Preview

Critically Discuss Whether (and How) Organisational Structure Impacts on Organisational Learning and the Learning Organisation.

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2281 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critically Discuss Whether (and How) Organisational Structure Impacts on Organisational Learning and the Learning Organisation.
Organisational Analysis
Critically discuss whether (and how) organisational structure impacts on organisational learning and the learning organisation.

Introduction Within this essay we will look at the structure perspective in relation to organisational learning and the learning organisation. Looking at key theories for both we will consider whether a truly structured company has the ability to learn from the environment and other organisations and has the capacity to become a learning organisation itself. We will specifically look at the classical management theories especially Taylor’s principle of scientific management, as well as taking into account Weber’s ideal bureaucracy. As well as this we will look at both single and double loop learning as well as the differences and the possible transition into a learning organisation.

Organisational Structure Structure is more prominent in western society and in predominantly based up on few key theories. Looking into the structure of an organisation it allows evaluation of whether structure helps or hinders learning within an organisation or a learning organisation. Early perspectives such as Taylor’s scientific management (1911) and Weber idea of bureaucracy (1947) sought universalistic principles of structure, planning and control. Classical management theorists such as Henri Fayol and F.W. Mooney were concerned with the problems of practical management, drawing on military and engineering principles, creating a pattern precisely defined jobs and organised in a hierarchal manner. (Morgan 2006) Taylor and Weber focussed on the key principles of classical management theory such as unity of command, scalar chain and division of work. Taylor furthered his work to advocate five simple principles of scientific management. Shifting all responsibility of the organisation of work for the worker to the management, using scientific methods to improve efficiency, selecting the



Bibliography: * Miles, R & Snow, C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. McGraw – Hill. * Morgan, G. (1998). Images of organization. Sage Publications. * Ritzer, G. (2007) The McDonaldization of Society (5th ed.). London: Pine Forge Press * Senge, P * State, R. (1989). Organizational learning: The Key to Management Innovation. Sloan Management Review. * Taylor, F. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harpers & Brothers.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    The classical theory is the earliest form of management that perceived that a set of universal principles would apply to all the organizations in all situations to achieve efficiency and organization's goals. Scientific management and bureaucratic theory were one of the several components of the classical school of organization. Important pioneers among them are Frederick Taylor and Max Weber. The classical theories have been contested of little relevance to work and organization today simply because today’s organizations have moved from industrial revolution to the information age due to the fast-paced change in technology (Toffler, 1984). Although bureaucracy has been synonymous to red tape and has negatives effects such as “rigidity, alienation and low commitment” (Adler, 1999, p.37) and dehumanizing people (Grey, 2009), the characteristics of bureaucracy such as specialization, hierarchy of authority, system of rules and impersonality (Stewart, 1986) as well as evidence of ongoing existence of this management method, bureaucracy is proved to remain noteworthy. This essay will examine the situation presented in organization today, and determine whether bureaucracy and scientific management can be considered as old fashioned, out of date and of little relevance to work and organization today.…

    • 2652 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organisational Analysis

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages

    According to Drummond (2000) mechanical imagery depicts organisations as static machine-like entities operating in a steady and predictable manner. Likewise, the metaphor of bureaucracy suggests that people in organisations are bounded by rules, job descriptions and organisation charts. It is important to note that Taylor’s philosophy is founded upon mechanical imagery. The key concepts in the structural perspective are based on Taylor’s principles of scientific management and Weber’s ideal bureaucracy. Taylor (1911) formalised the principles of scientific management into four objectives which are division of labour, one best way, scientific selection and training and monitor performance. In Taylor’s view, organisations need clearly articulated objectives, sharp divisions of labour, specified hierarchies and responsibilities and formalised systems of control. Taylor saw people as near-automatons (robots), potentially troublesome perhaps, but basically programmable given proper supervision and appropriate incentives. In Taylor’s eyes, the existence of contradiction and ambiguity in organisations were signs of managerial weakness, something which could and should be eliminated. His work is basically a recipe for clarity and control (Drummond, 2000).…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The chosen article that will be explored through this essay, by Locke, Edwin A. (1982) The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An Evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 7(1). This main source believes that Taylor was the Founding father of Scientific Management, being his key principle, featuring the one best way. However in order to understand the reasoning and logic behind Taylors principles, one must understand the context of the time to make informed decision of the validity of the principles. Fifty percent of the sources believe that Taylor’s principles have transcended through time, forming the basis for modern day contemporary organizations, such as IBM. However the other half of the sources believe that Taylor’s principles have been a detriment to society, which have dehumanized the workforce, creating men as machines, believing that this has established the elements of today’s bureaucratic society.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) Scientific management: In Principles of Scientific Management (1911)Fredrick Winslow Taylor, the “Father” of scientific management utilises scientific methods to define the “one best way” for a job to be done…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taylor (1911) in his scientific management theory explains his 4 basic principles, on how to manage. Firstly the manager needs to know what to do and how to do it in order to achieve maximum efficiency. The manager then needs to recruit his employees and train them so as to achieve greater results in the quickest time. He also explains on how the manager will need to keep his employees in check, and reward them with benefits for good performance. Also the manager needs to divide the work responsibility amongst the workforce and take some responsibility himself.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical organization theory has been around since the early 1900’s. This theory is associated with scientific management, bureaucratic theory, and administrative theory. A man named Frederick Taylor came up with scientific management theory in 1917 (Walonick, 1993). It was also called “Taylorism”. There are four principles to classical organizational theory. Find the “best way” to do the tasks, match workers to each task very carefully, use awards and punishment systems and supervise employees carefully, and planning and controlling (Walonick, 1993). Max Weber (1947) added on to Taylor’s theory. Weber came up with the bureaucratic theory, which had more “hierarchical structure of power” (Walonick,…

