Preview

critical response

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
critical response
Critical Response Essay
Fred’s Dilemma

1. - If Fred were a Utilitarian, what would he do?

Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory where right and wrong depends on the consequences of one’s actions for everyone who might be affected by them. In other words, utilitarian individuals are trying to bring the best system to the society than any other system. Sometimes utilitarianism is summarized as "the maximum well-being for the maximum number". We know that life is full with situations that are difficult to solve without damage to anyone and it is the case of Fred. As we read, Fred is a worker of Greyarea Inc., a company that produces cigarettes. For the protection of the company, Fred has signed a confidentiality agreement that unable him to leak out any kind of information to the public that could affect the company’s benefits. Greyarea Inc. could sue Fred if he decides to tell the public that the cigarettes are harmful as he found in his research. If Fred decides to tell the truth about the cigarettes real effects, it does not make sense that he would be right or wrong. But focusing in that Fred is utilitarian, he would want to tell the public the real consequences of Greyarea Inc. cigarettes and what could happen if they continue buying those cigarettes. But he could not ignore that his decision could affect his own economic stability and also his family and his career. As I mentioned before, Fred’s moral beliefs would tell him that he best state of things is that in which the sum of what is valuable is as high as possible and so much more important than himself and the consequences of them.

2. - If Fred were a Deontologist (Kant), what would he do?

Deontologist refers to an ordered set of duties and moral obligations of the professionals of a certain subject. People have an obligation and are forced to their duty. Also, people need to act from their duty if they want to act morally in the right way. Kant argued that we do not need

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    UNV 100

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    - Susie is aware that the company is being sold. Her friend keeps asking if the rumors are true. An utilitarian generally would make the decision not to confide in her friend as it may have a negative impact for more than just her friend.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psci 231 Midterm Review

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Section One: 1. What is, “Utilitarianism” and why is it important to the study of businessgovernment relations? Utilitarianism is a usually described as the greatest happiness for the greatest number. It reflects the action that produces the most happiness for people; meaning that an action is good if it produces a higher ultility of happiness. The thoery treats all members of a society equally, balances the inequalities in wealth between rich and poor people and justifies human acts. For example, consider a single mother stealing baby formlua. In this case, the mother is not harming anyone else and her baby is getting the food it needs. The happiness of the mother is justified because her actions did not harm anyone, and her baby having enough food increases her ulitily. John S. Mill would focus on the things that give people happiness rather than judeging actions based on religion and culture. Critisicsms of utilitariansim can also be made. It is understood that utilitarianism measures the total hapiness of people. However, it is not not right to assume that two people will have the same level of utility over something. An example of this can be depicted in the following scenario. Person A loves horses and buys a new sadle which gives her a total util of 50. Person B rather, is interested in sports car. Person B is uninterested in the saddle and would most likely produce a util of about 10. Therefore it is unpossible to say that levels of utility are compareable amongst people. Another criticsm of utilitarianism is that it fails to promote individual rights. Say that a mother likes hitting her child, and while doing so, her level of utility increases. Utilitarianism would support the mother and justify her acts because she is obtaining an increasing amont of utility. However, hitting your child repetively is morally and ethically wrong. But, in this case, according to utilitarianism, the utility gain of the mother is greater than the utility cost endured by the…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week 1

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Deontological ethical theory places more weight on the adherence to obligations and duties when analyzing an ethical dilemma. This emphasis is placed on the action…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontology is a moral theory that guides and assesses the choices of what we should do where virtue theory guides and assess what kind of person we should be. In deontology right is more important than good. If the act is not deemed to be in the right no matter how much good it does the action would not be the correct moral action to take.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the four deontological systems that we have discussed, I would like to share my thoughts about the Kantian Deontological System. Kantian Ethics is formulated by Immanuel Kant in which he discussed that the nature of duty is based on human reason. For him, human reason, not human nature, can determine what is right and wrong. He also stressed that human desires are not the right measurement for ethics. In addition, Kantian Ethics is known for its two kinds of command or imperative: the hypothetical and categorical imperative. According to Immanuel Kant, hypothetical imperative has conditions and has no value. We do a certain action or decision because we are waiting for something in return or because we are afraid of punishment. On the other…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontology is an ethical theory that only focuses on the act itself, not on the actions the act itself will bring about. Deontologists do acknowledge that actions bring on certain reactions but do not believe the reaction should be taken into consideration when determining if an act was moral or not. “Deontology, taken in its largest sense, is meant that branch of art and science which has for its object the doing on each occasion what is right and proper to be done “(Louden, 1996). Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative takes this and breaks it down into rules and with these rules assumes that all people are moral. These rules have no “but” to them, they are straightforward, basically if you do this, you are moral or immoral. For example, if you kill someone, no matter if it is in self-defense or cold blooded then the person is considered immoral. This theory is not complicated and very to the point, it is easy to follow and has many supporters.…

    • 756 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical System Table

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    | Regardless of consequences, certain moral principles are binding, focusing on duty rather than results or moral obligation over what the individual would prefer to do (Treviño & Nelson, 2007, Ch. 4).In ethics, deontological ethics, or deontology (Greek: deon meaning obligation or duty), is a theory holding that decisions should be made solely or primarily by considering one's duties and the rights of others. Some systems are based on biblical or tenets from sacred.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word deontology means the science of duty. Immanuel Kant, the philosopher most associated with deontology, defined a person as a reasonable, uncontrolled being who has the capacity to recognize moral laws and the power to decide to act morally or immorally, according to his/her duty (1785/2012). A person’s decisions are made by respecting others; this is our duty as humans. Kant further expanded on duty by distinguishing two types, hypothetical and categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives are duties that are pure, outright and absolute. There are two questions Kant formulated in relation to categorical imperatives that can be asked when deciding if an action is right or wrong. Can this action be applied to every circumstance as universal law? Is the action being taken a means to an end? If the answer to the first is yes and the second no, then according to Kant, the action is morally right…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critical Response Essay

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ray Bradbury’s “The Sound of Thunder” and Gloria Skurzynski’s “Nethergrave” are both good science fiction stories. These stories are both about scientific technology changing the life of a certain person, although there are a few different themes in these stories. In, “The Sound of Thunder,” Eckells has a rude awakening when he realizes that he will be facing harsh consequences due to the fact that he didn’t obey the few rules that were given at the beginning of his journey. In “Nethergrave,” Jeremy chooses to revolve his life around the virtual world, rather than the real world where he is constantly bullied and usually feeling embarrassed, abandoned and sometimes hurt. However, both of these characters are rather similar, as they are both being selfish in an unselfish way without realizing that they are in fact being selfish. Both of these stories revolve around the effect certain choices have on others’ future and even your own future.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These entirely two different actions would definitely put the strict deontologist at odds with Immanuel Kant’s philosophy. Not so much in doing our duty, as using the philosophy to determine WHAT is our duty. If I truly am the computer programmer in this scenario, I would definitely…

    • 364 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontologists are concerned with the concept of duty. This highlights that people are concerned with fulfilling what they…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stakeholder, pleasure v. pain, numerical model of Utilitarianism - Utilitarian analysis as per required model (See required Utilitarian model below)…

    • 9503 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical Disposition

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In my opinion critical disposition is to look at something from more than one angle. Be open to new idea’s and not accept the first theory or concept that you are told. Create your own way of thinking and not be the type to follow a crowd.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I found an old movie my dad directed! It’s Hamlet from ten years ago. My dad’s a Shakespearean nut, so I’m pretty sure he enjoyed doing this. It very different from what you might expect a movie of a centuries-old Shakespearean play. My father interpreted it in a more recent setting.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays