In the time of 1875-1900, many capitalists formed the growing of industry in America as highly regarded captains of industry or fraudulent robber barons. The robber barons were industrialists who possessed the majority of wealth in America. This wealth gained was mostly through the expense of others, creating a greater space between the fortunate and the less fortunate ones. Captains of industry were industrialists that did the opposite. They assisted the American growth positively whether it was through the economy or acts of philanthropy which helped to equalize the gap between the rich and poor. Some of the famous capitalists at this time were Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller.
These two well-known capitalists, Carnegie and Rockefeller, were certainly captains of industry. As captains of industry, they believed in stopping the progression of the wealthy class becoming wealthier and the poor classes becoming poorer. This was a problem Henry George talked about in his book Progress and Poverty which explained how to handle the cycle of industrial economy. Henry George’s philosophy, later known as Georgism, states that everybody owns what they create yet nature items are shared, especially land. (Doc A) Being successful industrialists, these captains of industry also had a duty to give back to the unfortunate and assist them in gaining wealth themselves, as well. As Carnegie stated in his Gospel of Wealth, captains of industry must “administer in the manner which, in his judgment, is best calculated to produce the most beneficial results for the community.” In other words, these men must help the community prosper and both men had done so. (Doc C) Both Carnegie and Rockefeller became philanthropists and donated their money to numerous worthy causes. Earning their title “captains of industry” came not only with their great works of philanthropy, but also with their positive success in industry. Coming from a poor family and having a small amount of education, Carnegie was able to lead the massive expansion of the steel industry. He worked his way up and brought prosperity to his family using vertical integration. Andrew Carnegie proved to be a true captain of industry, though there were times in which he could have been seen as a robber baron, too. He urged for the rights of laborers to unionize and to protect their jobs, however steel workers were often pushed to long hours and low wages. Carnegie made quite a few technological innovations, including machines for steel, which greatly sped up the process of making steel. However, the machines brought about negative results such as the growing of unskilled workers and the pessimism of American laborers towards machines as stated in Document F. Workers viewed the machines as more work for them, having to constantly work at the same pace of the machine with no break and doing the same thing repeatedly. These circumstances demonstrated the robbery of the people’s willingness to work. (Doc F) Rockefeller’s positive success in the American industrialization period was founding the dominating Standard Oil Company. He came from a Baptist family of six children who frequently moved. Starting his first job as a bookkeeper, Rockefeller moved on to greater careers. He later formed the Standard Oil Company which became one of the largest shippers of oil and kerosene and was refining over 90% of the oil in the country. Through horizontal integration, which eliminated competitors, Standard Oil was increasingly gaining almost total control of oil refining and marketing. Although, according to the Supreme Court, the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey violated the Sherman Antitrust Act and was ruled that the trust derived in illegal monopoly practices. As a result, it was ordered to be broken up into 34 new companies. Like Document E says, trusts had a harmful effect because everything was controlled by one. So it is proven that Rockefeller, too, had a few characteristics of a robber baron. For John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie, “captains of industry” was the more accurate classification. They proved to have more admirable qualities rather than unworthy ones. Both men meant well in their life by their philanthropic ways and with their efforts to create social equality. The men were successful industrialists, in Steel and in Oil, which led to a newly industrialized South. (Doc B) Additionally, the both men became two of the richest men in America. Rockefeller and Carnegie clearly deserved the characterization of “captains of industry.”
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The industrial capitalists of the late 19th century should be regarded “Robber Barons” for many reasons. One example was with religious places. Money corrupts anyone. Many people think that if they had that much power or money, then they’d only do good with it, and help everyone, but in the end, it corrupts them all. It’s human nature to want power and money and humans do what it takes to do so.…
- 483 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In a sense, Vanderbilt and Rockefeller are captains of the industry but only by using a capitalist approach with intensive labor. Using false hopes for the immigrants that wanted a better life. Feeding them lies and poor wages which explains their robber baron intent. These men upon lucky made their wealth. The fact is that these millionaires trapped people into the notion that American dream to work hard and you too can obtain wealth. Understanding that social Darwinism implements the survival of the fittest in social and political stance is basically a one-way streak. People who have the right upbringings and domination over the lower class. Economic divisions are mostly important to wealth and inherited wealth they don’t want to be in the…
- 365 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
George Washington had led the Continental Army through battle after battle, and only won two minor battles. While the British set up comfortable quarters in Philadelphia, George Washington had his men build uniform huts in Valley Forge, a few miles away. Sickness and disease ran rampant, and conditions were torturous. Your family is poor and your mother is ill. Since your nine-month enlistment is up, Washington's men are progressing from hut to hut to find out if soldiers will reenlist or quit. The question asked by this Mini-Q is, ‘Had you been a soldier at Valley Forge, would you have quit?’ I would have quit because the British army had so many advantages and illness was almost unavoidable.…
- 562 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
•Takes into account the sources of the documents and analyzes the authors’ points of view.…
- 1491 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, were both at one point in there life’s the richest men in the world. However they both had very different trails getting to their fortunes. Rockefeller was more or less handed money being part of the prestige aristocracy, however he was a very shred and organized man. He stressed the idea of planning ahead and never procrastinating, in most cases he was a penny-pinching millionaire. Even as a child he was always very organized and always planned ahead. This helped contribute to his success in his life with is Oil Company. Andrew Carnegie was not as fortunate as Rockefeller; he was an Irish Immigrant and at one point in his life was making a $1.70 a week. He was the epitome of the American dream; he rose…
- 274 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
artists, Two Angels by Duccio di Buoninsegna from the Middle Ages and the Mona Lisa by…
- 399 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
During the 1750’s through the 1780’s American society was becoming increasingly less democratic in terms of property distribution and more democratic when it came to social structure as well as politics and religion. The tolerance of religion may have sparked from the Great Awakening during this time period. The evidence shown from society in Wethersfield, Connecticut, is a great paradigm of the changes in American society.…
- 572 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Role of Government Directions The following question requires you to construct a coherent essay that integrates your interpretation of Documents A–H and your knowledge of the period referred to in the question. High scores will be earned only for essays that both cite key pieces of evidence from the documents and draw on outside knowledge of the period. 1. Analyze the extent to which western expansion affected the lives of Native Americans during the period 1860–90 and evaluate the role of the federal government in those effects. Use the documents and responses to each document to construct your response. Document A Santana, Chief of the Kiowas Source: Santana, Chief of the Kiowas, 1867. U.S. Bureau of Ethnography Annual Report, 17th, 1895–96. “A long time ago this land belonged to our fathers; but when I go up to the river I see camps of soldiers here on its bank. These soldiers cut down my timber; they kill my buffalo; and when I see that, my heart feels like bursting; I feel sorry.” 1. Why do you believe there are soldiers camped out on the outskirts of Indian territory?…
- 1302 Words
- 6 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The College Board Advanced Placement Examination UNITED STATES HISTORY SECTION 1 1 (Suggested writing t i m M 0 minutes) Directions: The following question requires you to construct a coherent essay that integrates your interpretation of Documents A-I and your knowledge of the period referred to in the question. High scores will be earned only by essays that both cite key pieces of evidence from the documents and draw on outside knowledge of the period.…
- 1167 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
They created so many job opportunities, built industries that benefited the whole country and gave away much of their hard earned money. Capitalists of the nineteenth century may have been considered robber barons but they were for the most part captains of industry. The American Industrial Revolution fundamentally changed politics, society, and the economy. Factory workers and consumerism had changed immensely in the Gilded Age; about 400,000 patents were made between 1875 and 1900 which signifies the departure of farming to the vast significance of industries. Trade Unions became an immense part in Urban communities since the people longed for shorter hours and higher pay rates.…
- 1694 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Andrew Carnegie is a perfect example of someone who worked for everything he had. He built his fame, fortune, and respectable reputation, from the ground up. He did so by his very successful steel business that literally blew other competitors out of the industry. However, many will argue that Carnegie was a “Robber Barron” because of his smart risky actions that include buying out everything that was needed for the industry which lead to a monopoly in the steel industry. Andrew Carnegie worked from being a migrant immigrant to a very successful man. This shows pure dedication to one’s occupation. Andrew Carnegie was a captain of industry because he believed that no man should die a rich man and followed the philosophy of philanthropy. With this belief, he plowed his wealth back into society by building public libraries, donating to collages, forming the Carnegie Endowment for International peace, and much more. Carnegie was the richest man alive at one point and gave 90 percent of his wealth away. There is not a single argument that can credibly prove Andrew Carnegie as a Robber Barron.…
- 715 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Captains of Industry- was a business leader whose means of amassing a personal fortune contributes positively to the country in some way. This may have been through increased productivity, expansion of markets, providing more jobs, or acts of philanthropy. This characterization contrasts with that of the robber baron, a business leader using political means to achieve his ends.…
- 1709 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
3. As a reporter covering the strike at the Homestead Mill, I would say that Frick and Carnegie are Robber Barons. Although they claim to be Captains of Industry, creating jobs and invigorating the economy, they take and take and take. Carnegie and Frick eliminate all…
- 646 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Industrial tycoons of the nineteenth century used whatever they could to get to the top of the economy, by either contributing positively or in some cases even if it meant destroying all the other industries that got in their way. In the nineteenth century, industrial tycoons were known as either a robber baron (Jay Gould) or a Captain of Industry (Henry Ford). Depending on how someone contributed to the growth of businesses, labeled them as one or the other. Some of the contributing factors that played an effect on identifying an industrialist as a robber baron or industry captain are how they came to power of the business industry, how they used their power, and how they gave back to society. These industrial tycoons were some of the wealthiest men in the US.…
- 934 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
More often than not, America’s antebellum capitalists are accused of being the “robber barons” of industrial America. The misconception is that these men took advantage of a naïve and growing economy and reaped its benefits without giving anything in return. True, the majority of America was poor in comparison to the few elites, but the philanthropist efforts and contributions of these men cannot be denied. If not for these men and their efforts, there would have been no one to pave the road to America’s industrial domination.…
- 475 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays