When critiquing a research paper, you are evaluating the research and the argument made by the author. To evaluate a research article, one will need to look at what the author is claiming, their research methods, and any problems there might be with the claims made. Are the references in the article reliable? What process did the researchers use? Do the researchers show bias with their findings? There are many questions to ask and many elements to look at when critiquing a research paper. This paper will critique two different research articles; one qualitative and one quantitative.…
for critiquing the article. You will be critiquing the content of the article. Do not critique the writing style or grammar…
Select the quantitative or qualitative critical appraisal form available on the McMaster university site: http://bit.ly/bc7hlm. Using the guidelines to help you, try to critique the article you chose in time out 4. Phase 2: appraising the quality of articles The term ‘assessing study quality’ is often used interchangeably with ‘assessing the internal validity’ – that is, the extent to which a study is free from methodological biases’ (Petticrew and Roberts 2006) or ‘the degree to which the results of a study are likely to approximate the “truth”’ (The Cochrane Collaboration 2009). Jadad (1998) suggested that the following points should be considered when assessing the quality of randomised controlled trials: 4Relevance of the research question. 4Internal validity of the trial – the degree to which the trial design, conduct, analysis and presentation minimise bias. 4External validity – the extent to which findings are generalisable. 4Appropriateness of the data analysis and presentation. 4Ethical implications. In the context of systematic reviews, quality refers to the methodological quality – the internal and external validity of quantitative studies.The criteria for qualitative studies are different. These studies are often judged on the basis of BOX…
OVERVIEW: This is Part 1 of a two-part assignment designed to guide you through the steps of critically reviewing a published, evidence-based, scholarly journal article. This is an activity in which students engage frequently across their college careers in the completion of a variety of assignments. The article you review will be selected from the classroom Resources folder.…
Yes.Qualitative research is to study a person’s behavior and lived experiences related to what is being studied in the research (Denzin and Lincoln, 2011). The key characteristics of qualitative study in this article included a small sample size, in-depth interview (semi-structured), researcher involving during interview, non comparisons and non numerical.…
Author, Harriet Davids, of “The Extended School Day” believes all elementary schools should adopt an extended school day policy. Davids main ideas focus on the safety of the children, whether it be in the care of a nanny or home alone, safety is the number one priority. Davids not only states that an extended school day will be beneficial to the parents and the students, but also the teachers and staff involved in the after school programs. In an affective essay there are seven essential elements that must be followed to skillfully create a forceful essay. Unfortunately, Davids lacks many of these elements in the entitled essay, “The Extended School Day”.…
Critiquing a study involves the application of some basic guidelines to assist in finding answers for some questions. They are: 1) what are the research problem significant? 2) What are the major strengths and weakness of the study? 3) Does the researcher use sound methodology? 4) Was the study results valid? 5) Is there any study replicated and what is the results comparison? Are there any implications to practical applications? (Burns & Groves, 2006). By answering these questions one can find the strengths, weakness, and validity, reliability and implications of the study to the practice.…
I found after reading my four articles, the critiquing using the Johns Hopkins form was pretty difficult. To me the forms are confusing because I don’t have a lot of experience using them or doing much research. All four articles that I chose to use had adequate information to help me come to a conclusion for the…
There are many different models that can be used to critique and appraise research (Glasper & Rees, 2013). Glasper & Rees (2013) state some of the best research critical appraisal tools include the Crombie, CASP, and Parahoo as well as the Rees model of critiquing qualitative and quantitative studies. The paper ‘Two dead frankfurts and a blob of sauce’: The serendipity of receiving nutrition and hydration in Australian residential aged care is a qualitative study which was published in Australia: Wagga Wagga, NSW. The authors, Maree Anne Bernoth, Elaine Dietsch and Carmel Davies all have qualifications including Ph.D, Registered nurses, RM, and MThH and thus have expertise in the field and can also supply sufficient…
In this course the three poems that I related to the most was the ballad of a chocolate Mabbie by Gwendolyn Brooks (130) , Bonny Barbara Allen by Anonymous (132), and The Sonnet 116 by William Shakespeare (131). One of the main reason’s I found these poems the most interesting was because I was able to understand the writer and their point of view of the message on love that they were trying to share. The most easiest to analyze was the story of Mabbie, a poor girl who has a crush on a boy who barely notices who she is. I guess the main reason why it was the easiest was because I could relate to Mabbie, and thought that perhaps her name stood for something other than a true name of a little girl, perhaps Mabbie is whom ever or whatever you may want it to be. Truly the ballad is about desiring someone that you cannot have at this moment. The hardest for me to decipher was Sonnet 116 by William Shakespeare, one of the main reasons this was not easy for me is because I have never been good at Sonnets in addition, William uses metaphors to deliver his message. In order to accuratly analyze his poems knowledge must be obtained about his era and how they communicated to one another and then try and decipher the poem. Regardless of the challenges faced while analyzing the poems I believe I successfully completed the task.…
In a study by Scott, Hofmeister, Rogness, & Rogers (2010) it was noted that other industries have recognized the impact of shift work, lack of sleep, and fatigue on work performance and a related increase in risk for errors and injuries. In response to the recognition of theses hazards other industries have implemented programs to decrease the incidence of errors and injuries related to fatigue. The study noted that although nursing is a profession…
The thing I enjoyed most about this assignment was the actual reading of the petition. I had never known this existed, and love history!…
The researchers in this experiment aimed to “Investigate the quantitative differentiation of pulmonary dendritic cells in smoker with or without chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) to explore the possible role of dendritic cells in smokers suffering COPD” (Yan-wei, Yong-jiang, & Xian-sheng, 2010). Dendritic cells (DCs) are inflammatory cells that are considered to be the promoter of immune responses; knowing this the researchers hypothesized that DCs may play an important role in the development of the disease. Subjects were broken into three groups based on an illness gradient: (control group, smokers without airflow obstruction, and COPD group as determined by the Chinese Society of Respiratory Disease). Samples of alveolar tissue were taken from these three groups and studied using immunohistochemical staining and immunofluorescence confocal laser scanning. The results from the experiment are portrayed using a one-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s r coefficient, graphs, and scatter plots. The conclusion of the data showed that “The quantity of the DCs significantly increased in smokers with COPD compared with non-smokers or smokers without COPD” (Yan-wei et al., 2010).…
CASP was originated in Oxford, which produces various appraisal tools for different methodologies; such as, RCT, systematic reviews and so forth (CASP, 2013). Therefore, CASP RCT checklists provide a total of eleven questions, which guides an individual to determine the quality and validity of the research study (Cleyle and Glynn, 2006). These eleven questions are then divided into three sections; which includes (A) “Are the results of the trial valid?”, (B) “What are the results?”, (C) “Will the results help locally?” (CASP, 2013). This checklist can be accessed and downloaded on the internet through the CASP website (http://media.wix.com/ugd/dded87_40b9ff0bf53840478331915a8ed8b2fb.pdf).…
To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, respond to each of the questions listed under the headings below. Do not answer the questions with a yes or no; rather, provide a rationale or include examples or content from the study to address the questions.…