Preview

Dbq Articles Of Confederation Ineffective

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
672 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dbq Articles Of Confederation Ineffective
Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership. The Articles were ineffective because Congress only had the power to recommend actions to the states. It could not enforce its recommendations or laws. Each state had its own constitution, money system, and means to …show more content…

Congress had no way to collect taxes to pay off pre-war debts. This led to chaos and anarchy when soldiers that hadn't been paid marched on Philadelphia, and Congress had to flee to Princeton New Jersey (Document C). Each State had it's own money, but there was no national money system. Since the money had no value from state to state, the people began to use the barter system of trade. This reduced the amount of trade and importation of goods. There was very little economic progress and growth during this period, even though the population was increasing. (Document B). Self interest of the states and of individuals added to the cause of the problems. For example, John Jay tried to create a treaty with Great Britain that would have been bad for the merchants of the United States but it would have paid off the war debt. His loyalty was not to the people of his state. (Document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although the Articles of Confederation provided a working government for the United States, it was not necessarily an effectively working government; an effective government would be one that not only establishes control and authority, but one under which the nation flourishes. Certainly the Articles set down a basic government with the idea of a democratic republic. However, the Articles of Confederation didn't impose an effective government as much as it set the basis for one. It was unable to enforce many laws and many of those set were also unequal in operation, as unfair to some states as fair to others. Thus, from 1781 to 1789, the Articles of Confederation established a working, yet ineffective government, with very little control or authority over foreign relations, the economy, and western lands.…

    • 927 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Britain, the aftermath left the nation poor due to unpaid loans from creditors as well as the…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation of 1781 produced the first endeavor of government structure. This attempt of forming a national and state government failed. Some of the issues that transpired from the constitution include: Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of state size; Congress did not have the powers to tax or regulate foreign or interstate commerce; There was not a recognized national court system or executive branch to enforce acts passed by Congress; While amendments to the Constitution required a unanimous vote, the passing of a law required a 9/13 vote. The lack of involvement of the national government allowed states to become self-governing and sovereign. States printed their own money that only had value within that territory which created a hindrance in trade and in turn produced an unstable economy. The national government having no enforcing authority and the United States of America was in a state of chaos. This generated an out lash from individuals.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States' form of government from 1781-1789, was based on the Articles Of Confederation. The document itself did provide the early establishment with a form of national government, a legislative branch, and expansion of land to the west, but still had more weaknesses than it did strengths. The articles were weak and would not be able to provide the growing nation with an effective government. One of the main reasons being (for the weaknesses), was the States' fear of a strong executive branch, in other words, the monarchial government they fought to be free from during the Revolution. The articles failed to efficiently regulate trade, levy taxes, and predominantly enforce the laws written. As time progressed, rather than revising the articles, a better Constitution was needed to replace this ineffective government.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Articles of confederation created in 1776, was the first constitution of the United States of America. The Articles of Confederation had served as the agreement between the thirteen sovereign states and was ratified by 1777. The Articles had served as the start of a new government that had brought many benefits and prosperity to the country. Even with a strong state government, when faced with foreign and issues on a national level, the Articles lacked a strong central government. From 1781-1787 the articles started debilitating, even with all the gains that it had as a government.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1985 DBQ

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation did not provide the U.S. with an effective government because of the weakness of the Articles. The Constitution is stronger and much more effective than the Articles. Under the Articles congress could not collect money, we couldn’t pay our bills, and the government had no good way to stop rebellion. The constitution improved on this in many ways. I don’t think the Articles would be so bad if we did not have to compare them to the much greater Constitution.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Doc A) A letter from the Rhode Island Assembly was sent to Congress stating the fact that states cannot tax. Under the Articles of Confederation state taxes could not be impressed, which forced them into economic failure. It also allowed Congress to collect from any state without a limit to time and the amount taken; this would allow Congress to become independent. Under the Articles of the Confederation Congress was allowed the power to choose which states they were to obtain money. Congress decided to obtain this money from the states, the ones that were commercially inclined. This act severely affected the commerce of Rhode Island and other states. The Articles of Confederation only proved to be a terrible idea among most states and the country. In 1770, the United States had the smallest population and income. In 1775, right before the Articles of the Confederation with a small population brought in the most income over a period of twenty years. Since the Articles of Confederation the population would still be increasing and the revenue would became pretty stable. However, in time the limited income under the Articles of Confederation would not be able to suite the growing population. Soon after the government would not be able to pay off debt and would not be able to tend the states needs which effected the people. Soon under the Articles of Confederation the government would become broke. . (Doc B), Shows…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From 1781 to 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government;” a bold statement considering the fact that the Articles lasted only 8 years. Although, I suppose the case could be made that the Articles of Confederation provided the means for a temporary government, only acting as a first-time attempt for the colonies in creating a more perfect representation for the colonies as a whole. This is true in some ways and in some ways it’s not; for instance, just the fact that the Articles lacked the necessary provisions for a sufficiently effective government. There was no president or executive agencies or judiciary, nor was there a tax base…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    States had much more power at their feet than ever before. An example of this was that the states had a great deal of control over politics. One such power was that every colony or state was allowed one vote in Congress (93). Furthermore, the colonies needed a united vote if any amendments were to be made to the Articles of Confederation (Davis). Because there was no national court system under the Confederation, the states resolved controversies amongst themselves. Moreover, the excess power that the Articles placed on the states was with the enforcement of laws; the states had the freedom to enforce any laws they saw fit. Giving states too much power in politics led to chaos that the national government absolutely had no control over (Johnson). Another example of the disarray of domestic affairs was the failure of a successful military. During the American Revolution, the Continental Army was moderate, but once the war was won, the military was largely demobilized (Alden 109). Only a small national force protected the country. The United States’ dream was to build a unified war-making regime, but it was a complete failure, especially after the Revolution (111). America’s dream went spiraling down until there was no hope of a centralized army. The Articles of Confederation government continued…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    failure under the Articles to get favorable trade agreements with foreign nations. Because the credibility of the Federal government was weak, meaning it was not sovereign in the Confederation and it did not represent the people as a whole.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were numerous of problems under the “Articles of Confederation”. Several of the main problems were its incapacity of increasing funds, the necessity of completing consent to accomplish modifications , the “lack of authority over internal trade , foreign relations, and debt.” The central problem was that the states turned down the idea of giving the national government sufficient power to function properly. The articles gave each single state “independence”, but gave the “federal government” very little power. Congress had a hard time ratifying laws for the reason being that “ 9 out of 13 states” had to concede with passing them before any of them could fully go through .Congress did not have the authority to accumulate taxes required…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the system by which America was run from 1777-1788. When it was run by the Articles, America was weak and it was mocked by the countries of the world. While the Articles of Confederation had some strengths, the number of weaknesses greatly outweighed them. The ratification of the Constitution in 1788 helped to alleviate most of these problems. Even though there weren't many strengths, the Articles solved some major problems, including the distribution of western lands. There were many weaknesses that the government tried to solve, such as repayment of debt, but the Articles couldn't enforce tax collection. The Constitution, written because of weak central power, helped solve many of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. The government under the Articles had so few strengths because the people were afraid of a strong central government.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the Articles couldn’t fulfill the purposes of government like it was supposed to. They were supposed to set up many laws to keep the states and the country as a whole in order. They couldn’t do that; so instead the states made up their own rules and followed them. That also caused the states to become more independent. Also, since there were no laws, that means that the government couldn’t enforce any laws. Although, it could provide some services, but that was the only purpose the government could fulfill. Who wants a government that can’t do what it was meant to do? The Articles didn’t fulfill the purposes of government and that is why it failed as a government.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, they made sure this wouldn’t happen by giving the government very little power over the citizens, also giving the states the power to create their own constitutions, have their own forms of executive and legislature, and coin their own money. This proved terrible for the economy of the new country, for it was already in an enormous post-war debt. Congress could not enforce laws, regulate interstate trade (resulting in various tariffs between the states), or tax people directly, and the only way to change any of these rules was if all states approved of such a change. Each state had its own currency, causing havoc for trade in a country that was already forced to borrow money from others. Some states such as Massachusetts issued very high taxes, trying to collect specie even from the war veterans and farmers who could not be paid due to Congress’s inability to tax people directly, ending up in tragedy such as Shays’ Rebellion. This led to fears of anarchy and a “mobocracy.” The state governments and Congress were forced to print a huge amount of paper money, leading to the worst inflation in U.S. history between 1778 and 1783. America’s trade deficit was also astoundingly high during this period of time. It is very evident that the U.S. economy suffered under the Articles of…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Also, under the Articles, each state had one vote in Congress, no matter the size of the state. This caused problems because the larger states thought they should have more representation because they had a larger population. The larger states often ignored Congress and did what they wanted, like negotiate with foreign nations. They got away with this because there was no way to punish individuals. The root of this problem was that there was no judicial system in place.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays