One famous example was Muhammed Ali who claimed to be a “Conscientious Objector”. Ali requested for exemption from the draft on the basis of being a practicing pacifist. When they rejected his requested, Ali refused to be recruited. For this, the state took away his boxing license, title, and he was prosecuted (Lederman par. 2). In retaliation, Ali took the state to court. Under the grounds of equal employment, Ali won his license back (Lederman par. 2). The state had tried to make Ali fight, and many others as well, but they realized they were losing this battle. Inevitably, the anti-war movement shot itself in the foot. Many Americans, some experts suggest over half, did not support the war (Barringer par. 12). However, there was not a unanimous ideology on how to handle the movement. Eventually the founding SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) members were replaced with new leaders who gave the movement a new face (Barringer par 12). The movement shifted from mostly non-violent protests to spitting on soldiers and riots in the streets. The American people were frustrated with the actions of their Government. They did not support the war in Vietnam for many different reasons, that was their prerogative. However, many Americans were also not in favor how some of the anti-war movement protested the war. It was an unusual paradigm that was, quite frankly, fueled by drugs and hormones. It was not unlike that of a modern
One famous example was Muhammed Ali who claimed to be a “Conscientious Objector”. Ali requested for exemption from the draft on the basis of being a practicing pacifist. When they rejected his requested, Ali refused to be recruited. For this, the state took away his boxing license, title, and he was prosecuted (Lederman par. 2). In retaliation, Ali took the state to court. Under the grounds of equal employment, Ali won his license back (Lederman par. 2). The state had tried to make Ali fight, and many others as well, but they realized they were losing this battle. Inevitably, the anti-war movement shot itself in the foot. Many Americans, some experts suggest over half, did not support the war (Barringer par. 12). However, there was not a unanimous ideology on how to handle the movement. Eventually the founding SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) members were replaced with new leaders who gave the movement a new face (Barringer par 12). The movement shifted from mostly non-violent protests to spitting on soldiers and riots in the streets. The American people were frustrated with the actions of their Government. They did not support the war in Vietnam for many different reasons, that was their prerogative. However, many Americans were also not in favor how some of the anti-war movement protested the war. It was an unusual paradigm that was, quite frankly, fueled by drugs and hormones. It was not unlike that of a modern