Preview

David Hume's Argument Against The Existence Of God

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1640 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume's Argument Against The Existence Of God
David Hume, a noted historian and philosopher, was Scotland’s most famous member of the 18th Century Enlightenment. Like Isaac Newton, Hume embraced radical skepticism and the inductive experimental method of scientific inquiry. He believed that everything we know comes from our senses. Hume attended Edinburgh University when he was in his teens. He hoped to become a professor, but was accused of being an atheist and was unable to find a position. Instead he spent his life traveling, tutoring, and writing. In his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), Hume attempted to define the principles of human knowledge, which he classified as either “impressions” from sensations or inner consciousness, or “ideas” derived by manipulating these …show more content…
Hume’s arguments against the existence of God are not logical or valid for three reasons: the reality and complexity of the universe is evidence for the existence of God; the nature of a miracle is that it interrupts the closed, natural world; and the fact of free will must allow for the existence of a choice that is in opposition to God, or what we call …show more content…
Hume argued that all supposed miracles have a natural, scientific cause, even though we may not yet understand the cause. He stated that there is more reason to believe that a person is lying or deluded than that an actual miracle took place. However, his argument is circular; the nature of a miracle is that it interrupts the closed, natural world. That’s why it’s a miracle! Miracles are God’s breath touching us; they are his voice whispering in our ear. The reality of just one miracle destroys Hume’s entire premise that the world is a self-contained, self-reliant, and closed system. The greatest miracle is Christ’s resurrection. The testimony of multiple witnesses disproves Hume’s assumption that people who witness miracles are lying or being lied to. The resurrection of Christ was not observed by one person or at one time, but by many people over a period of weeks. Also, skeptics and those who persecuted Christians, like Saul, were converted after God’s miraculous intervention. Saul was an educated, Hellenized Jew, who

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hume attempts to counter Paley's argument by saying that the universe is more like an animal than a work of human art. He says that because the universe is not a human art, it does not need a maker, just as animals do not need makers. Therefore, Paley…

    • 756 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To discuss the argument of Hume on miracles, Mackie says we must first develop definitions of laws and miracles that does not automatically mean that the concept of a miracle is incoherent or is logically impossible the miracle occurs. ~ Mackie notes that if we define a miracle as a violation of a law of nature and set a law to be a pattern of how the world works, then it is impossible that the miracle occurs. These definitions imply that the bill violated the miracle was not really a law, because it is an exception; eZeentis thus not a miracle, because it does not violate any law. But that argument Hume and Mackie said that to dis- cuss Hume's argument we need different definitions of laws and miracles. We need an account of the laws and miracles…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's changed the idea of skepticism in a very different way. While Descartes used doubt and skepticism as a way to find out the foundations and roots of knowledge,Hume used sleo contrast with what we saw as the ordinary claims of knowledge. Hume explains two types of skepticism: antecedent and consequent. Both of these come in a very moderate and extreme form. He explains antecedent skepticism by using the Descartes theory of universal doubt. He explains that there is no principle that is more self evident than doubt and even if there was we would not be able to advance ahead of it because we our still able to doubt and reason deductively. This would mean Antecedent skepticism is incurable.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    miracle hume essay 1

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hume uses both an a priori and inductive argument to challenge miracles, which comes from his definition of a miracle as “a transgression of a law of nature which a particular volition of the Deity interposition of some invisible agent.” Hume’s challenge relies on if the laws of nature are fixed, if they are, and the definition of a miracle is that it breaks the laws of nature, then this is a contradiction. If miracles are a contradiction then it is rational to believe that they do not occur. A Biblical example of a miracle is Jesus walking on water - it goes against what we know about gravity and about the properties of water which are both scientific and natural laws, and so it is hard to believe that his could of happened, but due to witnesses it is thought to be true. Hume argues against witnesses as he says it seems more logical to say that the witness is incorrect than to argue that the miracle actually happened.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you had to define the word miracle how would you define it, do you even believe miracles to be true? I know that myself surely believes in them. This whole world is too amazing not to believe. The word miracle and meaning behind it is something I have never dove deep into and have never really questioned so, after reading chapters eight and chapter nine in Faith& Reflection and seeing two different definitions of what John Locke and David Hume think a miracle is to them, I definitely have two new views on the definition of a miracle and I am very eager to share my thoughts with you.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Take as an example the story of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead. Firstly, according to the bible, people witnessed the event. Secondly, our experience of nature is that people who are dead do not come back to life. It is true that many people have had near death experience, but once a person has been in a grace or tomb for a day or two they do not come back to life – they start to rot. So this leads to a conflict between a law of nature and the miracle story. Hume’s question would be; which is more likely – that the law of nature has been violated or that the eyewitness accounts are for some reason mistaken? Hume’s conclusion is that miracles do not happen because there is so much clearly testable evidence in favour of the laws of science. Hume’s conclusion is that no testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony of such a kind that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavours to establish.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Problem of Evil- Notes

