Critical Incident Analysis Using Bortons Framework
Nursing & Midwifery
Feedback on Coursework – First Submission
PART A: TO BE COMPLETED BY STUDENT AND SUBMITTED AS PAGE 1 OF ASSIGNMENT
Module Title: | | Module Code: | | Level | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Student Name: | | Student Number: | | Pathway e.g. Degree/Diploma: | | | | Submission Date: | | Extension Granted: YES NO | Late Submission Date: | Notified in advance to Module Coordinator:YES NO | Extenuating Circumstances: YES NO | Declaration of Originality attached YES NO |
PART B: FIRST MARKER COMMENTS – to identify strength, weakness and specific action required.Name 1st Marker ______________________________________ Date ____________________ | MARK | MINUS DEDUCTION Deduction to be made to MARK for unauthorised late submission. | | = | (5% per day for each working day up to a maximum of 5 days, after which a mark of 0% shall be awarded) | RE-READ COMMENTSName 2nd Marker ______________________________________ Date ____________________ | MARK | MINUS DEDUCTION Deduction to be made to MARK for unauthorised late submission. | | AGREED = MARK = | ( 5% per day for each working day up to a maximum of 5 days, after which a mark of 0% shall be awarded) | EXTERNAL EXAMINER COMMENTS | Name External Examiner: | | Date: | FINAL AWARDED MARK | |
STUDENT NUMBER – 40077813
MODULE CODE – MID3081
ACADEMIC LEVEL 3
PATHWAY – BSC IN MIDWIFERY STUDIES
TITLE – CRITICAL INCIDENT ANALYSIS
COURSE DIRECTOR – SHIRLEY STRONG
SUBMISSION DATE – 31ST MAY 2012
WORD COUNT - 2740
Critical Incident Analysis
Reflection is more than a simple thinking exercise, it is used to help professionals critically analyse an experience, learn from it, develop their skills based on
Feedback on Coursework – First Submission
PART A: TO BE COMPLETED BY STUDENT AND SUBMITTED AS PAGE 1 OF ASSIGNMENT
Module Title: | | Module Code: | | Level | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Student Name: | | Student Number: | | Pathway e.g. Degree/Diploma: | | | | Submission Date: | | Extension Granted: YES NO | Late Submission Date: | Notified in advance to Module Coordinator:YES NO | Extenuating Circumstances: YES NO | Declaration of Originality attached YES NO |
PART B: FIRST MARKER COMMENTS – to identify strength, weakness and specific action required.Name 1st Marker ______________________________________ Date ____________________ | MARK | MINUS DEDUCTION Deduction to be made to MARK for unauthorised late submission. | | = | (5% per day for each working day up to a maximum of 5 days, after which a mark of 0% shall be awarded) | RE-READ COMMENTSName 2nd Marker ______________________________________ Date ____________________ | MARK | MINUS DEDUCTION Deduction to be made to MARK for unauthorised late submission. | | AGREED = MARK = | ( 5% per day for each working day up to a maximum of 5 days, after which a mark of 0% shall be awarded) | EXTERNAL EXAMINER COMMENTS | Name External Examiner: | | Date: | FINAL AWARDED MARK | |
STUDENT NUMBER – 40077813
MODULE CODE – MID3081
ACADEMIC LEVEL 3
PATHWAY – BSC IN MIDWIFERY STUDIES
TITLE – CRITICAL INCIDENT ANALYSIS
COURSE DIRECTOR – SHIRLEY STRONG
SUBMISSION DATE – 31ST MAY 2012
WORD COUNT - 2740
Critical Incident Analysis
Reflection is more than a simple thinking exercise, it is used to help professionals critically analyse an experience, learn from it, develop their skills based on
References: Baird, K (2007) Exploring autonomy in education: preparing student midwives. British Journal of Midwifery. 15(7):400-405. Birthplace in England Collaborative Group (2011). The Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study: perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth in “low risk” women. British Midwifery Journal;343:d7400. Borton. (1970) Reach, Touch and Teach. London:Hutchinson. Bulman (2008) An introduction to reflection C. Bulman, S. Schutz (Eds.), Reflective Practice in Nursing (4th ed.), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (2008) De Jonge, A De Jonge, A. Teunissen, DA. Van Diem, MT. Scheepers, PL. and Lagro-Janssen, AL. (2008) ‘Women’s positions during the second stage of labour: views of primary care midwives’. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 63: 347–356. Gupta, JK. Hofmeyr, GJ. Smyth, RMD. (2009) ‘Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia’. Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews:4. John Wiley and Sons. Hodnett, ED. Gates, S. Hofmeyr, GJ. Sakala, C. Weston, J. (2011)’ Continuous support for women during childbirth’.Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews:2. John Wiley and Sons. Jasper, M. (2003) Beginning Reflective Practice (Foundations in Nursing and Health Care). Cheltenham: Nelson Thomas Ltd Johnson R, Taylor W (2011) Principles in Intrapartum Skills: first stage issues Lawrence, A. Hofmeyr, GJ. Dowswell, T. Styles C (2009) ‘Maternal positions and mobility during the first stage of labour’.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews:4. John Wiley and Sons. Micquelutti, MA. Cecatti, JG. Mekuch, MY (2007) ‘Upright position during the first stage of labour a randomised control trial’.ActaObstetriciaetGynecologicaScandinavica. 86(5):553-558. National Childbirth Trust (NCT) (2003) Creating a Better Birth Environment: An Audit Toolkit.National Childbirth Trust,London. Priddis, H. Dahlen, H. Schmied, V (2011) ‘What are the facilitators, inhibitors, and implications of birth positioning? A review of the literature’.Women and Birth. Royal College of Midwives (RCM) Positions for labour and birth (2008). Midwifery Preactice Guide Russell, KE (2007) Mad, bad or different? Midwives and normal birth in obstetric led units Walton, C. Ylannousiz, K. Gatsby, H (2005) Promoting midwifery-led care within an obstetric-led unit. British Journal of Midwifery. 13(12):750-755. Walsh, D (2000) Essential Midwifery Practice: intrapartum care. Blackwell Publishing. London.