Crusades In Different Religion Essay

The ways religious people perceive the crusades in different religion differ from one another. For many Christian the crusades were a force of reconquering the “holy land”. However, for many other people such as Muslims and Jews the crusades were a catastrophic destruction of their beliefs. The crusades during the 11th and 16th for many people had different motives. For people, who were attacked by Christians the crusades meant something very different from the people, who were conquering and killing people on “the name of God”. During these times, people began to feel confuse because they did not know the “real” purpose of the actions of the Christians. On the other hand, Christian felt competent and glorious because they had the power to order and perform on the name of God. In the text by Fulcher of Chartres, one can see how what the crusades signified for the Christian population, and why they perform the way, they did. On the other hand, in text written by Solomon Bar Simson one can experience how the Jews community felt regarding the crusades. In addition, one can see how these texts have differences when describing the reasons behind and why the crusades happened.

In the text written by Fulcher of Chartres, one can assume that the reason why
Particularly Solomon’s position shows a distinctive version of what the crusades were. Mostly throughout history, the crusades are portrait as religious war by the Christians even though that is the true; Solomon’s point of view shows a different perspective on the crusades. One can assume that both of these perspectives diverse from each other. However, Solomon’s side of the crusades complement much more with the experiences that the people, who were conquered and mistreated by the Christians went