Preview

Crt 205 Mapping an Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
861 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Crt 205 Mapping an Argument
Mapping an Argument
The first article chosen was Abortion Is a Form of Genocide by Meredith Eugene Hunt. The issue in this article is “abortion as a form of genocide is accurate by historical and accepted standards of the word’s definition” (Abortion, 2010). I highlighted this as the issue because it includes everything the author is trying to prove to the reader. Hunt wants to make it known that she believes abortion is a form of genocide even though the parameters fit loosely. She also points to the fact that history has shown evidence of genocide, and she uses that history to show the similarities between genocide and abortion. Hunt is making an argument that is both deductive and inductive. In some cases she gives proof in her accusations of the terms abortion and genocide. On the other hand, at times she offers supporting information intended to sway the reader to her side of the argument.
The first conclusion in the article is “abortion does not fit in perfectly with the original use” with the premise being “Hunt identifies the origin of the term “genocide” (Abortion, 2010). This is a valid deductive argument because the term genocide is factual and therefore abortion not fitting exactly into that definition can only be true.
The next conclusion found was “abortion could have genocidal characteristics, but would not qualify as genocide legally”, and the premise is “unwanted preborn children as a group are not “national, ethnic, racial, or religious” (Abortion, 2010). There is an unstated premise here, that unborn babies are not considered as a living, breathing human. This argument is inductive, because the premise is purely based on how an individual sees the situation. Some may see unborn babies as people as soon as the egg is fertilized, but others may require an actual heart beat.
As a whole the article’s main conclusion is that “abortion does not do the reality justice, this is why genocide is the most accurate term we have now” (Abortion, 2010).



References: Seligson, Hannah. "ADHD Drugs Are Appropriately Prescribed for Children." Are Americans Overmedicated? Ed. Tamara Thompson. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2011. At Issue. Rpt. from "The Overmedicated Myth." Daily Beast 2 Mar. 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 16 Nov. 2012. Hunt, Meredith Eugene. "Abortion Is a Form of Genocide." Abortion. Ed. Tamara L. Roleff. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1997. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Abortion Is Genocide by Definition." Sidelines (27 Sept. 2007). Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 16 Nov. 2012.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1 )The relationship between Thompson’s and Marquis’ arguments are very different, but I believe both are compatible with each other. They both take the personhood out of the question, so there is no debate on if the fetus is a human in the womb. Marquis discusses voluntary conception and Thompson does not really discuss that. Thompson’s conclusion deals more with the exceptional cases that Marquis doesn’t explain at all. Thompson weighs the rights of the individuals involved in the pregnancy like the mother and fetus against each other. Marquis, on the other hand, focuses on the concept of what makes killing wrong thus killing a fetus that could possibly have a future like ours is bad. His conclusion focuses on the rights of the victim in the mother/fetus situation. The mortality of the situation in both arguments deals with which person’s rights out ways the other’s. In Marquis, the fetus’ rights outweigh the mother’s rights. In Thompson’s argument, the mother’s rights can trump the fetus’ rights in certain circumstance.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article, “Why we should all be pro-life” written by Joseph Meany, is an effective persuasive piece, with strong in appeals to rhetorical proofs of logos, ethos and pathos. Despite this, it was personally received as a negotiated reading due to the featuring of unsourced "facts" and statistics, whilst additionally being flawed with fallacies of induction.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The statement "defense of abortion", gives us an another view to a problem of abortion. Mostly, Judith Jarvis Thompson protects pro-choice side, and she says that abortion is not immoral, and that it is logically correct action. However there are a lot of anti-abortion philosophers who are not agree with it. So Judith Thompson gives an arguments to proof her sides correctness. She says that mother has all rights to do anything with her body and things in her body. Judith Jarvis Thompson also believes that fetuses are not persons, and killing them is not immoral. However she says that there are also situations, when abortion is incorrect. Also she gave 3 main thought experiments to get another point of view to abortion.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeffrey Reiman, Professor of Philosophy and religion at American University, quotes Patrick Lee in his article, who describes the pro-life argument that abortion is a form of murder. Reiman recites Lee’s description “’that it is wrong to kill an unborn human being because she is identical to an entity that, at some time later in her development, everyone agrees it is wrong to kill” (Reiman, 332). To put weight behind this point, pro-lifers hold that since abortion is murder, it is therefore unconstitutional, and that going against the constitution could lead to significant legal ramifications. This argument belongs to pro-life supporters, but its main focus is not on women’s rights because not all pro-lifers are feminists, while the pro-choice party is mostly consistent of…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy before the fetus is capable of independent life. There are many perspectives on abortion. The main perspectives are pro-life and pro-choice, yet the medical and legal communities also have their own perspectives too. In this research paper, I will show and respond to the pro-life and pro-choice perspectives, and then advance the topic of abortion by integrating the various perspectives on a biological timeline.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    She gives the example that the mother is trapped in a tiny house with a large baby that is already pushing her against the walls and soon will crush her to death. This argument is not consistent with a case of abortion in that it placed the baby outside of the fetus and the baby being oversized. The mother would also have other places in the house to go to possibly avoid getting crushed by the enlarged baby. Even though it says the house is tiny, she is freely able to move and avoid being crushed. The baby that is in the fetus can only be predicted that it will endanger the mother's life. There is not an absolute to that, which makes the abortion a precaution rather than a last resort. If it is a case of consensual sex, the mother took the risk of taking actions that have a product that can lead to this. Instead of killing one person in the abortion, it can be looked at as trying to save two lives instead of one by not having the abortion, thus avoiding the right to life case by deciding which right trumps the other and having the potential to save more than just one life. Even in a case of rape, there is still an outcome where both the mother and child both live instead of one being decided to be the only one to…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe the author is trying to say that unnecessary abortions are a type of genocide and a true tragedy. Proving points on both sides saysing that having female abortions could actually be beneficial in that it would decrease overpopulation. He then argued against this belief by stating that in one generation’s time there would be a girl shortage which could cause many problems, including increasing the sexism of Indian society and denying India of all of the wonderful things that women have to offer.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Poem Analysis: The Mother

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ‘’ The Effects of Abortion,’’ talked about just the women and all the types of effects they go through after abortions. For example, ‘’ abortions affect women physically, emotionally, and spiritually’’ (Tanimu 2013). ‘’ The Effects of Abortions on men,’’ mentioned how abortions have serious emotional harm to some women and how abortions affects men. For example, ‘’while a male is expected to be strong, abortion makes him feel weak’’ (Rue, Tellefsen 1996). I suspected the effects of women after abortions, but do not forget about the withdrawals of men. Each of the points of view that was picked which was, ‘’The Effect of Abortion’’ & ‘’The Effect of Abortion on men’’. Both articles were great to read for information on why people have the withdrawals they do after abortions. That is because each article got their point across that they were trying to make about the effects on men and women after abortion. Each point of views explained all of the emotional, physical, spiritually effects. Both point of views were solid and talked about the same effects that a woman would have. But the point of view of women only thought that abortions are dealing with women and not men. There is where the argument comes in at. The article about the other point of view about the men mentioned that men are excluded when they really should not be. The point of view of ‘’ The Effects of Abortion on men’’ were the best argument, because it talked about both withdrawals of men, women, and the comparison of all the withdrawals. That article had much strength and could really persuade someone that is what the other point of view did not have much of. ‘’The Effects of Abortion’’ had weakness because they only focused on the women and not men. But it was a good point of view if someone wanted to know about the effects of women after abortion. Both point of views helped in…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The opposing argument is that a nine month old fetus is relatively similar to an infant, so if abortion of a nine month old is justified then infanticide is justified (Warren, 342). Therefore if infanticide is considered as a type of murder, then abortion should be considered similarly. But Warren responds that infanticide is in fact different from abortion. First, infanticide would deprive others of parenthood as infants are able to be given to adoption centers/agencies and orphanages. Secondly, unlike an infant, “the unborn fetus, contrary to the wishes of the pregnant woman, violates her rights to freedom, happiness, and self-determination” (Warren, 342). An infant poses no threats to the life of the woman as it no longer resides within her body using it to keep itself alive. Lastly, she concludes that infanticide can be justified under certain conditions and only those where the greater good overrides the death of the infant. An example of this can be seen with the Eskimos; they need more men to go out to salvage food. Therefore if there are more women than men then they have more mouths to feed than bodies to go hunting and infanticide of female infants is permitted otherwise they will die out. Another example would be if the infant is born with such a devastating birth defect, such as trisomy 28, and will otherwise live a painful life thus permitting…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion is murder, and there is no other way to classify it. The author considers that at the very moment of conception, a human life has formed. If this life is ended, for any reason at the direction of another human being, it is wrongful killing of an “innocent… [and]…weak…unborn child…” which could never be justified. Pope John Paul II does not relieve anyone’s responsibility either. All who participate, encourage, and allow the facilitation of abortions are at fault and could be held accountable for murder. Although he uses somewhat of a slippery slope argument here, he makes good use of ethical theories throughout the paper to strengthen his arguments.…

    • 749 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What links the reasons to the conclusion is positivity placed on the motives behind why women should have the right to get an abortion if they desire to. A prescriptive assumption is made, stating how the world should be. A missing link within the article that this author has written is religion’s impact on abortion. Many religions believe that abortion is gravely contrary to the moral law. In general, it’s not one’s actual government law that prohibits abortion, rather than…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abortion is one of the strongest and most controversial rights that is being debated in the world today…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A few more facts would be that since abortions have been legalized there has been around “53 million abortions, so about 1.4 millions per year. Also it mentions that women have 0.6 in 100,000 chance of dying from a legal abortion while the risk of giving birth is 14 times higher. Also that there have been more US state abortion restrictions were enacted between 2011 and 2013 (205 in total) than were adopted during the whole previous decade”(Para. 1) . Which leads into another argument for abortions is giving you a lot of facts connecting women's rights (suffrage) with abortion. She uses women's suffrage and what we have tried to overcome in the past as a platform and a advocacy to connect and mention abortions as one in the same thing. She also mentions that abortion became an infamous symbol that was recognized as an “…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abortion is one of the most controversial topics of all times. The definition most people associate with abortion is the termination of unwanted pregnancy. In their essay, “The Wrong of Abortion”, Patrick Lee and Robert P. George argue that intentional abortion is unjust and therefore objectively immoral no matter the circumstances. Also, they argue that “the burden of carrying the baby is significantly less than the harm the baby would suffer by being killed; the mother and father have a special responsibility to the child; it follows that intentional abortion (even in few cases where the baby’s death is an unintended but foreseen side effect) is unjust ” (24).…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Abortion Debate

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Don Marquis’ paper is a good persuasive work because he is able to argue his strong anti-abortion view point without relying on whether the fetus is a baby or religion. Because he omits those two factors his paper is able to convince a larger proportion of people. Marquis’ conclusion is “Abortion is, except possibly in rare cases, seriously immoral…it is in the same moral category as killing an innocent adult human being. He believes that the issue of the abortion is “whether the fetus is a being whose life it is seriously wrong to end”. He believes that the fetus is such a being and he argues in that favor. Marquis begins his article by showing how the pro-life argument is too broad. According to him pro-lifers base their argument on the fetus being a person. However what is the distinction between a newly fertilized ovum and a cell. He then states that if we follow the argument of a pro-lifer it would be unethical to kill a cancer cell. Next Marquis evaluates the pro-choice argument and deems it too narrow. He claims that under a pro-choicer point of view it doesn’t show that killing infants or a retarded person is wrong. Marquis sees this as a never ending argument because both sides can continue to add their point. He therefore constructs his own argument based on a more general discussion. He examines what makes killing wrong in the first…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays