PCR0025
Critical Thinking
All Foundation
ONLINE NOTES
Topic 3: Argumentation
• Argument is a claim put forward and defended with reasons. • Arguments are composed of: 1. Premises 2. Conclusion
• Statement: A sentence that can sensibly be regarded as either true or false. • 2 things about statements: 1. A sentence may be used to express more than one statement. 2. Not all sentences are statements. 3. Consider the CONTEXT in which particular expression is used.
Identifying Premises and Conclusions
1. Premise indicators • Since, for, seeing that, in view of the fact that, because, given that, being that, as, as indicated by.
2. Conclusion indicators • Therefore, hence, so, it follows that, that is why, wherefore, as a result, suggests that, thus, consequently, accordingly, for this reason, which shows that, implies that, we may infer that, proves that.
• 2 types of arguments: 1. Simple 2. Complex
• 5 types of nonarguments: 1. Reports 2. Unsupported statements of belief and opinion 3. Conditional statements 4. Illustrations 5. Explanations
Reports • To convey information about a subject, not to offer reasons why one statement should be accepted on the basis of others.
Unsupported statements of belief/opinion • No claim that these statements follow from or imply any other statements.
Conditional statements • “if-then” statements.
Illustrations • Intended to provide examples of a claim rather than to prove or support the claim.
Explanations • Try to show why something is the case, not to prove that it is the case.
Evaluating Arguments
• 2 questions: 1. Are the premises true? 2. Can the premises provide “good reasons” for its conclusion?
Are the premises true? • When is it reasonable to accept a premise? • It is true if: 1. it is supported by evidence or 2. it uses Principle of Rational Acceptance.
• Principle of Rational Acceptance: 1. The claim does not conflict with personal experience 2. Does the claim conflict with our background beliefs? 3. Does the claim come from a credible source? • Good reasons to doubt the credibility of a source may incude: 1. The source is not a genuine expert or authority. 2. The source is speaking outside the area of his experience. 3. The source is biased/has motive to lie or mislead. 4. The accuracy of the source’s personal observations @ experiences is doubtful. 5. The source is a media source/internet source that is generally unreliable. 6. The claim made by the source is, in itself, highly implausible @ unlikely.
Can the premise provide `good reasons’ for its conclusion? • 2 kinds of arguments: 1. Deductive (Topic 4) 2. Inductive (Topic 5)
Conclusion • Good Argument is when: 1. All the premises are true 2. The premises provide good reasons to accept the conclusion 3. Meet the standards of critical thinking discussed in Topic 1.
Topic 4: Deductive Arguments
Deductive arguments • Try to prove that their conclusions with rigorous, inescapable logic. • Attempt to show that conclusions must be true given the premises asserted.
Common Patterns of Deductive Reasoning
1. Hypothetical Syllogism Syllogism: A three-line argument, consists of exactly 2 premises and a conclusion. Several types:
a) Modus ponens b) Chain argument c) Modus tollens d) Denying the antecedent e) Affirming the consequent
2. Categorical syllogism 3-line argument in which each statement begins with the word all, some, @ no.
3. Argument by elimination Seeks to logically rule out various possibilities until only a single possibility remains.
4. Argument based on Mathematics The conclusion is certain, not mere likely @ probable.
5. Argument from definition The conclusion is presented as being true by definition.
DEDUCTIVE VALIDITY
Valid deductive argument: Logically reliable deductive argument (the conclusion really does follow necessarily from the premises)
Invalid deductive argument: The conclusion does not follow necessarily from the premises.
Topic 5: Inductive Arguments
Inductive arguments • Simply claim that conclusions are likely @ probable given the premises offered.
Common Patterns of Inductive Reasoning
1. Inductive Generalization An argument in which a generalization is claimed to be probably true based on information about some members of a particular class.
2. Predictive argument A prediction that is defended with reasons.
3. Argument from authority Asserts a claim and then supports that claim by citing some presumed authority @ witness who has said that the claim is true.
4. Causal argument Asserts or denies that something is the cause of something else.
5. Statistical argument Rests on statistical evidence.
6. Argument from Analogy The conclusion is claimed to depend on comparison between 2 @ more things.
INDUCTIVE STRENGTH
Strong inductive argument: Logically reliable inductive argument. The conclusion is probably true if the premises are true.
Weak inductive argument: The conclusion is not probably true even if the premises are true.
|Key differences |
|Deductive |Inductive |
|1. If the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. |1. If the premises are true, then the conclusion is probably |
| |true. |
|2. The conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. |2. The premises follows probably from the premises. |
|3. The premises provide conclusive evidence for the truth of the |3. The premises provide good (but not conclusive) evidence for |
|conclusion. |the truth of the conclusions. |
|4. It is impossible for all the premises to be true and |4. It is unlikely that the premises are true and the conclusion |
|conclusion false. |false. |
|5. It is logically inconsistent to assert the premises and deny |5. Although it is logically consistent to assert the premises and|
|the conclusion (if you accept the premises, then you must accept |deny the conclusion, the conclusion is probably true if the |
|the conclusion.) |premises are true. |
-----------------------
Management and Law Department
(MLD)
-----------------------
[pic]
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
integration. John D. Rockefeller perfected horizontal integration and was very successful with his involvement with oil. J. Pierpont Morgan was considered the Bankers’ Banker and his interlocking directorates with the United States Steel. All three circumvent competition and come from lower middle class. What is impressive about them is that they had little to no education and did not indulge in extravagances.…
- 393 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
or other protocols, to convey an assertion itself, or to communicate about the "subject" of…
- 2032 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
1. When data are read from a text file, you can use the BufferedReader to read one line at a time. After a line of data is read, there is no way of going back to read it again. To overcome this you can first read all the data into a structured object to store them, and then process the data later. Please use the DNA class (we have developed in the past a few weeks, which has properties of ID and seq, and the set/get methods) to develop a Java program to read in a FASTA format DNA sequence file, and parse out each sequence record into the part of ID and sequence. The ID is identified between the ">" and the "|" in the header line, and the sequence is the concatenation of all lines of the sequence part into a single string. Each DNA sequence record can then be stored into an array element of the DNA class. Use a loop in your program to prompt the user to enter a sequence ID, and if the ID exists print out the sequence. If the ID does not exist, print out a warning message. Exit the loop if the user enters “quit”. Please use the sequence file (seq.fasta) as the input file. Below is a sample output of the program: (2 points)…
- 519 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
| In the statement, "You didn't like that restaurant; so you probably don't like to eat out," "you probably don't like to out" is the…
- 553 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Those working against common core implementation cite government control due to the funding provided to school districts and lack of proof that the system works as basic reasons for their conclusions. Those in favor of common core cite better prepared graduating students, a more educated workforce, and standardization amongst students. The article indicated that if districts had to define their own educational standards, they would start by seeking out “common core standards.”…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1. On a sheet of paper, apply the general overview of court structure in the United States (Figure 1.2) to your local community.…
- 435 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“Since more than a million dollars are needed to staff a properly run cruise in the Caribbean, it must be that every employee on board makes more than a million dollars on each cruise!” commits the fallacy of…
- 3709 Words
- 15 Pages
Good Essays -
A research-based paper will rely upon logos, Aristotle's term for an appeal to reason & logic. An argument will also require attention to reason & logic to be credible. A formula for logos in an argument is claim + evidence = credible argument. All factors should be analyzed in a logical manner to add credibility to an academic argument. 2 common types of arguments are Classic & Rogerian. How do the 4 elements of an argument fit into these 2 styles?…
- 932 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Along with his unanswered question, the author fails to present his evidence in any sort of an organized manner. The erratic nature of his evidence is easily jumbled and confused. The…
- 614 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The term used to refer to a reason provided for accepting a claim is premise. Premises…
- 953 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Each premise that is supporting the conclusion in the argument is claimed to be true in every instance. There has always been an order of causes based on the very nature of existence. The order of causes cannot go in a circle has always been true. The fact that the order of causes cannot go on forever has always been the case. The fourth premise in the argument is a conditional statement,claiming that, if premises one, two, and three are true, then it is true that the first cause in the order of causes is what is referred to as God. The conclusion of the fourth premise serves as the fourth premise for the argument.…
- 923 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
* So, what you want to prove must be true – the opposite of where you started.…
- 2859 Words
- 12 Pages
Good Essays -
3 - Meets Standards 2 - Approaching Standards 1 - Below Standards Focus or Thesis The thesis statement is Statement specific, narrow enough as to be practicably defended within the length parameters of the assignment, make an interesting claim, one over which reasonable people might disagree, and provides some hint as to what the main line of argument will be. The thesis statement is specific, narrow enough as to be practicably defended within the length parameters of the assignment, Make an interesting claim, one over which reasonable people might disagree…
- 575 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
of it is inadequate, and further proof is required to evaluate the stated claim. It is important to…
- 477 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Two references cited, but information in the reference may be biased or not directly relevant to your rationale.…
- 2151 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays