Preview

Critical Response paper 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
810 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critical Response paper 1
Liberalism vs. Socialism

When looking into different political theories there are many different views and even more political opinions on what is best for any one nation and their citizens. In order to fully understand any component of government we must understand its underlying political ideologies and the beliefs behind its policies and views. Liberalism, conservatism, socialism, fascism, feminism, and environmentalism are well known political ideologies. Each ideology has drastic differences of views relating to equality, power, freedom, and justice. Let’s shift the focus by showing just how drastic these differences and concepts can be between the ideologies by looking at liberalism and socialism in terms of government and political systems.
In order to understand the workings of a liberalist government we must understand their beliefs. Liberalism supports the idea of individualism over society in that people have the right to make choices for themselves, not society. Liberals believe in equality meaning that no person is morally or politically superior to another. They also believe that people as individuals are capable of thinking logically and rationally in areas of political science and economics, allowing the replacement of old, traditional views by newer and more appropriate views that fit today’s modern way of living. Liberalism supports the free market concept of creating wealth to whoever strives for it rather than placing regulations and limitations on occupations people can hold which no doubt limits their economic a social growth. These basic characteristics of liberalism have led liberals to argue in favor of a limited government, which draws its power from the people. An example of a liberalist government would be during the 1600, particularly the Glorious Revolution of 1688 in Britain. During this time the liberal views regarding freedom of the press and freedom of speech, were being justified in a government setting and the ideas of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Uk Coalition Gov

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Liberal Democrats believe in government action to achieve equality of opportunity for everyone. The government must protect civil liberties, human rights and individual rights. The government is needed only to solve problems, and keep social justice, in order for a strong community with strong values. Whereas Conservatives believe in individual liberty, free markets, and traditional values connected to marriage, morality and family. They believe the role of the government is the provide people the freedom to achieve their potential.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberal- Someone who believes in government. The whole Democratic Party used to be considered Liberal. Someone who believes government is a useful tool in solving social and economic problems. Government should be involved in regulating the economy. They believe that government is good for those who fall through the cracks. Liberals are also known as progressives.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Government Final Notes

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages

    - Liberals: one who favors governmental involvement in the economy and in the provision of social services and who takes an activist role in protecting the rights of women, the elderly, minorities, and the environment.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal democrats were formed in 1988 from The Social Democrat party, set up by four ex labour members. Currently the liberal democrats have formed a coalition government with the Conservatives. Classical liberals traditionally believe in negative liberty when it comes to state power (The idea that the state should have as little intervention as possible, socially and economically to enhance the freedom and innovation of the individual, therefore not infringing basic, natural rights). Classical Liberals prefer to keep the state to a minimum however with enough framework to provide basic laws prohibiting other regarding actions and to regulate government power. These views where portrayed by many liberal philosophers such as Adam Smith, in regards to economic management; he believed that free trade and free markets where fundamental to successful economic growth, as individuals, consumers and business would create competition and feel confident within the economy. However more modern liberals believe in a form of positive liberty (More state intervention for progression by providing individuals with the tools to create a basic standard of living to develop there social and economic lives, with systems such as welfare) TH green believed there was a need to embrace positive liberty as he stated that individual liberty was only achievable under favourable social and economic circumstances (Creating the welfare system). However today’s contemporary liberal democrats have a combined belief of both positive and negative liberty. There is potential to suggest that there is a contradiction within the lib dems with regards to their position on the state.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberals, no matter classical or modern, believe in small state. As Thomas Paine put it: "Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil". This concept links nicely with the idea of democracy, which literally means "rule by people". Liberals have defended democracy on the grounds that people must have a way of protecting themselves against the government and its actions. This type of democracy is also referred to as protective democracy. Moreover, democracy opens an ability for people to choose. In a pure democracy, for instance, people would vote on every occasion and policy, hence the core liberal idea of individualism would flourish in its fullest. However, in modern society it is practically impossible to have pure democracy, so we have to resort to participatory democracy. This still support the idea of individualism, as each vote counts towards the end result.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberals vs conservatives

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Liberals and Conservatives have very different approaches to analyzing and forming understandings of how the market and government should operate within a society. While they both defend the capitalist business system they have varying levels of faith in the ability of these institutions ability to deliver rising social welfare in general.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of Liberalism “defined themselves in opposition to conservatives on one end of the political spectrum and revolutionaries on the other” (page 680). It supported freedom of religion, movement, conscience, assembly, and the press. In ensured equality for every man before law and God. In person has an equal opportunities for success or failure. Even though Liberalism was not a political movement, followers still believed that a good government had a balance of power between branches, property restrictions for representative government, and representatives were educated and successful.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Response Paper 2

    • 815 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Satlow’s argument that, “the Rabbis creatively rework or even subvert biblical ideal” (Satlow, “Creating Judaism,” 141), is one that I unquestionably agree with. By that statement, I believe he means that the Rabbis have made changes to, and even undermined the power and authority of, the biblical texts and the ideas they present. Based on past rabbinic literature readings that I have done, I would have to say that yes, I do agree with Satlow’s statement. That’s because there are many instances throughout the readings where the Rabbis seem to be challenging or not being completely accepting of what the bible says. Their interpretations vary, and they don’t accept the literal meaning of things, for example the “eye for an eye” case or even the Cain and Abel story. Not everyone accepts the statements in the Bible as they are told, and instead they adjust and modify them to better suit more contemporary times, whether it be modernizing laws or molding a story to make it more appealing and comprehensible.…

    • 815 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Classical liberalism is much like individualism. Classical liberalist believes that the government should have a limit and that individual liberty it what matters most. Individual liberty including freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and free markets are all good examples of what classical liberalism would consist of. Classical liberals do not like for the government to interfere with their personal lives. They stress instead reliance on private initiatives or the free market to determine the best outcomes. (p. 3) Classical liberals are individuals who like to put themselves before anything or anyone. Therefore, when I think classical liberalism, I think about a saying my sister always say “let me do me while you do you”. Classical liberals do not trust the government 100%, but they respect the government.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical liberals believe in negative freedom. This is the simple belief in an absence of external constraints on the individual and that they should be left alone to make their own choices. In this way classical liberals were heavily influenced by the natural rights theories of John Locke and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson claimed that we were born with certain “inalienable” rights and therefore no individual or government had the right to constrict them or take them away. Freedom from constraints is therefor an essential condition for exercising these rights. In practice this has meant that classical liberals have advocated a minimal state, what John Locke referred to as the ‘night watchman state’. The states activities should, in his eyes, be limited to the enforcement of contracts, maintaining order and protection from foreign threats to prevent the state from infringing on individual liberties as much as possible. On the other hand, modern liberals have advocated a more positive interpretation of freedom. Positive freedom can be defined as the ability to achieve true self-mastery and self-realisation in order to fulfil our individual potential. Modern liberals such as TH Green criticised negative freedom on the grounds that it failed to address the social and economic factors that can prevent individuals from achieving their full potential. Negative freedom was inadequate because it failed to remove these barriers to true self-mastery such as social disadvantage and inequality. Modern liberals have therefore proposed an enabling state. Rather than a ‘necessary evil’ as classical liberals believe, the state can be a force for good by protecting individuals against social and…

    • 1082 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    critical response

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory where right and wrong depends on the consequences of one’s actions for everyone who might be affected by them. In other words, utilitarian individuals are trying to bring the best system to the society than any other system. Sometimes utilitarianism is summarized as "the maximum well-being for the maximum number". We know that life is full with situations that are difficult to solve without damage to anyone and it is the case of Fred. As we read, Fred is a worker of Greyarea Inc., a company that produces cigarettes. For the protection of the company, Fred has signed a confidentiality agreement that unable him to leak out any kind of information to the public that could affect the company’s benefits. Greyarea Inc. could sue Fred if he decides to tell the public that the cigarettes are harmful as he found in his research.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At this time Liberal meant supporting freer trade (still almost a hundred years until actual free trade) and less government interference in the economy. This made the liberal party very popular during prosperous times because when businesses are booming, the less government management, the longer…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critical Response

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Everyday millions of children around the world fight for survival due to starvation, lack of shelter, and proper healthcare. World poverty increases significantly daily, and innocent children lives are being affected and destroyed. The fact that the child cannot address their world poverty issue hands on, should encourage people to give back to communities that are less fortunate. In “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” Peter Singers argues, that people main priorities are luxury items instead of supporting charitable agencies that are fighting against world poverty. Many individuals follow the saying “Keeping up with the Joneses” . Which means they try to live a lavish lifestyle, but really forget about the bigger picture, and that’s helping children who struggles to get a meal daily. Singer is right we should help support charitable agencies, but in order for that to happen people should be more open-minded about donating, and put away their fancy lifestyle and luxury items.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    What Is Liberalism?

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As the non-committal dictionary.com definition above suggests, the term “liberalism” is an elusive term to define. Whose faces are attached to the term? John F. Kennedy? Franklin D. Roosevelt? Barrack H. Obama? Does it evoke thoughts of the New Deal, Civil Rights, and Environmentalism? Or is it to be associated with James and John Stuart Mill, David Ricardo, Jeremy Bentham, and laissez-faire style economic policies? Without clarification, making reference to liberalism can be misleading. In this examination of the term, an attempt will be made at shedding some light on the origins of and the different meanings of the term liberalism.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Emerson (1920), Liberal is that mind or attitude which wills to understand and respect other people`s behavior, opinions it implies vigorous convictions, tolerance for the opinions of others and a persistent desire for sound progress, Democracy is Rule by the people, especially as a form of government; either directly, as in Ancient Greece, or through elected representatives as in many modern societies (representative democracy). François (1998). Therefore Liberal Democracy refers to a broad array of related ideas and theories of government that consider individual liberty to be the most important political goal. Partridge, 1866). A political party According to Schlesinger (1992) is a group organized to gain control of government in the name of the group by winning election to public office. The Structural functionalist Approach is an approach that studies, analyses and views structures and systems in any social setting with regards to the role or functions they play in the development of any society. A political party being a structure in a political system has a vital role or function it plays in society.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays