I strongly agree to the idea of the authorities monitoring what is happening on social media’s such as MSN chats, Facebook profiles, Twitter, and other social websites being used.
One very big reason that makes me agree with the authority’s monitoring our social media sites is because it is very likely for them to possibly stop a crime from taking place. I’m very sure that some people’s privacy is most valued to them and every citizen demands the right to privacy. Although one thing I don’t understand is why people would have a problem with not getting privacy on social websites when it is very clear that they shouldn’t be posting anything so secretive in the first place. Either you are going to post something that you don’t have to hide or you are going to keep it to yourself because you don’t want anyone else to know. That’s a win-win situation. If you were to post something on Twitter no matter how secretive, it is possible that anyone can see it. Everyone knows that a friend, enemy, or even a complete stranger could view it, which is why I don’t see a problem with the authorities seeing it either.
Secondly, it is very true that a person could become paranoid. They may get the idea and start thinking by saying “if the authorities are able to see everything I am doing on my Twitter, they may also be able to track me down and watch my every little move.” This could possibly get some people scared for a while but one positive thing about this is that people will be more free and willing to go outside and just have a good time away from the internet. If they really do think someone is watching them they may want to show that “creepy secret spy” that they are innocent and they have nothing to hide by just having a good time outside with their friends giving that imaginary spy the idea to leave them alone.
Lastly, I have certain friends who always get into drama on social websites such as Twitter or Facebook but most of the time it is because they were dragged into something that was a complete lie to trap them. People are always starting rumours on the internet, and the ones who are the most deceiving are the quiet and shy type people. This could be bad because the one who looks shy and quiet could get away with things if they were to make up a convincible lie for the people monitoring them. Their quiet act would play along with the act while the person who had nothing to do with anything could get into deep trouble just because of judgemental minds. A lot of people now a day also display false info or certain code phrases that only selected people would understand. It is like saying “Let’s go to the party” most people would think they are talking about attending a party but in real life they mean “We’ll pick a fight with Bob on the day of the party”. It’s like saying one thing and meaning another which would only be understood by certain people. Being monitored by authorities could help with this situation because one little key phrased could be used as evidence when something does happen. There would be proof that whoever denies the fact that they hurt Bob on Saturday had posted this so and so phrase on Friday night, hinting all their friends that Friday is the day Bob will be victimized as revenge. If the hint or signal is caught beforehand by the authorities, an innocent person could also be saved.
These are all the reasons why I think authorities should monitor all social sites. Yes, there may be some cons but there are also a great number of pros to be realized which could really help a person out. Pros | Cons | * They can try to stop a crime from happening | * No privacy for some people | * See is a person is doing something threatening | * People may start to sneak around | * Have a life outside of the internet world | * Could make someone really paranoid | * Could be used as evidence for future reference | * Someone may display false information | * Ability to save an innocent person from harm | * Judgements could be wrong due to past habits | * People with bad intentions would get caught | * Some citizens believe they have the right to demand for their privacy |
Cyber Crimes Pro and Con Chart
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
On the last years of Rome, the Roman Empire faced many problems. The Romans suffered from inflation, unemployment, and barbarian invasion. Inflation was the rise in prices of food and water. Since the food and water was so expensive, the poor couldn’t buy it so they died or had hard times living without food. Unemployment was a big problem in the Roman Empire. Most of the poor and farmers did not have any jobs so they over crowded the cities, overcrowding of the cities was bad for the rich and the poor. The barbarian invasion was horrible, since they burned roman houses and killed many of the citizens. The barbarians were Germanic tribes that invaded Rome to destroy their land. The Roman had many accomplishments during their time. Many of the accomplishment were making concrete, creating aqueducts, having a good government, created the column, and having indoor plumbing. The concrete was to build roads, buildings, and vaults. We use concrete to build most stuff today too. Romans also had aqueducts that brought clean and fresh water to the cities. Today we use aqueducts to hold water. They also had a very stable government. Thru Roman Republic was very good, they also had judges who judged fairly. The Romans also had columns that hold their buildings up. On the columns the Romans usually carved pictures on it. Indoor plumbing was also one of the Romans accomplishments. The Romans waste goes through the sewers and in to the Tiber River. Today the Roman Empire influences our community with their building with concrete, there buildings, and the construction of aqueduct. Today we use concrete to build most of our buildings, walls and some roads, but most of our roads today are made out of asphalt. The Roman buildings were very prestigious designs. Today we use most of the Roman designs to build pure materials. We mostly use their designs on buildings. Today we use an aqueduct to preserve our water. We also use it to keep animals in too, or to keep…
- 346 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This makes us more prone to hacker attacks, identity thefts, and privacy right violations. A person might enjoy getting information on websites, and increasing their security on privacy. The reality is that the NSA is the one creating the same software’s meant to protect our privacy. Therefore is it not easy for them to decode these same software’s meant to keep us safe. It is true that terrorists use websites and Tele-Communication to recruit and attack, but does that make it right for government agencies to abuse the Patriot Act, and the Fourth Amendment? Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, High-five, and other forms of social networks privacy terms are virtually non existent. “Facebook and other networks do agree that on their privacy terms to use your information for marketing and Intelligence gathering purposes” Erick Montero. This means that if a certain company wanted to find out how many people like its products, movies, shows or other things, Facebook would allow it to have access to it, for certain amount cash. So the next time you click I agree, make sure to deeply think about it. Our Fourth Amendment gives us the right to not accept unlawful search seizers and in an extent the right to privacy in a persons own car, home, or property. This Amendment is no longer in existence with the rise of police brutality, backed by the city the work for. “So long as you are seen as a threat, the fourth doesn’t apply to you” Erick…
- 1646 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
In today’s society, technology has made countless advances skyrocketing towards the future. Thus the arguments about whether or not security is needed for this amount of power. There are many good aspects of the internet; including social media, messaging, games, and even dating. But, with these things, comes bad that we don't know much about; including catfishing, tracking, and also spying. With the click a button, everything done online can be seen by anyone.…
- 974 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Policies and features on social networking sites are evolving rapidly. Social networking is not a modern concept, for people have been trying to share information since the Stone Age. However they lacked the technology of the present, but as technology and social networking evolved, privacy resisted extinction. As networking sites evolve more features will be implemented to aide control over information. The government has created and is developing new policies that govern social networking sites.…
- 470 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I think there should be limitations of what people can post without getting in trouble. When the government is looking for terrorists or other criminals by social media, they should be able to read things that are posted or sent if it suggests criminal activity. But they shouldn’t allow private businesses do it like Yahoo.com reading people’s Emails. It should be a government activity so there is a less chance of bias results. If the government can stop many bad things from happening just…
- 537 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I don’t have to define to you what social media is, we all use it on a daily basis. If I was speaking to an older audience I may have to explain, but to be honest most of you are going to go home and log onto Facebook. It has always been a part of our world and it probably always will be. Sadly, one part of social media that we are very aware of is that it is often used to harm, to hurt – this is clearly evident in the numerous accounts of cyber bullying. I do not intend to pretend that there aren’t negative aspects of social media; I am simply trying to emphasise the enormous power and influence that it holds. If we could harness this power and rather use it to protect and assist in law enforcement the advantages would be tremendous.…
- 1258 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Many people around the world use social media sites. However, many do not realize that governments are able to use surveillance programs to spy on them. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, surveillance is the close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal and it can be defined as processes of information collection and processing. Surveillance on social media has its positives and negatives and people should know how to use it responsibly, critically and effectively. Surveillance programs endanger the privacy of each Internet user. The reason that surveillance is accepted is because it can help governments find terrorists and can help solve crimes. However, it is a concern for multiple people that there is no law or regulation on how governments are able to use the programs. Moreover, the surveillance programs are sold off the shelf to governments so…
- 1321 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The information social networking users put on their accounts is their choice. However, the government surveillance cameras, public Wi-Fi’s, and internet cookies are out of our control. We just have to choose the right time and place to send or receive private information. I hope there are improvements on making public Wi-Fi’s, and internet cookies…
- 1379 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Twitter and Facebook are only two of the online connections people use today to stay in contact with friends and family. The internet is a place to interact with new people and a way to be exposed to strangers. The partial anonymity available online can be used as a mask for sexual offenders and psychos; they can appear to be ordinary normal people, and you have no way of really knowing what is the truth and what is a lie. Too much personal information is at risk on these social networking sites. You can 't really build a relationship with an online friend because on the internet…
- 1322 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The concept of living in a surveillance society with no fear as long as individuals have nothing to hide sounds ideal; but even if people are not guilty of committing a crime, there are a number of reasons why loss of privacy should concern them. A significant concern is that the…
- 1755 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
As a result, more people are using electronic devices to access social networking sites, to date, their bank accounts, their email, to shop, etc. While these people are using these sites, criminals are taking advantage of this vast amount of information people are putting on the social networking websites. Which is why law enforcement must alter their policing strategies and techniques and use the same source (social networking) to capture these criminals.…
- 723 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Social media is new tool for law enforcement that has proven instrumental in community oriented policing. As times and technology advance, police need to keep up to maintain the edge against criminals. The internet, social media in particular, is a relatively new occurrence, and how to most effectively utilize it as a crime fighting tool has probably not even been realized yet. Criminals are not known to be the brightest bunch, and there are new stories every day of some knucklehead posting incriminating evidence online and getting arrested for it. If information is made public via social media, then there is no expectation of privacy and it can be used against you. Social media is allowing law enforcement to connect with their communities in new and exciting ways, giving officers a face and bringing them closer to the community.…
- 810 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Whenever we surf on the web we disseminate a large amount of information that could be used for different purposes. Contrary to what you might believe, this information is very precious for private businesses and government agencies. The first group uses them mainly for commercial analysis; the second for monitoring and surveillance. http://resources.infosecinstitute.com/concerns-on-social-media-monitoring/…
- 669 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The threat is very real that they become big brother like. Where they start to check everyone’s post and pictures. Or that they will make it so that all things put on social media is put throw them like for example if you were to post something on face book saying how you hat something or someone and you post it before it goes online law informant see it and they could take it down. People could also become afraid to post anything one the internet. For example is someone posts something again to face book they will because so paranoid to post anything. Or if they do they will either edit it so much and clean it up so much that it will no longer get is original point across. Or if it is a photo it either will never get posted or it will be edited so much that you will not be able to tell what the pic was to begin with. They could also not post at all and a lot of people use social Media as an out let for their anger and…
- 872 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Americans are divided in their concerns about government surveillance of digital communications. In a survey 17% of Americans are very concerned about government surveillance, 35% is somewhat concerned, 33% are not very concerned, and 13% are not at all concerned with government surveillance. When asked about more specific concerns some people expressed lower concerns. 39% of Americans are very or somewhat concerned about the government monitoring of their activity on search engines, 38% concerned with the monitoring of email messages, 37% with activity on their cellphone, 29% with mobile apps, and 31% concerned with social media like Facebook and Twitter. The public is evenly split about the capacity of the judicial system to balance privacy rights with intelligence agency and law enforcement needs. Americans are more comfortable targeting others for surveillance but not themselves. 82% say it’s acceptable to monitor communications of suspect terrorists, 60% say it is acceptable to monitor American leaders, 60% say it is okay to monitor communications of foreign leaders, and 54% say it is acceptable to monitor foreign citizens. 77% believe it is acceptable to monitor US citizen when the person visited child pornography websites. 68% are with monitoring someone who exchanged emails with an imam who preached against infidels, 67% are with monitoring Anti-American groups, and 65% are with monitoring who made search engine queries for keywords related to explosives and automatic weapons. 51% say it is okay to monitor those who are reported by their bank for making unusual withdrawals, 49% are ok with the monitoring of people who use encryption software to hide files, and 49% think it is okay to monitor people who had friends or followers on social media who used hateful language about American…
- 1003 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays