Critically Discuss the Various Existing Models Linking Organizational/ Business Strategy with Hrm Strategy
In today’s rapidly changing globalised business environment, human capital has become one of the keys to competitive advantage. Consequently, any good business strategy must fully utilise the inimitable assets of people through their knowledge, skills and abilities. This highlights the need for strategic human resource management (SHRM). The key assumption of SHRM is that organisational performance is affected by employees through a set of human resource (HR) practices (Pan et al 2006).
A review of the literature linking HR practices to business strategy shows two conflicting perspectives in SHRM. The universalistic perspective suggests that there is a universal set of best practices that any business can adopt to improve organisational performance. Conversely, the contingency perspective suggests that business performance will improve when there is consistency or fit between business strategy and HR policies. This essay will discuss the theory and models behind each perspective and provide a critique on each of the opposing views.
Universalistic perspective
This approach maintains that all firms will see performance gains by identifying and implementing best practice irrespective of the product market situation, industry or location of the firm. Performance gains include improvements in employee behaviours and attitudes, reduced staff turnover, increased productivity, quality and customer service and of course increased profitability. This requires support from top-level managers to adopt these key HR practices, research the latest trends of best practice and reward correct implementation of these practices.
Redman (2006) suggests that making changes to individual practices will have a very limited effect whereas making changes together will have a more powerful effect. This leads onto the concept of looking for a ‘bundle’ of practices which need to be combined together (Huselid 1995). Although many researchers agree with the concept of bundling practices
A review of the literature linking HR practices to business strategy shows two conflicting perspectives in SHRM. The universalistic perspective suggests that there is a universal set of best practices that any business can adopt to improve organisational performance. Conversely, the contingency perspective suggests that business performance will improve when there is consistency or fit between business strategy and HR policies. This essay will discuss the theory and models behind each perspective and provide a critique on each of the opposing views.
Universalistic perspective
This approach maintains that all firms will see performance gains by identifying and implementing best practice irrespective of the product market situation, industry or location of the firm. Performance gains include improvements in employee behaviours and attitudes, reduced staff turnover, increased productivity, quality and customer service and of course increased profitability. This requires support from top-level managers to adopt these key HR practices, research the latest trends of best practice and reward correct implementation of these practices.
Redman (2006) suggests that making changes to individual practices will have a very limited effect whereas making changes together will have a more powerful effect. This leads onto the concept of looking for a ‘bundle’ of practices which need to be combined together (Huselid 1995). Although many researchers agree with the concept of bundling practices
References: Baron, J. and Kreps, D. (1999). Consistent human resource practices. California Management Review, 41:3, 29-53. Boxall, P. and Purcell, J. (2003) Strategy and Human Resource Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan Huselid, M Legge, K. (2005) Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities. London: Palgrave Macmillan John Purcell (1999) MacDuffie, J.P. (1995). Human Resource bundles and manufacturing performance: organisational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48: 197-221. Marchington, M Marchington L, Earnshaw J., Torrington D., and Ritchie E. (2004) ‘The local education authority’s role in operating teacher capability procedures’. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 32(1): 25 – 44 Miles, R Pan, T.J., Nickson D. and Baum T. (2006) Relationship between strategic HRM and competitive advantage in the hotel industry – a case study of the budget hotel sector. University of Strathclyde, The Scottish Hotel School. Pfeffer, J. (1994) Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of the Workforce. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Pfeffer, J Porter, M (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New York. Redman, T Schuler, R.S. and Jackson, S.E. (1987). Linking competitive strategies and human resource management practices. Academy of Management Executive, 1:3. 207-219. Wright, P