuting Attorney stated was true of Douglas beating his wife and children. Measures could had been taken to protect Thomas and her children, ultimately keeping her with her children, free from both harm and prison. As there is the judicial system that is there to protect abused women and…
- 1497 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Strohmeyer's trial begins Monday, and he faces a possible death sentence for the May 25, 1997, slaying of the Los Angeles second-grader. Cash has admitted he saw Strohmeyer, also 19, with the girl in the bathroom stall where her body was eventually found, but did nothing to stop what was happening or notify security or police.…
- 869 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
1. What is the difference between retribution model of punishment and the utilitarian justification for punishment? The retributive justification for punishment focuses on what the offender deserves as a result of his or her criminal behavior and the utilitarian focus on the future criminal behavior of both the person being punished and other members of society.…
- 1280 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Little Louie is charged with conspiracy because he had talked planned with Billy Bad Boy and Vince Bagadonuts.…
- 308 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
). The sources of US Law are important because they secure our general wellbeing, and guarantee our rights as natives against misuse by other individuals, by associations, and by the administration itself. We have laws to accommodate our general wellbeing. These exist at the neighborhood, state and national levels, and incorporate things such as laws that originate from the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution, that ensure our fundamental opportunities like the right to speak freely, religion, and the press. Laws that shield us from segregation in light of our race, sex, age, or due to an incapacity. In the United States, the Constitution is a definitive wellspring of the law. Be that as it may, it was never intended to address each particular…
- 690 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This course consists of three (3) credit hours. This course will teach the student about the creation and application of substantive criminal law. This class will cover topics regarding the nature and origins of criminal law, substantive due process, elements of criminal liability, the doctrine of complicity, incomplete crimes, defenses of criminal liability, and the elements of crimes against persons, habitation, property, the public order, and morals.…
- 1273 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
We are taught that the courts and the Supreme Courts, in particular, are charged with interpreting the Constitution and the laws of the Unites States. We are further taught that the law enforcement should accept such interpertations uncritically and without hesitation. Theory and reality differ for at least four reasons, the Supreme Court sometimes makes decisions on excruciantingly detailed matters that have almost no appliciablility to most law enforcement officers most of the time. The…
- 401 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Civil and criminal law proceedings comprise the two polar opposites of the United States legal system. The least known of the two, civil law proceedings encompass cases brought by plaintiff(s) against another individual(s). The burden of proof is then on the plaintiff with the standard being preponderance of evidence and, unlike criminal cases, if the defendant loses the case they are made to reimburse the plaintiff as restitution. Examples of civil cases are divorce proceedings, property disputes and personal injury. In contrast, criminal law proceedings deal with criminal offense and their legal punishment. The standard of proof for criminal cases is beyond a reasonable doubt and the burden of proof falls on the prosecution to prove the defendant…
- 146 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
It is important that all relevant information be disclosed to the accused. Refusal to do so will always bring the administration of justice into dispute. There are circumstances though where that may not be possible. In the events where disclosing certain information could bring harm to the security and safety of persons certain information may be withheld. There are four considerations that must be made by the Crown counsel should the defence request information about witnesses: the first is to make sure that the accused will get fair trial; second is that witness are neither the property of the Crown or Defence; third, the witnesses right not to testify unless…
- 874 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays