Cunningham's Ultra-Darwinism: Why Did Darwin Kill God

Within Did Darwin Kill God?, Cunningham dissects how the ultra-Darwinist and Creationist argument that Christianity and evolution are incompatible topics renders the two systems of belief self-contradictory (and therefore self-destructive). The incompatibility perceived by each group would make it seem that Darwinism killed God, however, Cunningham reinforces the idea that Christianity and Darwinism can coexist. In this, Cunningham appeals to both extremes, building an argument that Darwinism did not, in fact, kill God through use of religious and scientific knowledge to appeal to each group. Cunningham takes on the task of breaking down these extreme belief systems in an extremely skillful manner. He appeals to the angle of each group–using scientific reasoning to critique
It would seem he has disproven God and the validity of the Christian religion. Though, that certainly seems extreme. How can one scientific theory disprove religion, a cornerstone of human society for millennia, in one fell swoop? Certainly Christian folks should not all drop their moral frameworks, forsake the Lord, and dedicate themselves to a lifetime of meaningless pessimism. The answer to the ultra-Darwinist shutdown of Christianity is made clear by Cunningham, which he proves through scientific knowledge. Ultimately, just as religion has no universal authority over science, science has no universal authority over religion. Ultra-Darwinists claim that God is dead, but science cannot prove that. In an interview with Cunningham, atheist, Darwinist and philosopher Michael Ruse explains the concept: “If one goes into the lab, or one goes out into the field to do science, one is, as a scientist, not looking for God. And therefore one should not be surprised, disappointed, or pleased when one does not find God. I don’t think science proves the existence of God, I don’t think science proves the non-existence of