My opinion leads more to the majority of the case because sometimes minors do not mean to be in public places after curfew. There can be many situations in which the minor was at a friend’s house and time slipped away and he or she had to walk back home. This does not necessarily mean that the minor was engaging in possible criminal activities and it does not call for punishment from the police. Although the dissenting opinion justifies the law to be of the public interest, it focuses more on minors possibly engaging in criminal activity at late hours and restricts minors from their…
Democratic values are the fundamental beliefs that founded the United States and represent the core of America. Throughout history, many reform movements sought to expand these strong values that represent the unity among Americans through “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” The magnification of these principles can be especially seen through the time period of 1825-1850, where much change was beginning to occur. While all of these reforms sought to expand the democratic ideals, only certain movements succeeded and presented the deserved freedom of rights to all. Movements involving religion, juvenile institutions, and women’s rights supported and expanded upon these ideals while other aspects such as temperance and utopianism failed to offer the true meaning.…
To many teens and young adults, curfew laws have negatively affected their lives and their viewpoints of the criminal justice system. In the essay “Curfew Laws: Demonizing Teens,” written by Nora Gold, Gold illustrates why curfew laws are bad in the U.S. and all they do is punish the teens that do not need to be punished. The main points that Gold gives to help back up her theory that curfew laws are bad are that curfews on teens take away some of their civil rights, curfews don’t actually reduce the crimes committed by teens, politicians propose curfew laws so it seems like they are being tough on crime, and also that there are other ways that will help reduce the crime among teens. One of which being after school…
2. Curfew Issue: Enforced. The Supreme Courts have ruled in favor of curfew for minors.…
If the opportunity to make some difference in the community presents itself, would you not have the desire to? Particularly when it concerns the wellbeing of not only adolescents, but all citizens in the community. Even if you do not have kids, all of us can relate because we were all kids once. The idea that kids under the age of eighteen ought to be free to roam the streets after 10 p.m. is faulty as it fails to protect everyone. A curfew for adolescents will bring them valuable boundaries which can transfer into other areas of their lives. Some may have no boundaries or discipline at home and at least they will learn to respect this…
A curfew would create a safer life for teenagers who may fail to realize the risk of being outside at night. Most people know the consequences of becoming tired. Being sleep deprived leads to irrational decisions and loss of motor skills. Allowing teenagers to stay out later would increase the risk of poor decisions being made. These decisions could include illegal behavior but also poor social decisions like saying something you wish you could take back. Drowsiness while driving could prove fatal for a teenage driver and any surrounding people due to decreased reaction time. This also does not only effect teenagers when they are driving but also when they are a pedestrian. It has been proven that driving while tired is just as bad as driving intoxicated. Being out later only increases the risks of being in an automobile accident for young drivers or pedestrians. The additional issue of teenage drivers and pedestrians being out at night is visibility. For young drivers, their inexperience and delayed reaction time is only more greatly hindered when it is dark outside. The inability to see pedestrians and large animals, such as deer, in time will be much higher if no curfew is enforced. This could pose a safety threat to the driver as well as people…
Many cities in the state of Arizona have put a curfew on all kids. Kids under the age of 16 cannot be out unsupervised between 10 pm and 5 am. Kids 16-18 cannot be out during 12 am to 5 am. Our country is a free country and allows parents to control their own kids how they choose. Who is to tell a parent how to raise their kid? The government should not be allowed to bully parents and give them rules for their own kids. These curfews are not allowing parents to control their kids to their liking. Many people feel curfews hurt teens rights, are unconstitutional and ineffective. Studies show that curfew do not lower the crimes that teenagers commit. Curfews hamper the teen’s right for free speech by not letting them congregate at certain hours. They go against what America was built for - religious, political and economic freedom for all. . The 1st amendment states the right of the people peaceably to assemble. This amendment is broken by having a curfew. Many people believe curfews stop the crime rate in juveniles. However if a teenager is going to break laws what is to stop them from breaking the curfew law along with it? A curfew does nothing but restrict law-abiding citizens. The curfew law is the easiest law for teens to break, on purpose or on accident. Sometimes things such as car accidents happen, causing traffic. This later causes a teen to be late for curfew, and are caught and charged as juveniles for something that was not even their fault. Curfews are just setting teens up to be charged as juvenile delinquents. Anything that can be done during curfew can be done after and before curfew. This law is just keeping teens away for a few hours until curfew is up and they go do drugs, drink, etc… Thus there is no point to a curfew. When a child is at home during curfew they will become bored and try and figure out ways to be entertained. Some may include breaking curfew or getting high or drunk. The more teens are bored…
Confidentiality is central to trust between doctors, medical team and patients. Patients have a right to expect that information about them will be held in confidence. The birth of the Hippocratic Oath in the fourth century started the responsibility of physicians to preserve the privacy and confidentiality of their patients. One of the provisions of the Oath lays the ethical foundation for the physician’s duty of confidentiality even beyond the circumstances of medical care. The Florence Nightingale Pledge, which was composed in 1893, was a modification of the “Hippocratic Oath,” a statement of the ethics and principles of the nursing profession. Included in the pledge is to hold in confidence all personal matters. Today we have the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which was passed by Congress in 1996. One of the regulations requires protection and confidential handling of protected health information. We also have the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) who takes an active role against potential violations in patient confidentiality (Oram M., 2008). This paper will consider the ethical implication of a breach of confidentiality with ethical principles. An alternative will be to address the dilemma in a clinical setting. Lastly, the author will address how an ethics committee might approach the dilemma using ethical principles, theories, and a team effort to ethical decision-making.…
Curfews are a subject that is widely discussed on if they should or should not be enforced most of the people lean to enforce curfews in an effort to cut crimes that are happening late at night. Most parents would agree that teen curfew is effective in reducing the risk of teens getting into trouble. But I believe that teens shouldn’t have a curfew. I say this because not all teens are out in weird hours of the night getting into trouble so why punish all teens for others mistakes.…
This paper will discuss the offence status and then discussing the perspective of a police officer that is on routine patrol that encounters what appears to be three underage individuals that is in violation of the city ordinance regarding curfew. The officer will provide a list of offenses that each underage individual violated. The officer will classify how each will be treated and why the officer made that decision. Furthermore, the officer will discuss how it might handle an uncooperative underage individual and how to proceed in the status of offense. Also, difficult parents that refuse to pic their child up from the scene at the affect this have in the handling of the case.…
Last weekend, the curfew kept one of my friends from driving under the influence of alcohol. It also kept one of my friends from driving after a long and tiresome day. Driving white under the influence of alcohol or fatigue will greatly impair your driving abilities, and the curfew effectively kept my friends from being unsafe on the roads after midnight. Another example that was in the news recently that supports why a curfew is necessary is the death of a boy named Wilberto in the town that neighbors mine. The officers in this town don't necessarily enforce the curfew law, and a freshman boy's life was taken because of it. He left his home illegally (he didn't have his license) to drive with his girlfriend around 1 a.m. While he was driving, he became distracted and spun off the road, killing himself and seriously injuring his girlfriend. If the curfew law had been enforced more strictly in that town, Wilberto's chances of getting killed or hurt would have been much slimmer. An argument against a curfew might be that teens have the right to be on the road at any time they would like, and that a curfew law is imposing on their freedoms as human beings and citizens…
Curfews unfairly confine all young teens based on the actions of a small percentage of their population. Not only are mandatory curfews unfair to law-abiding minors in attempting to reduce crime, but they have actually led to…
Many children under the age of 15 are immature and although age does not define maturity, the lack of life experiences can. Many children think that they are old enough to go out and stay late forgetting that they are still children and have many other years to experience life. A child can sometimes not be as wise as an older person. When they are out with their friends they can do things that could get them into trouble and all because they thought it would be fun. A child under the age of 16 should have a curfew. A curfew can help children learn that sleep is essential, they can learn about responsibility, and it could keep children safe.…
Within the United States there exists a law which protects teens nationwide known as the state curfew act. The state curfew act is a law that was put in place to stop teens from going out late at night and getting in trouble. The law makes it illegal for teens to be out past a set time. This law is highly debated upon by many teens and some adults as to whether it is needed or is just an unnecessary law that infringes upon the teenagers right to freedom. Of course the law does exist for a clear purpose which in most cases it fulfills and prevents many casualties and crimes. I have wrote this paper in order to hopefully shed some light on the validity of the law by sharing some statistics such as the crime rates passed certain times as well…
There is a bad thing about having the parents decide the curfew that it would some parents would decide that they can stay out but they have to come home. That would be dangerous but some parents are strict, so they would not allow that to happen. This will be much better because the parents know what's best for their own and would not be careless about it. To let the parents decide the curfew is way much better.…