2) General Motors has many
2) General Motors has many
4. Corporations repeatedly claim that cutting jobs will allow them to save money and stay in business. Why does this not seem to work much in the examples detailed in the film?…
By November 2008, Chrysler’s sales had shrunk 25%. GM posted losses of $18 billion, and Ford lost $11.5 billion. Despite Ford’s elimination of 1/3 of its workforce, GM’s elimination of 30,000 jobs, and Chrysler’s cutting of 13,000 employees, the Big Three were on the brink of bankruptcy. All three testified before both houses of congress asking for loans to avoid default. The Big Three stated their demise would trigger 3 million layoffs within a year, plunging the economy further into recession.…
Why GM Matters is a book written about the history of General Motors Company and the struggle they endured during the 2008 economic recession. The book is broken into three parts; the first part explains what went wrong with General Motors Company including the workers that would be affected if General Motors Company had to move their production to another country or if they had to close the doors on General Motors Company and let Toyota buy them out. The book also discusses in the first part, the person most people consider responsible for their struggle throughout the recession, Rick Wagoner. The author in the first part conducted many interviews with General Motors Company employees such as, works that worked in the production plant, workers that handled the finances, but most notably, Rick Wagoner. The majority of the first part is about the history of General Motors Company and the consequences that would occur if General Motors was bought out by Toyota.…
The main issue that caused all these layoffs to be done was the fact that the company did not seem to have a growth plan in action to help control and streamline the process. According to a plant manager, “Staffing was done sloppily, so we ended up with a lot of fat”. Carter tried to adjust his departments through demotions to trim the fat, but was denied.…
Layoffs create uncertainty in the workforce causing loss of productivity in remaining the remaining workforce. The article addresses that a manager's approach is paramount; we don't disagree with this sentiment, but I don't see it as a large of an issue as the author of the article. If a company is at a point where they are laying off employees, all other options should have been exhausted. The author writes the article from the position that managers don't know how manage and that layoff are ineffective. I agree layoffs are not useful, but an amount of…
GM’s vision and main focus is to achieve a healthier margin and profit. Although this vision may not be very easy to attain, is a very realistic one. In spite of the fact that it seemed to be a “once-unthinkable” goal, GM reported its highest-ever net income of about $8 billion in 2011. This was a massive increase from the previous year’s net income of $4.7 billion, and was in accordance with its vision of achieving higher profit. A short while after that, GM also released figures of its global sales, which showed its reclaim of the ‘world's largest auto maker’ title from its rival, Toyota. Based on these facts, I…
Problem Identification and formulation will be reviewed using the team discussion from Week 2. The paper will: Summarize the issue; Identify the problem; Explain why it is the underlying problem; Reflect on the group collaboration process in defining the problem; and Explain how a clearly defined problem could help to find the solutions.…
In the first 7 chapters of Car Guys vs Bean Counters, it is easy to see why the production line and accounting/financing have disagreements regarding the primary purpose of the company. A considerably large reason for General Motors downfall seems to be the focus they had on the numbers they had to arrive at to generate a large profit. All GM was aiming to do was to do anything to maximize profits without a focus on the quality of the product. The issue of not keeping themselves grounded arose from this very own mindset. Repeatedly, Mr. Lutz pointed out that the “number crunchers” failed constantly and that the focus should be on what matters in the end, the product the customer is receiving and their perception on the quality of the product…
General Motors observed changes warily in the 1990s as the internet was determined to change the automotive industry. GM was the largest vehicle manufacturer in the world, with revenue of $18.5 billion dollars, production facilities located in 32 countries and a workforce involving 325,000 employees. Despite the companies size and power, GM had witnessed their global market share grind down from 17.7 percent in the early 1990s to 15 percent in 2002 due to the declining levels of customer satisfaction and competition from foreign imports. GM had to accept that the industry had changed (Cohen & Shoshanah, 2005).…
GM and Chrysler’s management also failed to anticipate the rise of energy prices. Gas prices skyrocketed to almost four dollars a gallon and with the fragile state of the economy, it made people very conservative about their driving. The rise of gas prices was almost like a death sentence to Chrysler and GM. They have relied on the sales of sport utility vehicles or SUVs as their main source of income. The sport utility vehicles carry an already high price tag and when you add the gas prices you get vehicles that nobody wants to purchase. People wanted to get rid of their SUVs because they just cost too…
In conclusion I agree with many of the aspects Equality presented. General Motors was already given assistance; they need to be given the chance and motivation to try to rescue themselves. In history it’s been proven that the economy will right itself, government involvement has a tendency to make the situation worse.…
In Joseph Gilbert 's article titled "Sorrow and Guilt: An Ethical Analysis of Layoffs" a more philosophical approach to the ethicality of downsizing is brought forward. Gilbert first addresses the several view points from which downsizing can be looked upon. First, for the stock market, downsizing is usually a good thing because the cut costs will often result in rising stock prices. Second, from top management 's point of view, downsizing can be good because it is an easy way of dealing with a serious problem of declining profits. Thirdly, for middle and lower management downsizing is bad news. These are the managers often assigned with the task of doing the actual firing which causes them some feelings of sorrow or guilt. Finally, the terminated employees are obviously going to be disgruntled, shocked, and quite…
Why GM Matters is a book written about the history of General Motors Company and the struggle they endured during the 2008 economic recession. The book is broken in three parts; the first part explains what went wrong in General Motors Company including the workers that would be affected if General Motors Company had to move their production to another country or if they had to close the doors on General Motors Company and let Toyota buy them out. The book also discusses in the first part, the person most people consider responsible for their struggle throughout the recession, Rick Wagoner. The author in the first part conducted many interviews with General Motors Company employees such as, works that worked in the production plant, workers…
Following his analysis, Professor Gilbert makes a deduction that, in cases where downsizing is being used by a corporation or an organization to help it remain in business, otherwise, it goes under, and then it can be considered morally right and consequently ethical corporate behavior. Subsequently, in his use of utilitarian approach which argues that the determination of whether an action is morally right or wrong is entirely dependent on its consequences, downsizing can be considered moral and thus ethical because they result in greatest utility for a large number of people. Further, the rights and duties approach contents that it is moral to downsize since employees lack absolute rights to their jobs. Nevertheless, the counter argument to ethicality to this is that these same employees still command a right of fair and just treatment. In conclusion, the justice and fairness approach finds downsizing to be immoral. This is because of lack of proportionality an employee`s behavior and the action of termination their duty.…
All of these issues then culminated into a huge issue with transfer of knowledge. As transfer started to happen the decrease in absenteeism and grievances significantly dropped early on. It is important to note that the workers from the original GM plant prior to the merger were rehired. This caused an even bigger obstacle due to their previous attitudes about their job. Knowledge transfer was very slow if at all in the beginning. From 1986 to 1990 it was slow but by late 1990 workers attitudes and transfer of knowledge began to increase. This was evident in workers satisfaction surveys. Management found by late 1990 that the learning wasn’t finite like they initially thought, but would be continuous over time.…