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since we have sufficient direct experience to support the existence of evil, if God exists he is either an impotent God or a malicious God; not the God of classical theism. Hume concluded that God therefore does not exist.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Paley vs. Hume and the existence of a higher being Criticism of religious theories and practices is clearly valid and necessary. After all, what caused Jesus’s crucifixion was likely his disapproval of the resistance against his practices and beliefs. Accordingly, religious criticism is certainly more effective if it is respectful rather than dismissiveness, as it has the potential to elicit meaningful dialogue. While some claim that we come from cells that evolved into organisms, others argue that humans are primitive, and that science poses a better explanation to evolution than a fictional higher being. The argument of the former, however, is that if the earth came from a cell, that cell had to come from somewhere…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume does not think we can compare the creation of the universe to a creation of a car or the creator of the universe to the creator of a car. Hume continues to reject this claim by pointing out that the existence of natural evil and moral evil in the world make it very unlikely that God exists. Hume does not think that with all the natural disasters, threats, attacks, homicides etc. that there can be such a perfect being like God. If God is willing and able to prevent evil than why is there so much evil?…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    David Hume discusses the validation of human testimony as far as miracles which are the base for many religions in Section 10 of his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Hume focuses mostly on Christianity and the miracle of Jesus rising from the dead. Hume argues that humans have no compelling reason to believe in miracles, and that the evidence for miracles is most definitely not enough to base a religion upon them. Human knowledge on miracles is all based on human testimony from those who have claimed to witness said miracles. If human experience is our only evidence for miracles one should also think about the probability of human error.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although I disagree with his opinion, Hume exhibits a very sensible argument. David Hume explains four essential circumstances. First of which, Hume believes that God should dispose of all pain. Because both pain and pleasure stimulate humans equally, why should we be able to experience pain? For example, as regular humans we experience feelings such as thirst and hunger, instead of being able to feel the pain of it, we should just be feeling a lack of pleasure. Why is it necessary to feel pain when I simply want to eat or drink something? Secondly, God should eliminate all general laws of nature. For example, if a car crash is about to happen, God should interfere and insure that no person will come to death or extreme injury/pain. Next, God should not dispense talents and abilities unevenly between each of his creations. “God” created animals that obtain optimal strength, ability to fly, and run incredible speeds, while humans are left with minimal physical strengths. God also created people that are talented in sports, making life easier to stay in shape and a possible career by pursuing these particular talents, while there are others who have no special talent and are forced to take extra measures in order to gain fitness and a future career. God should have given equality to all of his creations. Finally, Nature seems to have defects that allow us to see that sometimes…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While many rationalists such as René Descartes support the notion that the concept of Inception is not possible, empiricists such as David Hume may think differently. Hume was an eighteenth-century Scottish philosopher known for his system of radical and philosophical empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism. In one of his works, Hume stated that one cannot create completely new ideas without either prior knowledge of those ideas, or experiencing those ideas. Put differently, he believed that the ideas of an individual are derived or inspired by other ideas that the individual has observed, because there is no such thing as an “original idea.” Taking Hume’s theory into account, in the movie Inception, the protagonist Dom Cobb teaches his new architect, Ariadne, how dreaming works. In their shared dream, Ariadne comes across Dom’s wife, Mal. While this…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of the basic assumptions and beliefs common to philosophers and intellectuals of this period, perhaps the most important was an abiding faith in the power of human reason. The age was enormously impressed by Isaac Newton's discovery of universal gravitation. If humanity could so unlock the laws of the universe, God's own laws, why could it not also discover the laws underlying all of nature and society? People came to assume that through a judicious use of reason, an unending progress would be possible-progress in knowledge, in technical achievement, and even in moral values. Following the philosophy of Locke, the 18th-century writers believed that knowledge is not innate, but comes only from experience and observation guided by reason. Through proper education, humanity itself could be altered, its nature changed for…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays