Preview

Cross-Docking: State of the Art

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
23235 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cross-Docking: State of the Art
Omega 40 (2012) 827–846

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Omega journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/omega

Review

Cross-docking: State of the art
Jan Van Belle n, Paul Valckenaers, Dirk Cattrysse
KU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Celestijnenlaan 300B, B-3001 Heverlee (Leuven), Belgium

a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history: Received 23 June 2011 Accepted 17 January 2012 Processed by Pesch Available online 25 January 2012 Keywords: Cross-docking Logistics Classification

abstract
Cross-docking is a logistics strategy in which freight is unloaded from inbound vehicles and (almost) directly loaded into outbound vehicles, with little or no storage in between. This paper presents an overview of the cross-docking concept. Guidelines for the successful use and implementation of crossdocking are discussed and several characteristics are described that can be used to distinguish between different cross-dock types. In addition, this paper presents an extensive review of the existing literature about cross-docking. The discussed papers are classified based on the problem type that is tackled (ranging from more strategic or tactical to more operational problems). Based on this review, several opportunities to improve and extend the current research are indicated. & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Contents 1. 2. 3. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827 When and how to use cross-docking? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 829 Cross-dock characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



References: [1] Apte UM, Viswanathan S. Effective cross docking for improving distribution efficiencies. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 2000;3(3):291–302. [2] Boysen N, Fliedner M. Cross dock scheduling: classification, literature review and research agenda. Omega 2010;38(6):413–22. [3] 2008 cross-docking trends report; 2008. /http://www.saddlecrk.com/ whitepaperS. [4] 2011 cross-docking trends report; 2011. /http://www.saddlecrk.com/ whitepaperS. [5] Bartholdi III JJ, Gue KR. The best shape for a crossdock. Transportation Science 2004;38(2):235–44. [6] Galbreth MR, Hill JA, Handley S. An investigation of the value of crossdocking for supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics 2008;29(1):225–39. [7] Li Y, Lim A, Rodrigues B. Crossdocking—JIT scheduling with time windows. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2004;55(12):1342–51. J. Van Belle et al. / Omega 40 (2012) 827–846 845 [8] Schaffer B. Implementing a successful crossdocking operation. IIE Solutions 1997;29(10):34–6. [9] Kinnear E. Is there any magic in cross-docking? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 1997;2(2):49–52. [10] Glossary of the Material Handling Industry of America (MHIA); 2011. /http://www.mhia.org/learning/glossaryS. [11] Vahdani B, Zandieh M. Scheduling trucks in cross-docking systems: robust meta-heuristics. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2010;58(1):12–24. [12] Wen M, Larsen J, Clausen J, Cordeau JF, Laporte G. Vehicle routing with crossdocking. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2009;60(12):1708–18. [13] Witt CE. Crossdocking: concepts demand choice. Material Handling Engineering 1998;53(7):44–9. [14] Cook RL, Gibson B, MacCurdy D. A lean approach to cross docking. Supply Chain Management Review 2005;9(2):54–9. [15] Chen F, Song K. Minimizing makespan in two-stage hybrid cross docking scheduling problem. Computers & Operations Research 2009;36(6):2066–73. [16] Vis IF, Roodbergen KJ. Positioning of goods in a cross-docking environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2008;54(3):677–89. [17] Stalk G, Evans P, Shulman LE. Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review 1992;70(2):57–69. [18] Napolitano M. Cross dock fuels growth at Dots. Logistics Management 2011;50(2):30–4. [19] de Neufville R, de Barros AG, Belin S. Optimal configuration of airport passenger buildings for travelers. Journal of Transportation Engineering 2002;128(3):211–7. [20] Ashford NJ, Mumayiz SA, Wright PH. Airport engineering: planning, design, and development of 21st-century airports. fourth ed. Wiley; 2011. [21] Dorndorf U, Drexl A, Nikulin Y, Pesch E. Flight gate scheduling: state-of-theart and recent developments. Omega 2007;35(3):326–34. [22] Agustina D, Lee CKM, Piplani R. A review: mathematical models for cross dock planning. International Journal of Engineering Business Management 2010;2(2):47–54. [23] Li Z, Low MYH, Lim YG, Ma B. Optimal decision-making on product ranking for crossdocking/warehousing operations. In: Proceedings of the sixth IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN 2008); 2008. p. 871–6. [24] Richardson HL. Cross docking: information flow saves space. Transportation & Distribution 1999;40(11):51–4. [25] Kreng VB, Chen FT. The benefits of a cross-docking delivery strategy: a supply chain collaboration approach. Production Planning & Control 2008;19(3): 229–41. [26] Waller MA, Cassady CR, Ozment J. Impact of cross-docking on inventory in a decentralized retail supply chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2006;42(5):359–82. [27] Yu W, Egbelu PJ. Scheduling of inbound and outbound trucks in cross docking systems with temporary storage. European Journal of Operational Research 2008;184(1):377–96. [28] Gue KR, Kang K. Staging queues in material handling and transportation systems. In: Proceedings of the 33rd conference on winter simulation; 2001. p. 1104–8. [29] Pearson Specter S. How to crossdock successfully. Modern Materials Handling 2004;59(1):42–6. [30] Yan H, Tang Sl. Pre-distribution and post-distribution cross-docking operations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2009;45(6):843–59. [31] Kumar S. A study of the supermarket industry and its growing logistics capabilities. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 2008;36(3):192–211. [32] Napolitano M. Making the move to cross docking: a practical guide to planning, designing, and implementing a cross dock operation. Warehousing Education and Research Council (WERC); 2000. [33] Gue KR. The effects of trailer scheduling on the layout of freight terminals. Transportation Science 1999;33(4):419–28. [34] Sung CS, Song SH. Integrated service network design for a cross-docking supply chain network. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2003;54(12):1283–95. [35] Donaldson H, Johnson EL, Ratliff, HD, Zhang M. Schedule-driven crossdocking networks. Technical report 9904, Atlanta, GA, USA: Georgia Institute of Technology; 1999. [36] Musa R, Arnaout JP, Jung H. Ant colony optimization algorithm to solve for the transportation problem of cross-docking network. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2010;59(1):85–92. [37] Sung CS, Yang W. An exact algorithm for a cross-docking supply chain network design problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2008;59(1):119–36. ¨ ¨ [38] Gumus M, Bookbinder JH. Cross-docking and its implications in location– distribution systems. Journal of Business Logistics 2004;25(2):199–228. [39] Jayaraman V, Ross A. A simulated annealing methodology to distribution network design and management. European Journal of Operational Research 2003;144(3):629–45. [40] Ross A, Jayaraman V. An evaluation of new heuristics for the location of cross-docks distribution centers in supply chain network design. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2008;55(1):64–79. [41] Bachlaus M, Pandey MK, Mahajan C, Shankar R, Tiwari MK. Designing an integrated multi-echelon agile supply chain network: a hybrid taguchiparticle swarm optimization approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2008;19(6):747–61. [42] Lim A, Miao Z, Rodrigues B, Xu Z. Transshipment through crossdocks with inventory and time windows. Naval Research Logistics 2005;52(8):724–33. [43] Miao Z, Fu K, Fei Q, Wang F. Meta-heuristic algorithm for the transshipment problem with fixed transportation schedules. In: New frontiers in applied artificial intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2008;5027:601–10. [44] Chen P, Guo Y, Lim A, Rodrigues B. Multiple crossdocks with inventory and time windows. Computers & Operations Research 2006;33(1):43–63. [45] Ma H, Miao Z, Lim A, Rodrigues B. Crossdocking distribution networks with setup cost and time window constraint. Omega 2011;39(1):64–72. [46] Lee YH, Jung JW, Lee KM. Vehicle routing scheduling for cross-docking in the supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2006;51(2):247–56. [47] Liao CJ, Lin Y, Shih SC. Vehicle routing with cross-docking in the supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications 2010;37(10):6868–73. [48] Peck KE. Operational analysis of freight terminals handling less than container load shipments. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign; 1983. [49] Tsui LY, Chang CH. A microcomputer based decision support tool for assigning dock doors in freight yards. Computers & Industrial Engineering 1990;19(1–4): 309–12. [50] Tsui LY, Chang CH. An optimal solution to a dock door assignment problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering 1992;23(1–4):283–6. ´ [51] Bermudez R, Cole MH. A genetic algorithm approach to door assignments in breakbulk terminals. Technical report MBTC 1084, Fayettevilee, AR, USA: Mack-Blackwell Rural Transportation Center, University of Arkansas; 2001. [52] Cohen Y, Keren B. Trailer to door assignment in a synchronous cross-dock operation. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management 2009;5(5):574–90. [53] Oh Y, Hwang H, Cha CN, Lee S. A dock-door assignment problem for the Korean mail distribution center. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2006;51(2): 288–96. [54] Bartholdi III JJ, Gue KR. Reducing labor costs in an LTL crossdocking terminal. Operations Research 2000;48(6):823–32. [55] Brown AM. Improving the efficiency of hub operations in a less-than-truckload distribution network. Master’s thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2003. [56] Bozer YA, Carlo HJ. Optimizing inbound and outbound door assignments in less-than-truckload crossdocks. IIE Transactions 2008;40(11):1007–18. [57] Yu VF, Sharma D, Murty KG. Door allocations to origins and destinations at less-than-truckload trucking terminals. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering 2008;2(1):1–15. [58] Wang JF, Regan A. Real-time trailer scheduling for crossdock operations. Transportation Journal 2008;47(2):5–20. [59] McWilliams DL. A dynamic load-balancing scheme for the parcel hub-scheduling problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2009;57(3):958–62. [60] Chen F, Lee CY. Minimizing the makespan in a two-machine cross-docking flow shop problem. European Journal of Operational Research 2009;193(1):59–72. [61] Arabani ARB, Ghomi SMTF, Zandieh M. Meta-heuristics implementation for scheduling of trucks in a cross-docking system with temporary storage. Expert Systems with Applications 2011;38(3):1964–79. [62] Boysen N, Fliedner M, Scholl A. Scheduling inbound and outbound trucks at cross docking terminals. OR Spectrum 2010;32(1):135–61. [63] Forouharfard S, Zandieh M. An imperialist competitive algorithm to schedule of receiving and shipping trucks in cross-docking systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2010;51(9):1179–93. [64] Arabani ARB, Ghomi SMTF, Zandieh M. A multi-criteria cross-docking scheduling with just-in-time approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2010;49(5–8):741–56. [65] Vahdani B, Soltani R, Zandieh M. Scheduling the truck holdover recurrent dock cross-dock problem using robust meta-heuristics. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2010;46(5):769–83. [66] Soltani R, Sadjadi SJ. Scheduling trucks in cross-docking systems: a robust meta-heuristics approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2010;46(5):650–66. [67] Larbi R, Alpan G, Baptiste P, Penz B. Scheduling cross docking operations under full, partial and no information on inbound arrivals. Computers & Operations Research 2011;38(6):889–900. [68] Alpan G, Larbi R, Penz B. A bounded dynamic programming approach to schedule operations in a cross docking platform. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2011;60(3):385–96. [69] Rosales CR, Fry MJ, Radhakrishnan R. Transfreight reduces costs and balances workload at Georgetown crossdock. Interfaces 2009;39(4):316–28. [70] Acar MK. Robust dock assignments at less-than-truckload terminals. Master’s thesis, University of South Florida; 2004. [71] McWilliams DL, Stanfield PM, Geiger CD. The parcel hub scheduling problem: a simulation-based solution approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2005;49(3):393–412. [72] McWilliams DL, Stanfield PM, Geiger CD. Minimizing the completion time of the transfer operations in a central parcel consolidation terminal with unequal-batch-size inbound trailers. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2008;54(4):709–20. [73] McWilliams DL. Genetic-based scheduling to solve the parcel hub scheduling problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2009;56(4):1607–16. [74] McWilliams DL. Iterative improvement to solve the parcel hub scheduling problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2010;59(1):136–44. [75] Chmielewski A, Naujoks B, Janas M, Clausen U. Optimizing the door assignment in LTL-terminals. Transportation Science 2009;43(2):198–210. 846 J. Van Belle et al. / Omega 40 (2012) 827–846 [76] Lim A, Ma H, Miao Z. Truck dock assignment problem with time windows and capacity constraint in transshipment network through crossdocks. In: Computational science and its applications—ICCSA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2006;3982:688–97. [77] Lim A, Ma H, Miao Z. Truck dock assignment problem with operational time constraint within crossdocks. In: Advances in applied artificial intelligence. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2006;4031:262–71. [78] Miao Z, Lim A, Ma H. Truck dock assignment problem with operational time constraint within crossdocks. European Journal of Operational Research 2009;192(1):105–15. [79] Boysen N. Truck scheduling at zero-inventory cross docking terminals. Computers & Operations Research 2010;37(1):32–41. [80] Shakeri M, Low MYH, Li Z. A generic model for crossdock truck scheduling and truck-to-door assignment problems. In: Proceedings of the sixth IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN 2008); 2008. p. 857–64. [81] Li ZP, Low MYH, Shakeri M, Lim YG. Crossdocking planning and scheduling: problems and algorithms. Technical report STR_V10_N3_06_POM, Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology; 2009. ¨ [82] Werners B, Wulfing T. Robust optimization of internal transports at a parcel sorting center operated by Deutsche Post World Net. European Journal of Operational Research 2010;201(2):419–26. [83] Sandal S. Staging approaches to reduce overall cost in a crossdock environment. Master’s thesis, University of Missouri; 2005. ´ ´ ´ [84] Alvarez-Perez GA, Gonzalez-Velarde JL, Fowler JW. Crossdocking—just in time scheduling: an alternative solution approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2009;60(4):554–64. [85] Stickel M. Planung und steuerung von crossdocking-zentren. Dissertation, ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ Institut fur Fordertechnik und Logistiksysteme, Fakultat fur Maschinenbau, ¨ Universitat Karlsruhe; 2006. [86] Magableh GM, Rossetti MD, Mason S. Modeling and analysis of a generic cross docking facility. In: Proceedings of the 37th conference on winter simulation; 2005. p. 1613–20. [87] Tang SL, Yan H. Pre-distribution vs. post-distribution for cross-docking with transshipments. Omega 2010;38(3–4):192–202. [88] Rohrer M. Simulation and cross docking. In: Proceedings of the 27th conference on winter simulation 1995, p. 846–9. [89] Babiceanu RF, Chen FF. Development and applications of holonic manufacturing systems: a survey. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2006;17(1): 111–31. [90] McFarlane DC, Bussmann S. Developments in holonic production planning and control. International Journal of Production Planning and Control 2000;11(6):522–36. [91] Van Brussel H, Wyns J, Valckenaers P, Bongaerts L, Peeters P. Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA. Computers in Industry 1998;37(3):255–74. ´ ´ [92] Bongaerts L, Monostori L, McFarlane D, Kadar B. Hierarchy in distributed shop floor control. Computers in Industry 2000;43(2):123–37. [93] Valckenaers P, Van Brussel H. Holonic manufacturing execution systems. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology 2005;54(1):427–32. [94] Verstraete P, Valckenaers P, Van Brussel H, Saint Germain B, Hadeli, Van Belle J. Towards robust and efficient planning execution. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2008;21(3):304–14.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The problem basically consists of finding the optimum set of routes that represent the lowest possible total cost and/or total travel time. The plant is dealing with the repositioning of trucks to serve its supply demand and determining a number of transportation units that optimally balance supply requirements against the cost of maintaining the transportation units. In order to increase truck utilization and achieve better performance, the plant has to adequately and efficiently ensure the scheduling of a steady supply of hogs.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    bus 101

    • 2893 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Logistics: An important feature of Wal-Mart’s logistics infrastructure was its fast and responsive transportation system. Wal-Mart maintained a strict vigil over its drivers by keeping a record of their activities through the “Private Fleet Driver Handbook”. The purpose of the book was to educate the drivers with regard to the code of conduct. Non-compliance to the hand book would result in the termination of the driver. To make its distribution process more efficient, Wal-Mart also made use of a logistics technique known as ‘cross docking’. In this system, the finished goods were directly supplied to the customers. The system reduced the handling and storage of finished goods, virtually eliminating the role of the distribution centers and…

    • 2893 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Dornier, P., Ernst, R., Fender, M., & Kouvelis, P. (1998). Global operations and logistics:…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. The transportation problem described above can be solved mathematically using a computer package. The solution to the problem using excel solver are given in the following table.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Minnetonka Receiving

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    B. The next possible solution to the concerns of the manager pertaining to the docks issue is the adjustment of the workers hours. Most businesses use a standard three shift system. In the logistics field a technique of staggered start time schedule for the workforces seems to require fewer people to get the same amount of work done. The staggered start schedule…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forum 3

    • 374 Words
    • 1 Page

    David, Pierre, & Stewart, Richard (2010). International Logistics. 3rd Edition. Mason, OH: Thomson ISBN 13: 978-1-111-21955-0…

    • 374 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Blanchard, D. (2009, July). The Dos and Don 'ts of Third-Party Logistics. Industry Week, 258(7), 43-44. Retrieved February 14, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1780053281).…

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dock Scheduling Software

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    C3 Reservations is a dock and appointment scheduling software provided by C3 Solution Company. This software is a web-based dock scheduling system which could allow vendors to book and distribution center managers to optimize the incoming and outgoing shipments in one or multiple distribution center. The most three benefits of this software include increasing of the productivity of the reservation desk, increasing availability of inventory through decreased turn-around times and increasing dock efficiency. For example, the software could reduce time-consuming phone calls, emails and faxes from vendors and carriers, who would like to schedule delivery and pickups and check the schedule status, in order to increase the productivity. The software could provide enterprise-wide visibility of real-time status of inbound and outbound shipments. Also, the software could balance the workload at the dock throughout the day and ensure the high-demand products are handled as a priority.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CTC case study

    • 2492 Words
    • 7 Pages

    CTC’s problem is within its traditional pricing system, with both its inefficiency and lack of flexibility. The worksheets were formatted to show both the “ideal”( unconstrained and realistic ( constrained) circumstances, to analyze them and come for the best possible solution within the boundaries. One big concept that was present in determining which quantities were “optimal” was demand elasticity. Trends were found, and the conclusion that a elasticity with an absolute value of 1, represented an overall revenue maximizing point was discovered. Unfortunately those specific combinations were out of reach due to the fact that they went past the weight capacity of the ships( 24000 tons). Going back to the problem with the pricing strategy, its biggest problem was that in calculating the optimal prices, it took into consideration the weight of cargo and the volume of the port. This meant that for each route, each price or quantity was subject to an individual constraint, and all the other ten routes were not tied to each other in any way. the new pricing model proposed, takes into consideration that there is no individual constraints but rather an overall constraint which is the weight and volume of the ship travelling those routes, so within those constraints what dictates price is the demand. It was clearly stated that 40’ containers were not only preferred but more efficient to be used than 20’ containers, so this new pricing model brings in a higher ratio of the TEU in 40” to 20”, which could not only mean more efficiency , but lower costs in the long run. Finally, while doing the study , it was discovered that the optimal quantities that led to the maximum attainable revenue were not possible to attain due to the overload capacity of the boat, so one of the major recommendations was to loosen the weight constraint during the high season, but also implement a different policy for the…

    • 2492 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merloni Analysis

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The next important factor is the locations in the network. The pilot in Milano was approximately 350-400 km from the central warehouse. However, the site locations have an impact on the success of cross-docking sites. Looking at two different locations Roma, 175 km away, and Catanzaro, 600 km…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    United States railroad companies transport millions of freight cars a year over their network. Railroad companies rely on their network to move shipments from city to city and state to state. Each railroad company has a service-design department which coordinates the movement of railcars, crew, and locomotives over the railroad’s network. Creating an operating plan for the system is a challenging task because train scheduling consists of designing train routes, days of operation, timings, and routing blocks to minimize cost. The operating plan is responsible for the flow of the three important railroad assets: crew, locomotives, and cars. The expense to maintain all three commodities runs in billions of dollars.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    7-11 Japan

    • 3765 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Secondly, SEJ’s transportation system is not only relatively efficient but also responsive and capable of rapid-replenishment. The system is a cross-docking transportation model with goods flow through distribution centers. Advantages as well disadvantages of the model are discussed.…

    • 3765 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Zara

    • 4526 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Title Warehouse Inventory Management A Case Study in Retail Fashion Industry Company Name Zara International Objective for a warehouse management is fully utilize the space, improved the productivity of operations flow and reduce the inventory carrying cost. From the case of Zara, I found that they arranging the cross-dock rather then typical storage function. Because they have the commitment about the order fulfillment time from warehouse to stores, for examples 24 hours to European countries, 48 hours to American and within 72 hours to Japan. So Zaras warehouse needs to have efficient operations arrangement with the automatic handling equipment to achieve the fast fashion goal. (90 words) 1.1…

    • 4526 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Terminal Containers

    • 11474 Words
    • 49 Pages

    In recent years methodological advances regarding container terminal operations have considerably improved. For a detailed description and a comprehensive list of references see, e.g., the operations research literature.…

    • 11474 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Title: Ant colony optimization techniques for the vehicle routing problemAuthor: John E. Bell, Patrick R. McMullenYear: 2004…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays