The Indians had to work on their land for 25 years until they were able to sell it. “There was to be a 25 year trust period to keep Indians from selling their land allotments.” (4029) That means about 1/3 of their life, they would be working on land. I would let the Indians sell their land after 5 years because they would be able to focus on their family and money.
Farming on the land was also necessary for the Indians, or else their land would be taken away. “The Dawes Act was supposed to encourage Indians to become farmers.” (4029) While farming on the land, most of the land was to small for farming, and they would get little rain through year, almost making it impossible to farm. I think if the Indians’ land was suitable for farming than they could farm, however if their land was not suitable, or got little rain, than farming is optional.
With farming, the Indians had to pay taxes. The land was not a choice to get and now they have to pay taxes on it. If the didn’t pay taxes, then the land would be taken away. The Indians shouldn’t have had to pay taxes because they were forced to take control of the land.
I would change the Dawes Act because they were treating the Indians unfairly and taking away their rights as a Native American. The federal government placed guardianship under all the tribes. The ways I changed the Dawes Act would have been successful because the Indians would have gotten a little more of their way, and they wouldn’t have been mad at the whites.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The first section of the book is called Grievances. Woody Holton explains the background history of land speculators versus Indians and the Privy Council. The author explains numerous points of argument in this section, and would show how the Indians tried to make peace to keep their lands. They negotiated a treaty with the British government, which they retained every acre that Jefferson claimed (Holton, p.4). Furthermore, Holton explains these viewpoints had a greater influence of America’s Declaration of Independence in 1763, which was led by land speculators and white Virginians declaring Independence from Britain in 1776. Resulting the state constitution that nullified the Proclamation in 1763 and the Quebec Act (Holton, p. 38).…
- 114 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
There were benefits and sacrifices for adapting the Dawes Act in 1887. It allowed Native Americans to merge with Americans through U.S. citizenship. It also opened land for settlers to move West, but at the same time allotted Native Americans a selective amount of land. Native Americans were required to register with an English name on the Dawes Poll to be considered in the land distribution. The Act is perceived by some that it benefited the American people more than the Native Americans.…
- 340 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Question 2 (Worth 5 points) How could the federal government have made the Dawes Act more successful? by refusing to allow Native Americans to assimilate by making it illegal for Native Americans to sell their land to speculators by providing larger land parcels so the Native Americans could grow more crops by using land speculators as brokers between the government and Native Americans Points earned on this question: 5 Question 3 (Worth 5 points) What was the goal of the Dawes Act?…
- 331 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
6. The Dawes Act was passed in 1887 and it tried to dissolve Indian tribes by redistributing the land. It was designed to forestall growing Indian poverty, but it resulted in many Indians losing their land to speculators.…
- 1186 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Dawes failed because the Native Americans were not used to settled agricultural life. The land granted to most the people were not sufficient economic viability, and division of land between heirs upon the allottees deaths resulted in land being divided. Most allotment land, which could be sold after a statutory period of 25 years, was eventually sold to non-Native buyers at a surprisingly cheap price. Also, land was considered to be “surplus” beyond what was needed for allotments was open to white settlers, though the profits from the sales of these lands often invested in programs meant to help and aid the American Indians. The native Americans lost, over nearly 50…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
For the most part Native Americans didn’t have a concept of land ownership. The tribes were very mobile and didn’t stay in one place. They moved from place to place along with the seasons so everything was made so that it could be mobile and could be moved when needed. They did not believe in owning the land however they believe that they should live off of the land.…
- 1217 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The English did not understand the Indians and their lifestyle. They judged them as being barbaric and savage but were mistakenly wrong, “Before contact with the strangers from Europe, the Choctaws practiced communalism” (Takaki, 2008. Pg. 83). The Choctaws were forced to raise animals such as cattle and pigs in a farm setting. They were not longer able to go out and hunt their meals as they had for many years. Along with farming, they were also cultivating cotton fields. After treaties were made and it became legal for the English to take land they pleased, many of the Choctaw Indians moved unwillingly west of the Mississippi…
- 1267 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
"In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…
- 3003 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
John L. O’Sullivan had said, “‘... our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.’” (www.britanica.com) During Andrew Jackson’s term, America had set its sights on the untamed West - which, inconveniently, happened to be the Indians’ territory. President Jackson decided to create a controversial treaty that would allow America to exchange the Indians’ land for a large piece of land in the Louisiana Territory. It was created on May 28, 1830 and sparked much criticism and support throughout the nation. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians were enemies of America, they were given good land, and they were offered the government’s protection.…
- 809 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
With new changed American perceptions came new changes to laws and government. There were a bunch of new beliefs arising. Now the idea was to get rid of the Indians, make the land uninhabited so the wilderness land could be preserved. Spencer goes on to say that getting rid of that wilderness preservation went hand in hand with getting rid of the Indians. It…
- 719 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Dawes Act was a document that authorized the President of the United States to assess American Indian land and divide it into allotments for individual Indians. Those who agreed to allotments would then be granted United States citizenship. During this time in the mid 1800s the United States and its citizens had their hearts set on Westward expansion. Americans were strongly encouraged by the belief of the “Manifest Destiny”, a widely held belief that settlers were destined by God to expand throughout the continent. Though this expansion proved to be essential in the construction of today’s United States of America, the forceful removal of these Native people became a major issue.…
- 692 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
3. Did the Indians have a concept of land ownership? If so, what was it? What did it mean to own the land for an Indian?…
- 1527 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The Dawes Act was also known as the General Allotment Act of 1887. The purpose of the act was to treat the Native Americans as individuals rather than members of their tribes. The Dawes act was created to encourage the Native American tribes to split up. The Native Americans would be given the land and tools they needed if they became farmers. The Act would teach the Native Americans to be equal like the rest of the American population. For example, children of the Native American ethnicity were sent to boarding school where they would be taught to be like a white person. The Dawes act was a way for the individuals of the Native American tribes to receive citizenship. Once an individual received his or her allotment, it meant that they were…
- 345 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Dealing with the Dawes Act, was important towards the Native Americans and life itself. The Dawes Act was a succeeding policy by breaking up reservations by granting land allotments to individual Native Americans. The President broke up reservation land that was held in common by the members of the tribe. Native Americans registering a tribal “roll” were granted allotments to be parceled out to individuals. The Dawes Act was purportedly to protect Indian property rights.…
- 330 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the late nineteenth century, twenty years after the Homestead Act, farmers used their land in the western plains to produce both crops and profits. The farmers of this time struggled in the agricultural way of life by facing economic and political obstacles that were impossible to avoid, requiring them to do something about their complaints. Although the farmers had plausible arguments for most of their criticisms, their beliefs of the silver standard and overproduction sometimes could not be backed up. However, farmers continued to struggle between inevitable issues like the currency debate, constant debt and rising costs.…
- 435 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays