The first difference between the two are their approaches: Osama bin Laden uses a very subtle approach by appearing reasonable and open to the resolvement of the issue, but in actuality proposes an impossible solution. His argument is narrow in scope but effective. The Rumiyah casts a wide net in hopes of something catching their reader’s eye. They are not afraid of appearing tyrannical, and offer a wide range of reasons to justify their cause. Their tactic seems to be effective, as several hundred Americans have left the United States to join ISIS, not to mention the tens of thousands within the Middle East., Which tactic is more effective is hard to judge, but their approach shows their clear difference in intended audience. Osama bin Laden’s tactic worked well for Muslims living in the Middle East, since the terms offered seem reasonable and justified. The tactic of the Rumiyah has been effective at drawing support from both Muslim and non-Muslim countries. Bin Laden sought to increase his influence within the Middle East whereas the Rumiyah seeks to inspire homegrown acts of terror. The second key difference are the motivations of each group. While it is difficult to accurately pinpoint the motivation of an individual like Osama bin Laden, from his actions and his written works it seems that his primary goal was to increase his own sphere of influence rather than the destruction of the West. The motivation for the group behind the Rumiyah is the creation of a new Islamic caliphate in the Middle East. These are significant differences between the groups which oftentimes goes unnoticed because of the western belief that in the face of acts of terror, any justification is
The first difference between the two are their approaches: Osama bin Laden uses a very subtle approach by appearing reasonable and open to the resolvement of the issue, but in actuality proposes an impossible solution. His argument is narrow in scope but effective. The Rumiyah casts a wide net in hopes of something catching their reader’s eye. They are not afraid of appearing tyrannical, and offer a wide range of reasons to justify their cause. Their tactic seems to be effective, as several hundred Americans have left the United States to join ISIS, not to mention the tens of thousands within the Middle East., Which tactic is more effective is hard to judge, but their approach shows their clear difference in intended audience. Osama bin Laden’s tactic worked well for Muslims living in the Middle East, since the terms offered seem reasonable and justified. The tactic of the Rumiyah has been effective at drawing support from both Muslim and non-Muslim countries. Bin Laden sought to increase his influence within the Middle East whereas the Rumiyah seeks to inspire homegrown acts of terror. The second key difference are the motivations of each group. While it is difficult to accurately pinpoint the motivation of an individual like Osama bin Laden, from his actions and his written works it seems that his primary goal was to increase his own sphere of influence rather than the destruction of the West. The motivation for the group behind the Rumiyah is the creation of a new Islamic caliphate in the Middle East. These are significant differences between the groups which oftentimes goes unnoticed because of the western belief that in the face of acts of terror, any justification is