Preview

David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
185 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
One of the central debates that was brought to light during the time of philosopher David Hume was the debate regarding the nature of God. During the 18th century when Hume lived, nearly everyone believed that God existed, but not many thought to comprehend the nature of God. Hume addresses this question in his work Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion with a conversation primarily between Cleanthes and Philo with periodic interjections by Demea. Throughout this dialogue, they debate the nature of God and Cleanthes tries to champion the argument that God is an intelligent designer and that the universe is essentially one giant machine. This sets the stage for the debate to follow as Philo, and to a certain extent Demea, argue that this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hume criticised the teleological argument in plenty of ways as he believed that the argument was deeply flawed.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Powerful Ideas, An Introduction to Philosophy, aesthetics means "coming from the senses" which is a derivitive of the Greek word, aisthetikos (241). David Hume's believed that emotions are significant in both aesthetics and ethics. In addition, he stated that aesthetics involves both contemplation and judgment. He strongly believes that not everyone is suitable or qualify to judge art.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's changed the idea of skepticism in a very different way. While Descartes used doubt and skepticism as a way to find out the foundations and roots of knowledge,Hume used sleo contrast with what we saw as the ordinary claims of knowledge. Hume explains two types of skepticism: antecedent and consequent. Both of these come in a very moderate and extreme form. He explains antecedent skepticism by using the Descartes theory of universal doubt. He explains that there is no principle that is more self evident than doubt and even if there was we would not be able to advance ahead of it because we our still able to doubt and reason deductively. This would mean Antecedent skepticism is incurable.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is one prevailing question we ask ourselves consistently, “Does God exist?” Every human answer’s that question in their own unique way, which is contingent upon their beliefs, experiences, and influences. The existence of God was significantly debated among philosophers during the 18th and 19th centuries and each esteemed philosopher had a distinct argument explaining their rationale, while criticizing another’s. In this paper, I will analyze William Paley’s argument, “The Teleological Argument,” and how it is disparaged by David Hume and his argument for apparent…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Religion in fiction, much like religion in politics, has grown to be considered taboo. Religious characters are often expected to be comedic and used only as experimental or secondary. Their only true attribute is that of piety, playing on old stereotypes to drive the characterization. In a world where being politically correct gets in the way of day-to-day talk, approaching controversial topics in any form of writing can be seen as potentially unprofitable, too risqué. The competitive market of publishing doesn’t allow room for mistakes anymore and it’s easier to stay on the safe route than to stray on alternative, smaller – often more interesting – roads that may or may not lead to success. This makes…

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Problem of Evil- Notes

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since we have sufficient direct experience to support the existence of evil, if God exists he is either an impotent God or a malicious God; not the God of classical theism. Hume concluded that God therefore does not exist.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay I will discuss the differences between Hume's 'natural' and 'artificial' virtues. I will first give Hume's explanation of why there is a need for a distinction or classification of virtues, and the basis on which he makes the distinction, before describing the two categories and their criteria. I will look at the problems with Hume's account of the distinction, particularly justice. Finally I will describe how the various problems cast doubt on Hume's distinction.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B, thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen, he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes place in order for B to be the result. Hume comes to this conclusion because he maintains that there are secrete causes that cannot be observed by the human eye, thus it is impossible for humans to rationally conclude that one thing caused another…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his work, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume presents a skeptical solution to the problem of induction and how we draw casual inferences. He conveys that we form inferences, not from reason, but from our experiences of cause and effect derived from the principle of custom or habit.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that David Hume’s criticisms against the cosmological argument are insufficient. Hume’s argument is based around two main points, the idea that explaining the parts of the universe is sufficient instead of an explanation of the universe as a whole and that the causal principle is questionable.…

    • 437 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ralph Waldo Emerson asks the question, “Why should we grope among the dry bones of the past.” He begins his book by discussing how age affects thought and asks the question of why we, as adults, have to go by tradition and stories that have previously been told instead of making our own history and “enjoy an original relation to the universe?” (Nature) Emerson’s use of insight in “Nature” demonstrates his view of the meaning in nature and who can truly see the meaning within it (Nature).…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume was born in Edinburgh in 1711. Hume went to school to study law but fell in love with philosophy. He eventually lost his faith and leaned towards skepticism. He was a larger man and was very popular in the social scene, he never married and died of cancer of the bowel in the year of the signing of the declaration of independence.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays