Preview

Crown Cork and Seal

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1028 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crown Cork and Seal
I Phukan
U T Dallas MBA' 2012

Crown Cork & Seal in 1989 1. What are the most significant factors affecting competition in the metal container industry?

The U.S. Metal can industry was valued at $12.2 billion 1989. There were five firms dominating this industry at that time constituting 61% of the entire market share.
Some significant factors that impacted the competition among these firms were :
Competitive Rivalry within the industry: The major players in the metal container industry comprised of 61% of the market share making intensive competitive rivalry among themselves. The Pricing was very competitive with little room for any significant profit margins. Focus was to enhance capacity utilization and eliminate costly changeovers wherever possible. Providing volume discounts was a common trend to attract more customers. The shrinking customer base attributed to a new low in manufacturer’s margins.
Threat of new entrants : The threat of new entrants in this industry is pretty low since the major market players already dominate the existing market share. The threat for the competing companies lies in its other rivals rather than any new entrant to this specialized industry.
Bargaining Power of the Customers : I feel the bargaining power in this industry for the customers was pretty high at that time. The major customers of this industry were big names like Coca-Cola, Anheuser-Busch, Pepsico Inc. etc. The mergers and consolidations among the numerous bottling industry companies resulted in a shrinkage from 8000 to 800 major players in a matter of 9 years (1980 to 1989). The customers could easily punish the metal container companies by making frequent switches whenever there occured unsatisfactory services or steep pricing.
Bargaining power of suppliers : Steel had been replaced very quickly by aluminum ever since the invention of aluminum cans in 1958. By 1989, aluminum consisted of 99% of the beer and 94% of the soft drink metal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mr. Jax Fashions

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Threat of New Entrants: High. Entry into the market can easily be done by any firms, large or small, with very little startup costs to do so.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chipotle

    • 8563 Words
    • 26 Pages

    -What key threats (in terms of new entrants, product life cycle, product obsolescence, substitute products, etc.) exist for this industry?…

    • 8563 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lululemon Case Study

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Threat of New Entrants: is low because of high hurdles of entry. The industry is categorized by large capital requests, access to distribution channels, large economies of scale and product distinction. New entrants will require spending a lot of time and money to come in to the market, increase cost advantage, and establish loyal customer base.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the brewing industry, barriers to entry were high. Fixed costs increased as a percentage of revenue necessitating brewers to have higher production capacities/minimal efficient production scale to achieve economies of scale. This could be achieved by doubling brewery production, which decreased unit capital costs by 25 percent. In addition, high capital requirements existed since $35-$45 million was required in launch costs and advertising for a new brand. These financial requirements implied a competitive advantage for large brewing companies who were spending approximately $1200 million (about 10 percent of sales) in advertising in 1985. An entering firm had limited access to distribution channels as the wholesalers who served the largest brewers did not carry other brewer's beer. The bargaining power of suppliers is medium since the removal of price controls for aluminum led to sharp increase in can prices and therefore raised cost of packaging materials and for the brewers. Some companies, like Coors, reduced these costs by starting can recycling programs to decrease their dependence on new raw materials. Bargaining power of buyers was high as the independent wholesalers who purchased the beer, and sold and delivered to retail accounts earned low profits. The average return on sales for wholesalers had fallen from 3 percent in 1981 to 2.1 percent in 1984. In addition, the increasing production capacity, desire for companies to enter new markets and promote new products and cost reductions led to a 30…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kohls Industry Analysis

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Threats to this industry include competitors, buyers and suppliers. There is a possibility of new companies or existing rivals stepping up. The buyers can be influence by a variety of factors including current style and budget. The buyers also have bargaining power, as do the sellers.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. How did the beer industry become oligopolistic? What longer-term processes appear to be at work? Can one apply the industry life cycle to the beer industry?…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The two companies that will be the focus of this paper are Anheuser-Busch Companies and Coors Brewing Company (Coors). As of 2009, these two companies held 50.4 percent and 10.8 percent of the U.S. beer market, respectively[1]. The compound annual growth rate of the market value of the U.S. beer industry between 2005 and 2009 was 0.4 percent, reaching $77.6 billion in 2009, while the market volume grew at an even lower 0.2 percent reaching a volume of 24 billion liters.[2] Until 2002, the three major players within the industry, Anheuser-Busch, Coors and Miller Brewing Company, were domestically owned and together earned 75 percent of the industry revenues. This paper focuses on the U.S. beer industry and competitive strategies of two focal companies Anheuser-Busch and Coors, prior to 2009, before global giant InBev acquired Anheuser-Busch. Despite the dominant position of Anheuser-Busch, the different strategies pursued by these two organizations will draw different reactions from each firm, should a significant event impact them. This report highlights the differences in those reactions by (1) presenting an overall view of…

    • 6250 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beer Industry Analysis

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rivalry: The American beer industry includes more than 300 breweries but is dominated by three producers who command approximately 80 percent of the market share. The three power houses are Anheuser-Busch, which has captured 45% of the market share, Miller Brewing, which has tackled 23%, and Adolph Coors, which has the smallest market share at 10%. Currently, the United States beer industry is characterized by flat consumption trends and this is primarily due to greater alcohol awareness, slow population growth and an aging population. The rivalry among existing competitors in the beer industry is definitely strong. The demand for the product is decreasing, which makes it more competitive when trying to gain market share. Switching costs are also very low for consumers, and because of that competition is very intense to gain new market share.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crown Cork and Seal

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The suppliers in the metal can industry are considered powerful since it is dominated by basically 3 aluminum companies and are a highly concentrated industry in itself. Although steel is another raw material used, its usage had declined over the years as aluminum was lighter, were of better quality, less effect…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vershire

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This shows that there aren’t many suppliers of aluminum, and since three of them also manufacture aluminum containers, the limited number of suppliers could be risky.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Administration

    • 11752 Words
    • 48 Pages

    John F. Connelly, Crown Cork & Seal’s ailing octogenarian chairman, stepped down and appointed his long-time disciple, William J. Avery, chief executive officer of the Philadelphia can manufacturer in May 1989. Avery had been president of Crown Cork & Seal since 1981, but had spent the duration of his career in Connelly’s shadow. As Crown’s new CEO, Avery planned to review Connelly’s long-followed strategy in light of the changing industry outlook. The metal container industry had changed considerably since Connelly took over Crown’s reins in 1957. American National had just been acquired by France’s state-owned Pechiney International, making it the world’s largest beverage can producer. Continental Can, another long-standing rival, was now owned by Peter Kiewit Sons, a privately held construction firm. In 1989, all, or part of Continental’s can-making operations, appeared to be for sale. Reynolds Metals, a traditional supplier of aluminum to can makers, was now also a formidable competitor in cans. The moves by both suppliers and customers of can makers to integrate into can manufacturing themselves had profoundly redefined the metal can industry since John Connelly’s arrival. Reflecting on these dramatic changes, Avery wondered whether Crown, with $1.8 billion in sales, should consider bidding for all or part of Continental Can. Avery also wondered whether Crown should break with tradition and expand its product line beyond the manufacture of metal cans and closures. For 30 years Crown had stuck to its core business, metal can making, but analysts saw little growth potential for metal cans in the 1990s. Industry observers forecast plastics as the growth segment for containers. As Avery mulled over his options, he asked: Was it finally time for a change?…

    • 11752 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aluminum Can Division was one of the largest manufacturers of beverages cans in the US. They had plants spread out across the states. Plants played the role of both the manufacturing and the distributor. They usually produced different size of cans at one location and then served their customers within their geographic region. Customers included large and small breweries and soft drink bottlers. Soft drink bottlers were usually the franchisees of Coca-cola and Pepsi. There were five container manufacturers that accounted for 88% of the market. Those manufacturers normally had plants that located around 200~300 miles of customers and the minimum size for a plant was about five lines with $20 million investment in equipment for each line.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rolls Royce

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Finally, Competition can be occur on different dimensions, like price, product features, support services, delivery time and brand image…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The possibility that new companies may enter an industry and increase competition will reduce the industry’s attractiveness. New entrants may have significant resources that signal the ability to gain market share and influence profitability. When analysing this threat, marketers should examine the barriers to entry and the reaction of existing companies to new competitors. Present…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iron

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Aluminum metal is very useful for packaging. It is used in cans and aluminum foil.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays