First our main character, Maximus, must be forced to leave home. Although we do not actually see this in the film, we come to the understanding that he had to leave home to serve his country in war. We fill this part of the story in because after the opening sequence, which is the final battle in the conquest of the Roman Empire, Maximus asks to be released to finally return home. This not only fills in the beginning part of the story but gives us the motivation for him to want to go home. This becomes a recurring theme throughout the film as we see many images and hear Maximus speak of his home and family. This also has an effect on the emotions of the viewer. Here we have a general that conquers lands and leads many people to kill, but the viewer is manipulated to see him as the caring father and husband, which gives us the desire to see him return home.
Now for the story to continue many problems must come in the way of Maximus’s journey home, and they do. First his family is murdered by a corrupt ruler, Comidus. Now it would appear that we just want Maximus to get revenge for their deaths, but in the back of our minds we would like to see him reunited with his family. So for us to accept the film both of these expectations must be met, and I will explain how this is done perfectly. His search for revenge drives much of the film as Maximus is traded as a slave and must fight to stay alive. This part of the story is seen in many other “hero” type films; the hero must overcome what appear to be impossible odds to get his vengeance.
You may be wondering how the film can satisfy the last part of the form, the hero returns home, if there is no family and home to return to. During the climax of the movie our hero sustains a lethal injury that he must overcome. As he battles the man that took his family away we see that he is obviously not going to survive that battle. Many people may be upset to see the hero die but that is where this movie uses recurring images to change our feeling about this.
Throughout the film we have seen daydreams of Maximus being with his family and walking through the fields of his home. We see these same images during the final battle between Maximus and Comidus. After Maximus defeats Comidus, satisfying the revenge expectation, Maximus begins to see the images of his family again but this time they are slightly different than before. He is told by one of the other characters to “go to them” just before he finally dies. We go back to the images of his family but now Maximus is there with them walking through his fields. In an unusual way, this satisfies the last part of the story, the hero returns home.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Ridley Scott’s Gladiator (2000), was the first film set in the ancient world produced since the 1960s. Since then, there have been many more films made set in the ancient world. The question is, why was Gladiator able to revive the ancient world genre? After seeing films like Ben-Hur and Spartacus, two of the greatest films ever made set in the ancient world. it is hard not to see the cinematic cues that Gladiator takes from these films. Ben-Hur follows the story of Judah Ben-Hur after he was betrayed by his childhood friend and seeks revenge against the man who wronged. In Gladiator, we have Maximus go on a quest for vengeance after the new emperor has ordered him executed and kills his family. From Ben-Hur we know that this kind of story is not one likely to go our of fashion. Even modern movies that are not set in the ancient world have a story like this.…
- 317 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
When reading about the Roman gladiator games as well as the chariot races and theater events, it can be quite difficult to truly envision what it was like for the participants and the spectators of such events. The participants in such activities were overall viewed as low-class citizens. Gladiators, charioteers and actors in the theater all “had little more status than slaves.” The participants of the games were meant to entertain the spectators, and nothing else. Besides the fact that the participants were seen as low class, they also faced very brutal conditions in the games. The gladiators and charioteers were susceptible to violent, gory deaths. For gladiators, often times their throats were cut and the knives eventually made their way to the gladiator’s hearts. Another possible outcome for gladiators, was being ripped to pieces by various animals. Whether their death came by combat with another gladiator or by animal, it was nothing short of gruesome. This gruesomeness though, was enjoyed by many. Chariot…
- 1517 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
This movie is about adventure from the difference places; braveries, romance and pride of king Odysseus. I see that the movie was indeed in culture and interesting action to fights the problems that he gives from goddess. I can say that Odysseus is a very strong man because even though there are lots of straggled that came’s his life. He is still strong and able to face off it. Odysseus fights against the Trojan he guiding by Athena one of the goddesses. Odysseus didn’t care about anything she said because he said belonged at her home with his wife and he went through many battles to win on his journey to back home.…
- 165 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Dave Pelzer was born on December 29, 1960 in Daly City, California. He is the son of Stephen Pelzer, who was of Austrian and Irish descent, and Catherine Pelzer. Dave Pelzer was the second of five boys in the family. He has experienced a truly horrific lifestyle. As a child, he endured the horrors of child abuse, this included physical torture, mental cruelty, and was nearly starved to death. His mother referred to him as “it”, he was the only child that was abused. The rest of his brothers lived a happy typical life. Dave, on the other hand, was looked at as the family slave. He was forced to sleep in the cold, dark basement on a cot with no blankets or pillow. He had only one pair of clothes and they were all torn and worn out from over the years. It all started when Dave was about two years old.…
- 1701 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
In this paper, “The Matrix” will be analyzed as an example of a mono-myth, by identifying selected topics such as the different stages of the hero’s journey, mythical themes and patterns, and the different archetypes found in the film.…
- 930 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Veni, Vidi, Vici is persuasive because it exploits the opponent's weaknesses by the use of artful rhetoric to sway the audience and the use of themes and motifs from the play. The title “Veni, Vidi, Vici” shows a clever use of irony since the quote is usually associated with Caesar, but in our video we support the conspirators. The trailer immediately starts off by branding Rome in 44 BCE as, “A time where emotion took over reason” (1) and shows a scene of Caesar refusing the crown. Emotion vs. reason is a theme from the play because many character’s lose the sophistication of their occupations by letting their feelings of fear and pride stand in there way. By establishing Rome to be in a dire condition, I use an ethos appeal to make Brutus…
- 375 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Titus Andronicus is a study of the conflict between personal responsibilities and duty to the state. Shakespeare establishes the character of Titus early in the play. He is a loyal subject of Rome, a commander of legions, and a career soldier who devoted his life to defending and expanding the Roman Empire. Titus serves the state in such blind loyalty that it gets to the point of neglecting his duty to his family as a father and patriarch. Throughout the play, from the triumph parade in act 1 scene 1 to the execution of his sons in act 3 scene 1, Titus maintains blind devotion and steadfast loyalty to Rome.…
- 1742 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The movie’s plotline still loosely follows the series of events that actually took place but has changed quite a lot of the facts. Gladiator warps the facts here because Marcus Aurelius supposedly was murdered by Commodus on the eve of this victory but Aurelius in fact passed away before going out to claim another land. Marcus did conquer many tribes and lands as emperor but did not in fact have a legendary general named “Maximus Decimus Meridius”. The events that actually took place in our historical timeline involve Marcus Aurelius passing away but not at the hand of his son Commodus. The official story states that Aurelius died from plague but some suspect that he was in fact murdered by Commodus. According to historical sources, Commodus was in fact a man of ill worth but Aurelius did give Commodus succession to the…
- 708 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…
- 539 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Gladiators were put up against each other to fights to the death. The winning gladiator waited for a sign from the crowd on whether to kill or not to kill the other gladiator; if the gladiator put up a good fight then his life just might be spared (“Gladiators, Chariots, and the Roman Games”.) All Gladiators swore a solemn oath, “I will endure to be burned, to be bound, to be beaten, and to be killed by the sword” (McManus, “Gladiator Games”.)…
- 558 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Upon all the days of my life, I have watched hundreds of movies, but the one that I really cherished the most is Spartacus Blood and Sand. The title character was played by Andy Whitfield, and it was produced by Steven S. Deknight and Robert Tapert. In this movie, a Thracian gladiator called Spartacus from the year 73 to 71 BC, led a major slave uprising against the Roman Republic, by which much innocent blood were shed. These slaves were strong, skillful, and intelligent so some of them became gladiators, including Spartacus and Gannicus, the lovely brother of Spartacus. The rest of the slaves were sent to the farms and mountains to work hard. The gladiators and the other slaves were treated so badly: The female slaves were force to sleep with their masters; the male slaves worked twenty-four hours without giving them food or water; and the gladiators were forced to fight and kill their own brothers. However, the gladiators and the other slaves felt disappointed in their masters, so most of them got the chance to escape and, later on, they returned to save the other slaves and destroy the Roman Empire. It became a huge battle between the escaped slaves led by Spartacus and the soldiers in the Roman Republic. This war was classified as one of the most glorious battles that was fought between two forces, but at the end of the war, Spartacus and his people killed all the Roman soldiers, saved the other slaves, and took over all their properties. From that moment, it became a very great time for Spartacus to be praised as a hero, a savior, and a king. Therefore, Spartacus: Blood and Sand, is the best movie I have ever watched in this world.…
- 1134 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In “Once Upon a Time, Literature. Now What?” published writer James Salter discusses the end of literature in today’s society. He says that's literature is losing it value and art and language are no longer appreciated. The new pop culture is taking over and the new movies and music no longer have any real meaning to them, it's just about success and making money. Value is something has been cast aside. There is no value in the word value anymore. The most important task in the world according to Salter is learning to speak. He says many things in this world would exist but would never be described without language. Written language is extremely important to him, as are books. Salter is frustrated that the spoken languages gets to live on,…
- 876 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This is a film that will keep you on the edge of your seat the entire two hours; there is never a dull moment. Due to Caesar always being a soldier that is all about putting his desires and plans into action, he does not really discuss with anybody what he is planning to do or how he will achieve his goals. Everyone just knows that the goal is to survive and keep the peace, but for some reason the…
- 577 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Through portrayed resistance of foreign domination, The Chinese Connection builds a heroic masculine Chinese identity that revisions China's past. As the film opens, the narrator informs viewers of what the story will be about: the death of a martial arts master in rural China. However, by calling attention to the many rumors regarding master Ho's death, the narrator is essentially emphasizing the unreliability of the story, thus raising the audience's awareness of the tale as a self-conscious reconstruction of the past.…
- 545 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As king, Leonidas command legitimate, coercive, and reward power like his counterpart, Xerxes of Persia. But Leonidas also has referent power that Xerxes does not. Leonidas’ soldiers liked him and would die for him. Xerces’ army was made up of slaves and beasts that fear for their lives. They are forced to fight, and when they fail, Xerxes becomes enraged and beheads them.…
- 986 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays