In the playwright the dagger is floating, whenever Macbeth tries to reach for it, it goes away. In the film there was a young man holding the dagger, he walked all the way to King Duncan room and Macbeth followed him, changing this scene was a good idea. A floating dagger would be more work to add in, a boy holding the dagger makes the viewers not know that Macbeth is hallucinating, this makes it more believable and better understanding. In the playwright it goes dagger scene, Lady Macbeth convinces Macbeth, and then he kills King Duncan. The film has a different order, first Macbeth has conflict about whether to kill Duncan or not, then Lady Macbeth convinces him, and then he kills Duncan. The film switches the order around to make it make more sense, this helps the viewers to not be confused or it turns out to sound fine in the playwright but look weird in the film. Having Macbeth have seconds thoughts then Lady Macbeth come in and convince him it flows together than the playwright version. I like the film’s version of the dagger scene better, It not only flows better, it's more understandable, having the boy hold the dagger was a very good idea and turned out to look good, and it gives this scene more dramatic,intense, and gloomy …show more content…
The film was a easy way to understand the very difficult playwright, this is especially good for high school and readers who aren't a big reader. Changing the dagger scene was by far the smartest, that scene was well written but confusing in the playwright. Loved how the film changed the order to a less complex and backwards way of doing things. Also having a person holding the dagger instead of the playwright version of a floating dagger, the filmed changed many of the key events to help viewers have a better understanding of the story of Macbeth. The playwright of Macbeth can be confusing and a challenging view of the idea, many would think the playwright version of the dagger scene a bit weird, the film makes it a more modern concept. That's why I relate and agree that the film is a better version and more enjoyable view. The playwright was very hard to read to start off with, it not only was hard to understand but in the playwright I found myself confused on many things which led to a poor understanding of the