    • 1127 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Leadership and Management

    • 3764 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Wang CL and Ahmed PK (2003) Organisational learning; a critical review. The Learning Organissation. 10(1) 8-17.…

    • 3764 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    The purpose of this essay will be to argue the assumptions of classical theories regarding hierarchical management and how it is essential in modern day times. The ranks within a hypothetical pyramid determine the position of an employee within any organisations. Classical management still takes place in today’s management concepts. Max Weber studied bureaucratic organisations, Henri Fayol created the administrative principles and Fredrick Winslow Taylor researched scientific management. These influential people took apart in the formation of hierarchy. The concept of classical management, Weber’s theories and hierarchy will be argued further.…

    • 3063 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Understanding Organisations

    • 6754 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Organisations, which have been developed over decades, embrace dynamic and complex elements and structures. Working in organisations requires leaders, managers and staff members to pay attention to these features in order to understand the organizational life and the way it works.…

    • 6754 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The similarities are most evident between the works of these theorists. It is clear that Weber used Taylor’s theory as a guide. Taylor ultimately set the track for modern managerial structures. He was the first theorist to question what a fair day’s work and a fair day’s pay truly were. Many of the elements Taylor researched still play a major part in organisations to date, despite being criticised by Trade Unions of the time. They “strongly opposed scientific management techniques. They viewed the piece-rate system as a return to ‘sweat shop’ exploitation of labour by management “(Morley et al, 2013 p.16). Another flaw in Taylor’s scientific management was his inability to regard the role of senior management within the organisation and it also failed to deal with the relationship between the organisation and the environment (Morley et al, 2013). However, despite all the negativity surrounding scientific management, Morley et al (2013) suggests that “it formally established management as a specialist area, introduced scientific analysis to the work place and provided framework” for solving problems with in the business. Similarly, Weber’s theory of bureaucratic management is also a very powerful influence in business today. This is “testimony to the importance of his work” (Morley et al, 2013 p. 17). However, in order for bureaucracy to work effectively it must be understood in order to avoid the business being controlled by it (Morley et al,2013). Morley et al (2013) states that similarly to Taylor, “Weber’s work had enormous influence on management thought and is still relevant in today’s business…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Organisation structure can have significant effects on its employees, such as performance and satisfaction. Not everyone prefers the flexibility and freedom of an organic structure or the rigidness of a mechanistic structure and also the culture has to be taken into consideration; high power distance or low power distance.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of scientific management was developed by Frederick Taylor (1856-1915) in late 19th century. The core idea of scientific management was to increase the efficiency of workers through rationalization and standardization of work. The main concepts and techniques used to achieve increased efficiency were division of labour, time and motion studies, work measurements and piece-rate wages.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSINESS IA HL IB

    • 4065 Words
    • 17 Pages

    - - -. “Organizational Structure.” Afterword. Business and Management. By Paul Hoang. Victoria, Australia: IBID Press, 2007. 208, 216-219.…

    • 4065 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With those evocative words, Frederick W. Taylor had begun his highly influential book; “The Principles of Scientific Management” indicating his view regarding management practices. As one of the most influential management theorists, Taylor is widely acclaimed as the ‘father of scientific management’. Taylor had sought “the ‘one best way’ for a job to be done” (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg & Coulter, 2003, p.39). Northcraft and Neale (1990, p.41) state that “Scientific management took its name from the careful and systematic observational techniques it used to design jobs and arrange work for the rank-and-file factory worker.” From this portrayal it can be deduced that scientific management, as the name indicates, indeed is ‘scientific’; i.e. based on proven facts rather than guesswork. Although many others have contributed to it, the work of Taylor is generally regarded as the key principles of scientific management theory.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics