Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Critic about dealth penalty in malaysia

Good Essays
1499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critic about dealth penalty in malaysia
Critic
In 1849, Cesar who is the King of Roman Republic argued that the death penalty is injustice itself and it is a futile exercise. Then, this causes Roman Republic acts as the first nations to abolish the Death Penalty in modern times. This is the movement based on the human rights. After that, Venezuela in 1863 and Portugal in 1867 also abolished the death penalty in their country. A new era of human rights and International Law sought first to set out the foundations of Human Rights (UDHR, 1948) to introduce moratorium of death penalty through all the countries after the second world war. In 1966 (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) and 1990 (Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights), they continue their work to invoke other countries to abolish the Death Penalty universally. More than two thirds of world's countries have abolished the death penalty such as European Union membership. It is clear that majority have supported a UN Resolution. However, there are still have some countries have not abolished the death penalty such as China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, United Kingdom and some states in the USA and especially in Texas, still regularly put people to death.
First and foremost, we can view the death penalty from the aspect of economic. Everyone is asking a question whether the death penalty should be abolished. If the death penalty abolished, it will replaced by life imprisonment and this will increase the burden of economic of a country. The government of that country needs to spend more budgets in this aspect. This will lead to the increasing of taxpayers and it is not fair for the citizens or taxpayers due to this replacement. However, we need to ask a question again whether the save of money is important than the life. As we know, we cannot compare everything with money in this world such as health, love, spirit and others. For example, we can buy the medicine but we cannot buy the health and we can buy a wife but we cannot buy a true love. Thus, money does not mean everything. A man is a precious created things, we cannot continue place the death penalty just because we worry about the burden of economic of a country. We should spend some of the budget in this aspect and we can ask the family of the accused to pay more so that it can be one of the solutions to cover the burden of the taxpayers.
Furthermore, there have some research points out that the death penalty system is much more expensive than sentencing inmates to life imprisonment. For example, California could save $1 billion over five years by replacing the death penalty with permanent or life imprisonment due to the constitution requires a complex and long judicial process for capital cases. Besides this, The Office of Legislative Research for the Connecticut General Assembly also concluded that:
“There are several problems involved in trying to determine the cost of a capital case. First, there is a wide variety of costs associated with capital cases. These include costs for prosecuting and defence attorneys, interpreters, expert witnesses, court reporters, psychiatrists, secretaries, and jury consultants. Another problem is the length and complexity of the process. Cases tend to last several years and can pass through three possible phases. The first phase includes state trial court (two trials - one to determine guilt, the other for sentence), state Supreme Court, and possible appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court. The second phase is the state habeas corpus (post-conviction process) and appeals. The final phase is federal habeas corpus, which includes appeals to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and to the U.S. Supreme Court...1”
Next, we need to view the death sentence from the aspect of deterring. We know that one of the principles of death penalty is deterring the offender and also prevent others from repeating the crimes. However, the death penalty does not deter crimes. In Malaysia, the Kelang Session Court stated that it does not seem to have any effect on the crime rate based on the statistics which compiled in particular court. For example, there has no effect on the number of cases of drug offences brought for the Kelang Session Court although the severe sentence provided for include the death penalty. Therefore, I think the education is more important than the severe sentence but I do not denied the importance of severe sentence too. We need to teach our next generation since they are young so that they would not commit the crime. We need to implant or instill the moral value to our next generation. If they have the spirit of the religion and morality such as justice, righteousness, kindness, uprightness and humanities, I sure they would not commit the crime easily. This is the more effective way to reduce the crime rates compare to death penalty or severe sentence such as whipping or long time imprisonment.
Third, the death penalty is irreversible. If a mistake is bound to be happened, and this means people being put to death for a crime they did not commit, it is so unfortunate incident that we do not hope to see it happens. We cannot take back a people’s life in such situation. It is unfair to the innocent person because they never commit the crime. However, they are being put by the death penalty due to the wrong judgments. This will be occurred if death penalty has not been abolished. Imagine what if that were you or someone you loved being put by the death penalty although you or you loved do not commit the crime. It is so cruel and terrible. For example, a Texas man who stayed in Cameron Todd Willingham was found innocent after his 2004 execution of death penalty. However, this could not cover back the life of him because the punishment is done. In addition, Justice Harry Blackmun claims that the application of the death penalty is so arbitrary because it violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against the unusual punishment. It is cruel and there is an irreconcilable conflict between two requirements in capital sentencing. Therefore, most of the countries in this world were making a decision to abolish the death penalty.
It seems like death penalty should be abolished based on the three points given above as we have discussed. Now, it is back to our country, should death sentence be abolished in Malaysia? I would like to point out my stand which is death penalty must not be abolished especially in Malaysia. Based on the first point which consider the aspect of economic, there have some research stated that the death penalty system is much more expensive than sentencing inmates to life imprisonment due to the maintenance of the apparatus and long judicial process. As we know, the humane' lethal injection which took 34 minutes and required two doses in the execution of death penalty is much more expensive compare with other apparatus. There have other methods of execution used around the world include hanging, shooting and beheading. Hanging which used by Malaysia is the cheapest in the maintenance among all the apparatus and materials. Thus, we do not need so worry about the burden of economic of our country.
Second, studies done across the world are usually tendency by the interest of a group. For an example, group agree with the death penalty will show the statistics about the crime rates have been reduced where the death penalty is provided for in a state but the group which against the death penalty will also conduct their study to show opposite phenomena. These reports are usually not included on other variables such as the increasing population. However, death penalty really functions in Malaysia. According to Kelang Session Court, there has much more small amount of drugs involved in cases compare to large amount of drugs involved in cases. Hence, it is a presumption that the death penalty which stated in Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 has at least deterring the person from trafficking in large amounts of drugs. This would help in limiting the amount of drugs in circulation. It may then reduce the crime rates.
In my conclusion, I think that the time has not come for death penalty in Malaysia to be abolished. Furthermore, we need to educate the public that why certain offences need carry the death penalty and some do not. This would help the government to face the dilemma or predicament which rose by the public. There is no doubt to show that nothing positive effects if death penalty provided for. On the other hand, there are also no negative effects in exercising death penalty in Malaysia. We need to understand this. Lastly, I would like to conclude that it does not jeopardy the criminal judicial system in our country if death penalty still provided for. Therefore, I am stand firmly that death sentence should not be abolished.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the death penalty is a form of revenge which is an outdated method for justice in our society today. Using this method of an eye for an eye type of punishment is the inhumanely killing of a person. As said by Ghandi, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" meaning revenge or retribution is not the answer you should seek when punishing someone. This form of punishment has been used since ancient times and is so severe that it can not be reversed. The permanence of this punishment is unsparing and does not give the person any chances to be rehabilitated or try to be integrated back into society. The very worst means of torture or disciplinary action is to take a person’s life. The whole purpose of our justice system is to impede criminals from committing crime by the means of punishment that…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has pros and cons. Some of the pros of the death penalty are that it frees more space for incoming prisoners, therefore we can pay less taxes. The amount of space taken from prisoners who have a life sentence take up to much space and the death penalty would prevent that from happening. The cost of the death penalty is dramatically lower then the cost of the sentence “Life Without Parole” JFA [Justice for All] estimates that life without parole cases will cost $1.2 million-$3.6 million more than equivalent death penalty cases. There is no question that the up front costs of the death penalty are significantly higher than for equivalent life without parole cases. There also appears to be no question that, over time, equivalent life without parole cases are much more expensive... than death penalty cases. Opponents ludicrously claim that the death penalty costs, over time, 3-10 times more than life without parole. The death penalty would possibly make people afraid to commit a felony because they might be punished with the ultimate punishment… Death.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is a waste of money, time and space. The death penalty simply confuses the community and blurs the line between right and wrong, since you are hypocritically punishing someone for killing another human, by in return killing them also. The death penalty isn’t decreasing the murders so why re-instate it? Imagine the affect on young children when they find out what happens to hazardous criminals, it would ruin the child’s innocence. They death penalty bring nothing but suffering to the family of the criminal, and a negative atmosphere throughout the community. If it were your child on death row wouldn’t you want them to have a second chance? Once again, I state with utmost important, the death penalty should remain as a figure of the past and we should remain civilised and keep our-self and community away from this inhumane act as long as…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    abolished or not. Many people think that the death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights, they also believe that it violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is also known to be a cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment to kill someone even though they have murdered or had help the killer commit the crime. Some people believe what is the point of the death penalty, they are already dead so how is it helping any for the victim.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty or in other words capital punishment is a form of execution used for a long time. It is a form of punishment that was and still is used by several countries for various types of crimes for hundreds of years. However the death penalty has become a very debatable and confronting issue for last decades due to the fact of people having different opinions on this issue. In some countries it is considered to be a part of the judicial system, while in other countries it is considered to be an act violating human rights. During the first decade of 21st century, about two thirds of world vide countries have abolished the capital punishment due to the fact it is a violation of moral codex and human rights. There are always pros and cons to every action humans are able to do, so it is with the issue of death penalty. Countries such as China, USA, Japan or India have still retained to the execution of criminals by death penalty. However there are many intergovernmental and human rights organization such as the European Union that understands the death penalty to be one of the most pressing human rights issues of all time. (Babcock S., 2007) People are questioning the courts if death penalty really deters the crime, or if it is just a need to satisfy society’s desire for revenge. We can find many arguments against it; however the answer to question of abolishing the death penalty by the entire world is unclear and in far future. China is the country known for using many forms of inhuman punishment methods. There can be find an evidence showing the China to be the country with the highest execution case rate. I could not believe these statements, so I decide to search this issue and…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty could be a cost effective way of getting rid of dangerous criminals. Maintaining each death row prisoner cost the taxpayers ninety thousand more per year than a prisoner in a general population. Getting rid of people on death row will save taxpayers a lot more money. It could be a cost effective way of getting rid of dangerous criminals and to keep the less violent criminals in for longer. Getting rid of people who are on a life sentence or on death row will save taxpayers a lot of money which could be spent on other things in…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty now viewed as so barbaric that the views around the world have shifted so much that the U.S continuous to be the only country in Western Democracy to carry it out (Manning & Rhoden-Trader, 2000). The U.S has now begun to recognize so many problems that the death penalty system has such as it being unequally applied to minorities time and time again. Furthermore, the cost of carrying out an execution is staggering compared to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Inmates that were sitting on death row have been and continue to be exonerated which means innocent people can be put to death. One other major problems with the death penalty and statistics have shown that it simple does not deter crime. For these reasons and more I believe we should abolish the death penalty and never look…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is something that has many countries in the world divided. In my opinion, I believe that the death penalty should be legal throughout the country. There are many reasons as to why the death penalty should be legalized in the country including retribution, deterrence, and morality. Also, because opposing arguments do not hold up, I will discredit the ideas that the death penalty is not constitutional, irreversible mistakes are made, and that race and income will face disproportionality.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty in Peru

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the other hand, death penalty has pros and some are these. It is allowable because the criminal did murder an innocent victim, and therefore should be killed. As consequence, death penalty is going to stop criminals from murdering. Let the convicted murderer work for the public good for the rest of his/her life. Many people will agree that death penalty is just and fair. Additionally, the death penalty can lower crime, and is not an evil punishment, it’s the person who committed such a crime who deserves the death penalty.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a government sanctioned way to legally kill someone as punishment for a crime they have done. The death penalty is meant to initiate criminals pay for their crimes, prevent any future crimes, and to show other criminals what will happen if they achieve a crime that will lead to the death penalty. Nevertheless, capital punishment is wrong for numerous reasons, but the utmost common reasons would be human rights, wrongful execution, and cost effective. These reasons should be taken seriously considering that it is another person’s life aside for what they have done. Whereas it can affect someone’s financial situation since they have paid for it with their own money.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Someones Life Story

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the death penalty isolate the murderers and criminals from the outside world and eliminate the danger that they have for society, there is still the high costs to execute someone ,and fairness on executed an innocent human…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is illegal in some countries and allowed in other countries in fact 72 death sentences were given out in the U.S. In the court death penalty is a sentence given to the suspect if the crime is decided to be fatal to society. In summary death penalty should be allowed because people will be treated not to do it, exterminates criminals and it will teach another citizen not to commit crimes.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty is the most inhuman and crucial punishment. Even though it is not applied in every state, the death penalty is a very strong debate and argument within our own government. There are people who support it and those who are against it. The death penalty is a punishment to those who due to their actions and circumstances commit crimes. All people are all equal under the eyes of the law and those people in the end are still humans no matter the crimes they have committed. The death penalty is looked as a violation to the eighth amendment. It is an invalid form of punishment. The risks of inaccurate judgment can change the live of a human within just a few seconds. Taking away another person’s life for committing a crime is like taken an easy way out. The U.S. government should stop using immediately death penalty as a way of punishment because it is unfair, unethical and crucial.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The death penalty remains as one of the controversial issues not only in the United States but in the whole world as well. The death penalty has articulated itself as a debate characterized by rhetoric of pro death penalty ideals and con death penalty assertions. It should be noted that the debate on death penalty is not new in the world considering that death penalty has been used as a method of punishing criminals since time immemorial, although it may have gained momentum in the 20th century with enactment of human rights charter. For example, records on death penalty shows that the first man to receive this capital punishment was Daniel Frank, in the 15th century. However, it is important to note that justification of death penalty varies from one society to the other and in contemporary world where everyone thinks the world is more liberalized than ever, death penalty is likely to receive support and criticism from different quarters in the society. Debate on death penalty is mainly constructed in realm of the causes and the effects it has on the society. Those in support of death penalty mainly considers the causes while those in opposed to death penalty mostly consider the effects it has on the society,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays