Preview

DBQ Jury System

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1485 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
DBQ Jury System
Instructions
1. Keep a pen or pencil and place your binder on the back table.
2. Each group needs to assign the following responsibilities: . 1 member to be the recorder (secretary) - you will be writing on chart paper.
.1 member to be the leader - lead the group discussions & make sure the group gets the tasks done; keeps track of time
.2 members to present the group final information/consensus Bell Ringer 03/13/2013
 Independently, on the handout provided, match the DBQ terms/vocabulary on the left with the correct definition on the right side (3 min.).  Share with group members your answers, come to a group consensus
(agreement) about each answer (3 min).
 Whole class sharing.

___
G Jury
___
D Verdict
___
A Juror
___
H Controversial
___
B Deliberation
___
C Acquit
___
F Unanimous
___
E Pool

A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.

a member of a jury careful consideration before a decision found not guilty decision a randomly selected group of people total and complete agreement
A group of ordinary citizens who are chosen to render a decision in a court case H. something that causes strong disagreement Reread the story individually and mark (with highlighter) the reasons Sally wants students to make the decision (student Jury) 3 min.

Brainstorm why it might be better for the principal to make the decision and write the three best reasons on the paper –
3 min.

Discuss and write the three best reasons on the chart paper – 3 min.

Sample answers:

Will be fair to another student.

Is an expert with lots of experience.

Has best understanding of the situation in the classroom.

Will not be swayed by emotion or sentiment. Will decide the facts of the case in front of them.

His/her decision will be consistent with similar incidents in the past.

1

6

2

7

3

4

8
9

10

5
11

Bellringer 3/15
As a group discuss the answers and then individually answer in complete sentences that re-states the question (5 minutes)

• 1.What is the difference between a jury trial and a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Juror #1 is easily frustrated and gets uptight when someone disobeys his authority. He was concerned with maintaining his control and keeping the proceedings formal.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aed 201 Week 6

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Perform a search in the University Library databases and locate four school-related court cases (with outcomes decided), two which involve educators as defendants and two which involve students as defendants. Fill in the table below. When you give your informed opinion, state and discuss whether you agree or disagree with the outcome. Base your opinion on legal and ethical standards as discussed in Ch. 9 of the text. If you do not agree with the outcome, explain what would have been just. Base your explanation upon the rights and responsibilities of those involved. Cite your sources in APA format below the table.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With every person convicted they have a right to trial and jury. There is a grand jury. Second kind of jury is a trial or petite jury. If the paragraphs below I will try to explain the differences between the two .…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dq's Dual Court System

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is the dual court system? What is the reasoning behind having a dual court system in the United States? What would happen if there was not a dual court system in the United States?…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    So from this weeks lecture I have to say the most intriguing concept was defiantly the concept of jury nullification as prior to this week i believed that the juries sole duty was only to determine whether or not a defendant was responsible for a certain crime and the sentencing was left to the judges. Due to this concept, i believe there are both strengths and weaknesses to the juries rational since this all depends on whether or not the jury sympathises with the defeat. the weakness would be that no matter how guilty a defendant if they are able to get the jury to believe they didn't know what they were doing was wrong or their actions were of malicious intent just something that needed to be done, they could get away with…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict that is the opposite of what the jury believes or the verdict it was instructed to return by the court” (Rottenstein Law Group, 2014). In the course of a regular criminal trial, the judge will hand down some directives to the jury. The judge will inform the jury that they should set aside any feelings that they may take personal and achieve a decision exclusively in light of the truth displayed at trial. However, juries overlook these directions and clear criminals who plainly disobeyed the law. Current lawful guidelines firmly disapproval jury nullification and restrict encouragements for a jury panel to nullify the law. Therefore, a legal counselor may not, even with the within the…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juries are a fundamental institution within Canadian law and decide a large portion of important cases, changing many lives. Considering that a jury is simply a group of citizens who appeared to be the right fit for jury duty on a list, do we place too much power in their hands? This paper looks at the jury’s power of nullification and why it should or should not continue to be a part of the Canadian justice system and if it should, how can we improve it? Drawing on real cases and scholarly journals this paper will attempt to address some major points on this issue. First of all, what exactly is jury nullification and how is it used in Canadian courts? Also what are the strengths and weaknesses of nullification and how have we seen these in…

    • 2637 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will provide an analysis of a jury trial; my analysis will focus on the right of the defendant. I will articulate how a defendant 's rights at trial can be assured when it comes to The defendant’s right to a speedy trial, the defendant’s right to an impartial judge and the defendant’s right to an impartial jury.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “It is not only the juror’s right, but his duty to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” This is what John Adams said of jury nullification. John Jay, who was the first justice of the Supreme Court said, “The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy.” So what is jury nullification and how does it influence courtroom proceedings and judicial practices?…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most countries in the world today do not use juries, and only a small percentage of cases in the United States are decided by juries. So why exactly do Americans have juries? What role do they play in our system? And does it make sense for modern America?…

    • 588 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jury Nullification

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Butler, Paul, Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System, 105 Yale…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Selection

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury selection are various methods used to decide who will be on the jury. The jury pool is initially chosen from among the community utilizing a random strategy. Jury records are gathered from voter enlistments and driver permit/state id. From these records, some people are mailed. They will be addressed in court by the judge and/or lawyers in the U.S. According to Shari Seidman, in some cases such as capital punishment, the jury must be death qualified. Jury procedures are taught in law institutions to law students. The jury chose is said to have been empanaled.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due Process

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A jury trial is a vital stage in the process; all of the investigation that has taken place concerning the accused person will be presented during this process. A jury trial is made up of twelve citizens of the community who have been randomly selected to serve on the jury. The jury had been given the authority to judge the facts of the case, and them apply the law that was given by the judge to those facts, and render a verdict of guilty or not guilty.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Duty

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My thoughts on my early morning experience during jury duty selection-I noticed a few elements of successful teaching. The judge was very explicit in explaining the judicial process for selecting a jury, and in explaining the process for a civil case. She presented, gave examples, and even checked for understanding throughout the process. It was funny how I started connecting her questioning of the potential jurors to be like TDQs in the way that each question was essential to some element of the case (were there any connections to the parties involved, the businesses, workers, was there a past experience like the case that could impact your thinking or decision…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics