By this, it does seem that finding Saul's identity
was the main aim of narrator's journey. The last text justifies the need to write the story about the storytellers after judging all the relevant sides attached to Saul's story.
Another character who plays an important role in both texts is Manuelito or Hastiin Ch’il Hajin (Man of Black Weeds), a Navajo born in 1818, son-in-law of the famous leader Narbona. Both the Americans and the Navajos looked at Manuelito as a leader through the period of the long walk (Denetdale 52). Denetdale focuses on Manuelito in a chapter entitled “A Biographical Account of Manuelito: Noble Savage, Patriotic Warrior, and American Citizen.” Her attention is directed at the multiplicity of views of Manuelito in established American history, Navajo oral history, and the popular discourse. Denetdale includes Navajo stories of Manuelito from his son, Bob Manuelito or Naaltsoos Neiyéhí, and Herrera, a Navajo chief at Bosque Redondo, highlighting…
Born Malintzin, Malinche as she came to be known, was a native interpreter to conquistador Hernando Cortés. Born a native Nahua speaker, supposedly of noble status, Malinche was sold into slavery around 1510 to a noble family in Tabasco on the Mexican Gulf Coast where she learned to speak Maya, the language of her masters. In 1519, when a group of Spanish conquistadors lead by Hernando Cortés, conquered Tabasco the Malinche was given to the foreigner’s as a peace offering. The Spaniards’ Maya interpreter discovered that Malinche knew Nahuatl and was therefore useful to Cortés in helping him converse with native Nahuatl speakers. In time Malinche learned Castilian, serving as Cortés’ translator she helped the conquistador gain allies in his…
Schwartz fills in that general background with a collection of documents that illustrate the clash of two cultures and how this conflict created a new environment for the Nahua and the Spanish, for other Native Americans and other Europeans. Both the Spanish and the Mexica were "renaissance conquerors" and strongly religious, and Victors and Vanquished reveals the shared complexity, violence, pride, and prejudice of these seemingly different societies and…
Orozco was, as an artist who chose "political commitment" such as Hidalgo, are themes that reflect change, tormented force and original expertise, tragedy and heroism that explain the Mexican history as well as defines a remarkable penetration that captures cultural or ethnic montage of portraits to his country.…
De Las Casas ' major emphasis for writing this book was obviously to persuade the King to out law the Spanish from destroying the Indians and his remarkably vivid description of the brutality used by the Spanish is very motivating for the reader to become emotionally involved. While its message is diluted by repetition and exaggeration the initiative for someone of that time to write something for the benefit of people who were not even considered worthy of acknowledgement is what makes this book worth reading. However, the tone of this "personal account" sounds more like a persuasive essay than a factual description of events. Not only do most of his eye-witness accounts seem highly…
When in reality it was the Spaniards who were the true savages for treating Native Americans as an evil creature due to their religious views. It was sad to read about how Indians families were torn apart and many choose not to have kids because of this. I was disgusted by how the Spaniards would cut off native women’s breasts and throw their infants to a pack of dogs. The teachings of Popes prepared the ground for the mass Genocide of Native Americans because they taught genocide because anyone who would go against their God would be killed. There are many major statements in this book. One of which is the statement that history books have incorrect information on the conquest of the Americas by the Spaniards. This is important to understand because it shows how young students are being taught wrong information as well as being taught to think that Native Americans are horrible people when the reality was that they were the victims in the situation. Another important statement addressed in the book was how it explained the mistreatment of Native American by the…
“From the fact that the Indians are barbarians it does not necessarily follow that they are incapable…” (de Las Casas 3). In For the Record, it starts off right away in this section of how the Europeans while not sure of what to make of the Indians they knew that these were not the savages as some had described. De Las Casas goes on to describe of a people that were both loyal and committed to the community and to their fellow man. De Las Casas main adversary, Gines Sepulveda, failed to see the parallel in the fate of the Spaniards at the hands of the Romans and Caesar Augustus. “Now see how he called the Spanish people barbaric and wild” (de Las Casas 3) demonstrates the same philosophy of the thoughts of Europeans as they encountered the Indians. Shall those that are fearful for the loss of all they have worked for not fight back and retain what is rightfully theirs. The Indians, especially the Aztecs had built cities, established political and economic organizations and created richly diverse civilizations. In The Jesuit Relations they recount the gratitude shown to the hospital nuns “The Savages who leave the hospital, and who come to see us again at St. Joseph, or at the three Rivers,…
Las Casas’ account depicts the terrible and inhumane actions that the Spaniards inflicted upon the indigenous people. He made it very clear that the indigenous people were far from deserving of this torturous treatment. He describes them as “among the purest, the most innocent, and the most intelligent.” (p.9) Las Casas points out that other Spaniards had similar feelings for the indigenous people. Some of the Spaniards described them as “the most blessed on Earth.” (p.9) After Las Casas established the fact that the indigenous people were far from deserving of the treatment they received due to their innocence, he described of how horrific the torture methods were. When describing how the Spaniards treated the indigenous people he says, “they treated them worse than beasts, with less regard than one treats a pile of manure in the road” (p.11) Las Casas makes it very evident that the Spaniards had no regard for the indigenous people and went to extreme measures to torture them.…
Cabeza de Vaca, on the other hand, asserts this “retelling” or opinion that he gives on the natives that he encountered as his duty to relay, so that others who seek to join his cause in expedition can learn or even draw their own conclusions. This difference in “perception”, so to speak, is what makes up the core difference in values that both of these writers display and what effect it has on their works. Sahagun’s research style of using a survey-type system to “interview” all roles of society in Aztec life shows his priorities are skewed towards primary sources instead of personal opinion. Sahagun also allows the reader to draw their own conclusions on what responses should be valued highly compared to other responses from different sects of society. To contrast the writing styles of Sahagun and Cabeza de Vaca, we can clearly see that while Cabeza de Vaca morphs his encounters into a “story” that is much more oriented towards specific reader (the king), Sahagun presents facts in a clear manner that not only includes input from the Natives themselves, but allows the reader to make their own conclusions on the subject.…
Mayan culture gender means that women were to work in their homes mostly providing food and clothes for their family. If necessary they were allowed to come and help bring in the harvest. Women were not allowed to hunt, only able to clean and serve the food, such as deer. Women weren’t allowed to hunt deer only men did that. So after the women cleaned and prepared the food the men would eat first and the women would wait until the men finished to have their women only dinner. Gender as a whole relates to the Mayan Culture because they are influenced by the man but dependent on the women to cook, clean and take care of the children and also make some money in the process. Also some of their beliefs are that men should do all of the outside work…
In “Only Daughter” Sandra Cisneros shows her first hand experience as an Mexican-American women, and how she is seen in her family. Cisneros explains how her family wanted her to adopt the typical women roles in society even though Cisneros did not want that for herself at all. Cisneros emphasizes her points by using metaphors “ But somehow I could feel myself being erased”. By using this Cisneros emphasized her feelings by using a metaphor. This shows that as her father would continuously say I have 7 sons, not 6 son and 1 daughter Cisneros felt as if she was being erased out of his life. Yet instead of saying I felt I was being pushed away, using “erased” showed that it hurt her to the point that she possibly did not want to just say it, but she wanted to show it. By having Cisneros used metaphors to show her feelings it can make the reader feel as if they are Cisneros and is feeling the same way as she is. By her feeling she’s “ being erased” it shows that just by her father making a simple translation mistake it hurt he so much. By her father doing this it was like her was taking away her identity away.…
Social Structure: What were the calpulli? What were the major classes of Aztec society? How did clothing reflect a person's class? Which was the largest class? Which was the smallest? Describe the lifestyle of the ruler.…
1. Three arguments’ that Juan Gines de Sepulveda used to justify enslaving the Native Americans were for gold, ore deposits, and for God’s sake and man’s faith in him. 2. Three arguments that Bartolome de las Casas gave in attacking Spanish clonial policies in the New World were the Indians eating human flesh, worshiping false gods, and also, he believed that the Indians were cowardly and timid. 3. For comparisons that Sepulveda used, in lines 1-7, to express the inferiority of the Indians was their prudence, skill virtues, and humanity were inferior to the Spanish as children to adults, or even apes to men. Comparisons he used to dismiss the significance of the Indians “Ingenuity for various works of artisanship” were the animals, birds, and spiders that could make things humans could not replicate. In either situation, there was no appropriateness. 4. Las Casas may have weekened his case by requiring that the Spanish must restore what had been taken unjustly from the Indians because the Spanish ultimately modernized them and if they were given back what had been taken, they would again become ‘retro’. If the Indians had been given back their bow and arrows, then they would have no use for them because they have guns. 5. The bias that Las Casas expressed in the last paragraph in his book was that Muslims are savages.…
Centuries ago, there existed a religion, one with no true name, human sacrifices, games where participants are highly likely to die, and Gods found in almost every aspect of daily life. This was the ancient Mayan religion. Although some beliefs, values, and minor traditions are still upheld by followers today, for the most part this religion has completely vanished along with the ancient mayan civilization. This may be for good reason, as some of the practices were barbarous and bordering on pure insanity. Through the madness, there were three very important aspects of this religion that guided the mayans;…
Proposal: This research paper will discuss how the narrator, who is Native American, of the story deals with the stereotypes from people of society. It is a main issue throughout the story but the narrator has ways to quiet down his true emotions about it. How the narrator deals with the stereotyping is not something that the reader would really catch onto because of the slick reactions the narrator has. It will shed light on what the narrator truly feels towards all of the stereotyping and it will show why.…