Preview

Crown Court: The Role Of The Victim In The Criminal Justice System

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2884 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crown Court: The Role Of The Victim In The Criminal Justice System
II. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

Crown Court was established on 1 January 1972 by Courts Act 1971 to replace the Assize Courts and quarter sessions.
Court of England and Wales Crown is, with the High Court and Court of Appeal, one aspect of the Senior Courts of England and Wales. It is the superior court of first instance in criminal cases; However, for some purposes Crown Court is hierarchically subordinate to the High Court and its divisional courts.
Crown Court performs four main types of activity: appeals against decisions of magistrates; sentencing defendants committed by magistrates' courts, jury trials, and sentencing those convicted in the Crown Court or after trial or pleaded guilty.
Jurisdiction of the Court shall be exercisable
…show more content…
In summary and convicted of serious crimes, justice must be served in each case and the victim's role and perspective is important in ensuring justice.

suspect
There is a concern that defendants falsely accused of rape, might suffer trauma, compounded by negative publicity that can continue to have significant adverse consequences long after such an accusation was proven false. Estimates suggest about 8-10% of all complaints of rape are false.
Starting from the fundamental principle - that the innocent not be punished -implică the presumption of innocence and the right to remain silent during the trial.
In the criminal suspect is not obliged to prove his innocence and therefore this aspect exercising his right to silence can not be attributed to it being a legitimate right. On the other hand the suspect is not obliged to prove his guilt, assuming the evidential burden the criminal investigation and court.
In Article 14, item 3 letter g of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states that everyone charged with a criminal offense has the right not to be compelled to testify against herself or to confess guilt, so a genuine right to silence. We think of that provision that the witness can not be compelled to declare something which indirectly would recognize himself

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority and right to speak the law or render a decision in a legal dispute. According to The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice, jurisdiction can be described as, is a court’s authority to decide a particular case based on (1) who the parties are, and (2) the subject matter of the dispute” (Melvin, 2012, p.58).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shingua Tire Case Study

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Instead, the party arguing for jurisdiction must allege something more than the existence of the…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CJUS 330

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Court Support Staff: Clerks of court, court reporters, pretrial services personnel, bailiffs, court administrators, victim/witness assistance program personnel, rape crisis center…

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In April 1989 five; fifteen year old suspects were convicted of rape and sentenced to nine to fifteen years of jail time. The conclusion was made because of one peace of evidence, hair on the defendant's cloth that matched the hair of the victim. But oddly enough the semen found on the victim did not mach any of the five defendants. The five defendants confessed which reinforced the notion that the five teenagers had anything to do with the rape, which lead to their conviction.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for an admission to be admissible in court, prior to interrogation, the individual must first be informed in clear and unequivocal terms that he has the right to remain silent. In addition, the warning to remain silent must be accompanied by the explanation that anything can be used against the individual in court, and that the individual has the right to have an attorney present during interrogation, and if they can not afford one, then one will be appointed to them. Also, if the individual waives his right to remain silent and for counsel to be present, the police must show that the waiver was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Miranda Warning is intended to protect the guilty as well as the innocent and should be protected at all costs. Without the law, many suspects may be treated unfairly. It is a necessary safeguard. Its intentions were to give suspects an informed choice between their freedom of speech, their right not to speak, but be silent, and the prevent statements being given in a non-voluntary nature. Since the law was imposed police policies and procedures were promoted and enforced that effectively imposed safeguards throughout law enforcement agencies. However, with any law there is also discourse. In this essay I plan to give a brief summary of Miranda and discuss the advantages and disadvantages that Miranda provides for suspects and law enforcement officials.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "You have the right to remain silent." Those words have been popularized in television and movies, and many people recognize them as the opening of the Miranda rights. But what those rights are, and what results when police officers fail to read them to criminal suspects, are topics that are frequently misunderstood. Before Miranda, the right against self-incrimination was never self-executing and always had to be invoked by the suspect. This invocation is what is commonly referred to as ‘pleading the Fifth.' In Miranda, the Supreme Court shifted this burden to the police, and required them to specifically advise suspects of their right to remain silent and their right to have an attorney present during questioning. The Court ruled that all statements or confessions made in the absence of the warnings are inherently involuntary and coerced, and hence inadmissible in court.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    You have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. You have the right to an attorney, if you cannot afford an attorney one will be provided for you. These famous words came from Miranda vs. Arizona, a Supreme Court case that took place March 13, 1963 when Ernesto Miranda was arrested by the Phoenix Police Department, who failed to advise him of his rights to an attorney and his rights to remain silent. This case has given alleged offenders a chance to have their voice be heard and gives them an opportunity to have a fair trial.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Decision Case

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The right to remain silence gives us the vital principle of liberty, and it also gives us privacy ,because the responsibility falls on the officer to build a case.If the person does not meet the burden, they are free to go(Leo,1996).…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The basic division in the structure of criminal courts is between the lower criminal courts – the local courts, Children’s court and Coroner’s court – and the higher criminal courts – the District Court and the Supreme Court. In observing proceedings at the Local, District and Supreme Courts over a period of three days a number of aspects of the criminal justice system were made apparent. The administration, processes and practices of the criminal trial are extremely varied dependent upon the level of criminal court being observed. The distinctions between the workings of the two courts revealed a number of the differences between summary proceedings and trial upon indictment. The cases observed served to provide evidence for the “two tiers of justice” argument. Also the role of the judiciary was perceived as being particularly interesting especially the high level of discretion that they held in the Local Courts and even to an extent in the District Court primarily when there was no jury present.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interrogation has proven to be an effective means of seeking information since it involves giving a suspect an opportunity to express him or herself to prove their innocence. The suspects, however, should be informed of their rights and the consequences based on the information they provide. Failure to this, any information acquired from a suspect is regarded as inadmissible as evidence in a court of law. The United States constitution provides a legal standard into how interrogations are conducted through rights such as the presence of counsel and right against self-incrimination. Despite the measures put to guide interrogation procedures, interrogation techniques have evolved from establishing a rapport with the suspect to outright torture. However, effective interrogation techniques should obtain the required information while preserving the rights of the suspect.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The laws are commonly heard in movie scenes consisting of suspected criminals being taken to questioning (“Miranda v Arizona 1966.” 328). For most police officers, reciting the miranda rights are a part of their everyday life. Miranda’s killer was never arrested because he remained silent after he was told he was allowed to do so, and there wasn't enough evidence gathered to use against him in the court of law. When people are given the right to remain silent, some will do so.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Warnings

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As mentioned before, Prosecutors only need a confession to prosecute, so informing a person of their right to remain silent and their right to an Attorney makes Law Enforcement Officials need more than a confession. Needing more than confession keeps the suspect innocent until the police or other Law Enforcement Agencies find something to prove them…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 5th Amendment

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    are expected to tell the truth, even if that truth was to put you in…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A crime is a serious offense against the public law (Webster Dictionary), but not all serious crimes have a clear victim. Victimless crimes, legal offenses to which all parties consent and no parties are injured, however, account for 86% of the Federal Prison population (Libertarian News). For the reason that the illegal activity is consensually entered into, victimless crimes are often called consensual crimes. Parties consensually entering a crime, or agreeing to enter, may not be considered victims in the eyes of the law nor other parties, but may contribute to other problems and vices. Even though victimless crimes may violate some…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics