Preview

DOMA Ruling Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
369 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
DOMA Ruling Case Study
DOMA Ruling
Last week was a huge week for our supreme court. There were a couple really important rulings. There was the University of Texas Vs. Fisher, which argued race when accepting students into their school. There was also a voting rights act ruling as well. The one that stuck out most to me was the court’s decision on DOMA. DOMA stands for “defense of marriage act.” It was signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 to prevent same-sex couples whose marriages were recognized by their home state from receiving benefits available to other married couples under federal law.
DOMA caused the federal government to not recognize gay marriages. This meant gay and lesbian partners of federal employees did not receive federal health insurance,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    -shotguns and rifles could be owned but only if weapons were registered, kept unloaded and dissembled or restricted trigger locks.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abagail Fisher, a white female, applied for admission into the University of Texas. She was denied entrance because she did not qualify for Texas' Top 10 Percent Plan. This plan guarantees entrance to the top ten percent of every graduating high school class in Texas. Miss Fisher sued the University of Texas because she claimed that the use of race in admissions to the college violated the Equal Protection Clause from the 14th Amendment. The case made it all the way up to the Supreme Court which came to a final verdict. The University of Texas could use race as a plus factor when considering admissions. This use of race as a plus factor promotes diversity and therefore satisfies strict scrutiny.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Sprigg) The court found that it is up to each individual state to make their own policy on same – sex marriage which was not followed during the time of Windsor. In regards to due process and equal protection, the Supreme Court found DOMA violated laws that the federal government placed in order for all people to be treated equally. (Sprigg) The majority stated that the main purpose of DOMA was to make same – sex couples feel at loss, especially when they were in a marriage. The law wanted homosexuals to feel like they lost their respect for their spouse.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legal victory in Lawrence v. Texas is important not only because it overturned unjust, wrong law. It showed that the law can be ugly. The case removed certain stigma associated not with homosexual conduct, but with gay community itself. Sadly, it could have happened much earlier, but traditions, old values and prejudices kept nation from moving forward.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a member of a different gang driving by. They used Riley's car to get away and then left the car somewheres else. On August 22, 2009 they pulled Riley over while he was driving another car on an expired license registration tag. After Riley was stopped for this violation the officer seized and searched his phone without a warrant, he was arrested on weapon charges. The Riley v. California case was argued April 29, 2014 and decided on June 25, 2014.The main issue in this case was how the police officer searched his phone without a warrant then arrested him and if this action violated the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment clearly states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…”.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Marbury V. US

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the last of President Adams term he wanted to ensure Federalist took control of the Judiciary branch so he named forty-two justices of the piece and sixteen circuit court justices for Washington DC. Once the commissions were signed by the President Adams the Secretary of State had the commissions sealed however they were not delivered by the end of President Adams term. President Jefferson was the incoming president he chose not to honor the commissions due to them not being submitted in time.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King V Burwell Case Study

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court decision in King v. Burwell surrounded the challenge of provision to the Affordable Care Act. The key question the case focused on was whether Obamacare authorized federal tax subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance through a state exchange. The challenger, King, argued the way the law was written can’t allow for states to subsidized insurance through a federal-run exchange. They argued that insurance subsides are only allowed in states that operate their own insurance exchange. Pointing to a clause “established by the state,” the plaintiff argued the way the law, written by members of Congress, authorizes only to tax and subsides in states that established…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shelby County v. Holder 570 U.S. __ (2013) was a United States Supreme Court case concerning Section 5 and Section 4 of The Voting Rights Act of 1965. Section 5 forbids any state or district, that is an eligible voter discrimination area, from making any changes to their election process without federal permission. Section 4 labels a state or district as eligible if said state or district had a literacy test or any other unfair device in place as of November 1, 1964. Section 4 also clarifies how the Justice Department enforces Section 5 of The Voting Rights Act, so if Section 4 is found unconstitutional, then Section 5 can’t be kept either.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    USpreme Court Case Study

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United States Supreme Court cases are argued and decided on Constitutional grounds. All arguments and decisions are based on interpretations of the original Constitution and, more often, on Constitutional amendments.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obergefell V. Hodges is a Supreme court case that sanctioned same-sex marriage in each of the 50 states. The case occurred when a man named James Obergefell sued his home state Ohio to tell the general population of Ohio how the forbidding of gay marriage wasn't right and an infringement of his rights as a citizen. Certain rights are counted in the Constitution. Different rights are not identified in the Constitution but rather are seemingly suggested inside its dialect. Most rights ascending by suggestion get from "freedom" which is found in both the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment. Under the Due Process Clauses, both the federal government and the state governments are denied from authorizing laws that "deny any individual of life, freedom, or property without due process of law." In Obergefell, nobody contended that a counted right…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the demonstrators marched through the streets, chanting their message, a fellow protestor handed Johnson an American flag that had been taken from a flag pole at one of their protest locations. Upon reaching the Dallas City Hall, Johnson doused the flag with kerosene and set it on fire. In addition, Johnson and his fellow demonstrators circled the burning flag and shouted “America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you.” No one was hurt or threatened with injury by the act, but many who witnessed it were deeply offended. Therefore, Johnson was arrested, charged and convicted under Texas “desecration of a venerated…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personally, I agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark case of R. v. Dyment. Particularly, with La Forest J. commentary it provided on the importance of privacy:…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Edith Windsor

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 2009, after the death of her wife Thea Spyer, Edith Windsor, a white female residing in New York, submitted a petition to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses. She was denied from doing so by the section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which only recognized the term “spouse” in marriages between man and woman. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) denied Windsor’s petition to claim the federal estate tax for surviving spouses due to the exemption not being applicable to same-sex marriages. In 2010, Windsor sued the federal government in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, pursuing a refund because DOMA singled out legally married same-sex couples. The third section of DOMA is unconstitutional…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case study provided, one can see many areas where the development of the child in question can be taken into consideration when looking at the case from a law standpoint. In any case involving children, one must always take into account their environment, their developmental age, and their true age. With each age group, there is a norm for development and each child must be evaluated regarding that norm. In this case, the current law regarding the “age of accountability” can be upheld through three basic points. These points are the biosocial, the cognitive, and the psychosocial areas of…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics