Preview

Criticism In Politics, By Arnold Kling's The Three Language Of Politics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
734 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criticism In Politics, By Arnold Kling's The Three Language Of Politics
We as humans are given a great gift, the gift of language. We can transmit complex thought by simply uttering a few sounds. These ideas have helped build American cooperation; Americans do love to work with one another. However, when it comes to big “P” politics, we cannot be more divided. In The Three Language of Politics written by Arnold Kling, Kling states, we tend to divide ourselves in one of three tribes (Kling 2017). Though Kling state his libertarian leanings he still gives the other views just as fair repetition. Kling, divided the main political view into a three-axis model, those being: progressives, conservatives, and libertarians. It is from the language used in each of these respected tribes that we form the base of our political …show more content…
However, Kling does state these are not to be take as a one-to-one correlation for everyone, but merely a general overview (Kling).
For progressives, their ideal hero is the champion of the downtrodden. The ideal hero, cannot stand idly by and watch some people who are indifferent to the oppression of women, minorities, and the poor. conservatives, hero is a person who champions Western values. Their hero, does not tolerate people who do not cherish American moral virtues and American traditions which form the bedrock of our civilization. Lastly, libertarians, hero is always fighting for one’s individual rights. Their hero, will always resist government constricting an individual’s right to make one’s own choices (Kling 2017). Kling mentions, what is called the “The Donald Trump Phenomenon.” Which is how Kling and others were completely surprised how Trump was a true dark horse candidate; later becoming president. Kling goes on to state that that three-axis model does not apply to Trump, and even going on to create his on axis of “populist versus elite” (Kling 2017). However, when examining Trump from the lens of conservatives, are divided into two sub-factions, one is against him on the grounds he could destroy the party and the other state that he is better option than Hillary Clinton (Kling
…show more content…
During the focus group, the question was asked: “If the election was held again today, who would still vote for him [Donald Trump]?” All but a few raised their hand, stating he failed them on some level. Shortly after those comments were mean, everyone stated arguing only three minutes in. Luntz states, every time he does these kinds of groups everyone starts arguing when Trump is mentioned. Showing that even people in the same part cannot make a consensus on him (Smith, S, J Tyrangiel, T Clancy, J Kaplan, and M Haeringer

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Incoming graduates of political science are aware of the restriction that the structure of the government imbeds, including the branches of the government generating unfair control of power in the executive branch, and partisan polarization. America’s basic construction of government, the three branches in parallel with the checks and balance system, creates problems such as a single executive leader inducing unfair policy making, and two main political party advancing partisan polarization. Partisan polarization is the ideology that an individual’s stance on political controversies are limiting of their party identification: republican, democrat. For example, controversies today revealing partisan polarizations are: equal reproductive rights,…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    what exactly is a hero? Who can be classified as heroic? From my perspective a hero is not only someone who wears a cape, has superhuman strength, wears fancy clothes or someone who saves his lady from the bad guy; however he is someone who stands for strength, bravery, humbleness, justice and equality. I believe a hero is someone who truly intends to make the world a better place for all people. He stands for what he believes in even though he may encounter danger and obstacle. We often watch movies with action heroes fighting for a good cause, but these heroes cause us ignore the real life heroes such as Cesar Chavez and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Cesar Chavez and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr are genuinely the definition of a hero.…

    • 398 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is a hero?A hero is someone who can save someone else’s life or teach them things that can change their life. Three people that inspire me or made me want to make a difference in the world are Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr. , and Rosa Parks. They are my heros because they done things that they believe in and that they thought were fair because they wanted to make sure everyone had rights to do whatever they want whenever they wanted to do it. I believe that everyone has a voice in the world and if u believe in something u should do it no matter what the risks are.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A hero is a person who believes that their enemy is not inherently malevolent, but also has wit and bravery. A good example of a hero is Benjamin Church. Church was an Englishman who went from leading a small group of men to leading an army. Church was brave, although he was injured he returned to war. church was also compassionate, he is against englishman who enslave or kill innocent Indians. Lastly Church had wit, his tactics for building an effective army and planned attacks were what brought the war to an end.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political power of words lies not primarily in their form – that is, in speech – or even in the meanings of the words they are directly linked to, but in the totality of brain circuitry that activation can spread to: the frames, metaphors, prototypes, metonymies, and the entire system of concepts. Words matter. They shape our politics – and our lives.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over the duration of this course, we have also been undergoing our current primary presidential election race, as Abramowitz has expressed in “The Polarized Public?” the polarization, the divide, that separates individuals as well as certain groups of people from each other and their beliefs has been evident in these debates. Many such as Fiorina and his coauthors may express the situation to be on the contrary, but Abramowitz even mentions that Fiorina fails to acknowledge that in Americans today “sorting by party is actually an important contributor to the growing ideological polarization among the public and especially among the politically engaged public” (pg. XV, Abramowitz, A.), it is evident that…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When involved with debates of any subject, there are always those people who never really seem to know where they stand. Throughout most of Gup’s life, he found himself flexible on a variety of opposing arguments. He states that he would linger in the ‘no man’s land between opposing arguments’, and wished to be drawn to one side, but found advantages and disadvantages in both. When he grew to accept his ‘confusion’, he realized that people like him are needed for the world to function. He, along with others like him, act as a bridge between opposing arguments, and without them, different groups would be completely divided. He believes that every argument needs a few ‘wobblies’ – those who don’t know where they stand – to hold the common ground. In our lives, there are always people around us who seem to know exactly where they stand, and don’t hesitate in making everybody in the general vicinity aware of it as well. It always seems that no matter how the conversation begins, it always gets drawn to the familiar subjects, whether intended or not. People who are very certain of where they stand can be drawn into conflict by the smallest of issues. This is especially true during election years. Being a liberal in a broadly conservative school, I agree with Gup, saying that we need the in-between people to keep a balance between arguments. When the level of certainty is high, it’s always good to have a few wobblies around. Wobblies show that strong opinions often get the better of us, and we shouldn’t focus so much on what divides us. I agree with the author’s opinion to a large extent. I, like the author, do not have a strong stance when it comes to certain topics such as political issues. And that is okay with me. The writing in this piece is very well done which makes sense because the author teaches journalism at a college. The author uses several good writing techniques like a well formed and obvious thesis in the first paragraph and excellent word choice. Words…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atticus Finch Hero Essay

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A hero encompasses many qualities, not just bravery or strength, but more importantly, the ability to inspire others. To Kill A Mockingbird, by Nelle Harper Lee, explores themes such as racism, innocence, and the morality of youth in Southern America in the 1930s. Topping the list of the American Film Institute’s 100 years...100 Heroes and Villains is a main character of the story, Atticus Finch. The American Film Institute defines a hero as “a character who prevails in extreme circumstances and dramatizes a strong sense of morality, courage, and purpose. Though they may be ambiguous or flawed, they often sacrifice themselves to show humanity at its best”(American Film Institute para.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise is the ability to meet in the middle, but the middle ground has practically vanished in this country as Schmuhl states. Schmuhl expresses this by stating “it’s almost as though separate tribes now populate the country, each with a definite outlook in conflict with the opposite viewpoint or condition”. Schmuhl shares in his writing that America is missing the broader, common experience, that contributes to the unity of the country…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapters 10 through 12 in Political Polarization in American Politics explain what causes polarization and who is involved. This reading supports the ideas from chapter four which says that politics has become polarized on more issues than before due to conflict extension. Both Congress and the voters are deeply polarized, driven by two major factors, coming from a change in government and social interactions as well as a “long-term realignment”. Therefore, polarization comes from previous political beliefs and alignments, splitting Republican and Democratic opinions on how much government interaction should be present on policies such as welfare, tax cuts, and Obamacare. Increased competition leads to higher stakes in every political dispute,…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    McKenna, George, and Stanley Feingold. Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Political Issues. Dubuque, IA: McGraw Hill, 2007. Print.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The polarization of individual viewpoints and political ideologies has become a matter of increasing concern in the United States. In the words of Professor Cass Sunstein of the Harvard Law School, “The greatest danger of the echo chambers is unjustified extremism...if you get a group of people who tend to think something, after they talk to each other, they end up thinking a more extreme version of what they thought before.” We as individuals tend to seek discussions that support our own beliefs, pushing us into echo chambers that reverberate with our own ideologies. This drives us farther and farther apart from those who hold opposing viewpoints.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conservative vs. Liberal

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Not just as Americans but as human beings we all want the same basic things in our daily lives. We all seek freedom and yearn for prosperity. We all seek for what is fair in life and not just our lives separately, but the lives of our nation’s people. We want less people to suffer as much as possible, especially our children. We all seek the best for our health being. We all want a crime free nation and crime free streets in our communities. We all want a freedom to speak and voice our opinions; yet the one major key argument is how do we achieve all of these? With all that has been going on in our nation’s economy, we begin to analyze one of the very most important, yet controversial political issue that we are facing: Liberal or Conservative? Although we are united as a whole nation, but when concerning our nation’s political policies we are very much divided. Each of us has our own beliefs and our own opinion, but the beauty of this is that this is what makes this country. This belief was instilled in our bloods from the day this great nation was formed, by our political forefathers up until now. We sometimes call these beliefs Left or Right based on the political spectrum. The political spectrum We have learned to become conservative toward the nation, our nation’s people and our nation’s policies, as well as we have learned to become liberal toward the nation, our people and our nation’s policies. Which is right you might ask, that all depends on every individuals different view and opinion to do what is right and best for them? Conservatives and Liberals differ on what they believe is correct for the government. They seek different essential needs, different government program support, different social views, and very different economic views.…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the current presidential race underway, a certain level of political segregation is brought to light. While Republican candidates volley vigorously on ideas such as a flat tax rate and the termination of Planned Parenthood, Democratic nominees have no other option but to support the contrasting opinions of a graduated tax and the continual funding of Planned Parenthood. Political parties hold steadfast to their viewpoints, which are not to be shared by the opposing faction. Presidential candidate, Donald Trump, envisions a starkly different America, than that envisioned by Bernie Sanders. There is no middle ground. As voting american citizens, we must give our support to one vision or another. There is no flexibility in our voice. Naturally…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Early Progressive Era

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas is a progressive Ideal. Progressive Ideals have been used all the time throughout history. What makes a progressive, is when someone takes their ideas and takes action in trying to make them happen. Two certain people that fall in the categorizes of developing progressive Ideals is, muckraker, Thomas Nast, and cartoonist Dr. Suess. In more than one ways than another, both of these people have created a difference in the world in quite similar ways, but for different reasons.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays