Preview

Deal v. Hamilton County Dept. of Education

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1677 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deal v. Hamilton County Dept. of Education
Due Process and Parental Rights:
Deal v. Hamilton County Board of Education

Grand Canyon University: SPE 350
28 October 2012

Due Process and Parental Rights: Deal v. Hamilton County Board of Education
In 2004 the case of Deal v. Hamilton County Board of Education was coming to a close after reaching the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Ohio. Within this essay, detailed examination of this case, along with issues that developed the case, disagreement points, parties involved, and final outcome will be explored. This case was initiated in 1999 and reached the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in 2004. The Individuals with Disabilities Act has given parents and caregivers to student’s unparalleled rights regarding their student’s education. This case clearly outlines the difference in the interpretation of these laws and regulations between schools, parents, and even the various levels of courts. The primary issues that brought this case to court were the need for clear interpretation of a Free and Appropriate Education, as well as the school meeting the regulations that were outlined in IDEA (Osborne & Russo, 2007). The final outcome of this case gave more than a decision; in this case not only were the student and parents affected but the school as well. This case identifies the judicial process as well as individual interpretation of the laws regarding educating students with special needs. In this court case, the Plaintiffs or Appellants were identified as Maureen Deal; Phillip Deal, Parents, on behalf of Zachary Deal. The Hamilton County Board of Education was listed as the Defendant or Appellee. Although these two parties were the only two listed parties specifically in the court case, there were over twenty witnesses and experts called to testify in this court case as well as over thousands of pages of documents, and hours of taped videos were entered as exhibits (Find Law, 2012).
In 1997, Zachary Deal was



References: Find Law. (2012). Deal v. Hamilton County BD. Of Educ. 03-5396. Retrieved from http://caselaw.findlaw.com/summary/opinion/us-6th-circuit/2004/12/16/127294.html Mayerson, G. (2012). Analysis of Zachary Deal v. Hamilton County Department of Education . Retrieved from http://www.wrightslaw.com/advoc/articles/autism.deal.mayerson.analysis.htm Osborne, A. G., & Russo, C. J. (2007). Special Education and The Law: A Guide for Practitioners (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Southwest Autism Research and Resource Center. (2012). What is the definition of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Retrieved from http://autismcenter.org/autism_faq.aspx#q1 Wrights Law. (2012). United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circut. Retrieved from http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/caselaw/04/6th.deal.hamilton.tn.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    C. Karen K. Wadle v. Frank W. Jones and City of Des Moines, Iowa 312 N.W.2d 510 (1981)…

    • 4440 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Breaking down the case being highlighted here, Christine Franklin was a sophomore at North Gwinnett High School back in 1986. While attending that year, she claimed to have been sexually harassed by Andrew Hill, who was a coach at the school. Franklin claimed sexual activity was unsolicited and that Hill forced her into such acts. Hill was accused of engaging her in sexual conversation, in which he asked her of her experiences with her boyfriend and if she would consider having intercourse with an older man. Hill was stated to have kissed her forcefully, calling her at home, asking her to meet him socially, asking other teachers to have her excused from their classes. Most notably, he took her into a private office and subjected her to coercive intercourse.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A considerable number of children who were the plaintiffs of African American descent were deprived of access to public schools based on their race. The litigants mainly wanted to contest the segregation doctrine applied to them in southern states and allow them to choose any school of their choice without being discriminated against racial lines.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I am writing this paper on the court case of Hudson District School vs. Rowley. I will discuss those involved in the case, what issues brought this case to trial, how and when the case was adjudicated, and the final outcome of the trial. I will also tell how I feel about this case and what it accomplished for the education system. Every student has the right to have an individual education plan (IEP). Although all students with disabilities are entitled to an IEP that does not necessarily mean they are eligible for every form of technology available to them. IEP are designed to keep children with disabilities as current as those students without disabilities. Amy Rowley did in fact have an individualized education plan, but her parents believed she was entitled to more. Hendrick Hudson vs. Rowley was the first U.S. Supreme Court’s trial under the Education for All Handicapped Children which is now known as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, (IDEA).…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zachary Deal Case Study

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The school board was accused of predetermining not to offer Zachary ABA on any level, regardless of how beneficial it was which violated IDEA (United States Court of Appeals, 2009). Additionally, Zachary 's parents were not fully involved in the IEP process which deprived Zachary a FAPE. At one IEP meeting Zachary 's parents were informed that they were not allowed to ask any question which goes completely against parental rights (County Schools, 2005). The IEP meetings also failed to have a general education teacher present. The Deals began their administrative hearing in March of 2000. In October of 2001 they initiated a review of portions of the ALJ 's decision in district court. Finally in December of 2004 the courts decided a verdict. The decision had been made to reimburse the Deals 's with the money they had spent on private ABA and related services (United States Court of Appeals, 2009). Sadly, it took years in court and an estimated 2,2850,000 to defend a relatively small reimbursement claim (County Schools,…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Harris v. Coweta County, No. 03-15094, 433 F.3d 807 (11th Cir. 2005), cert. granted sub nom., Scott v. Harris, 127 S. Ct. 468 (2006)…

    • 3453 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Irving Independent Sch Dist v. Amber Tatro, 468 U.S. 883 (1984) - Special Education Cases - Wrightslaw." Wrightslaw Special Education Law and Advocacy. Web. 19 May 2011. <http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/caselaw/ussupct.tatro.htm>.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a town named Vernonia, Oregon, the local public schools faced a major problem regarding the drug use of students while participating in high school athletics (3). The Vernonia School Board were disturbed that drug use increases the risk of sports-related injury (4), so they approved an anti-drug policy, the Student Athlete Drug Policy, which requires random drug testing of the school’s student athletes (5). However, this became a conflict with the parents of a child named James Acton. The parents refused to sign a consent form to allow their kid to take the drug test because they felt it went against the 4th Amendment’s prohibition against “unreasonable” searches (6). The case was dismissed in the Federal District Court and was appealed to the Court of Appeals for the 9th District (7). This court favored the Acton families’ complaint, but random drug testing in public schools was ruled allowable in 1988 in Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin (8). The case went on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to conclude conflicting court decisions (9).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Brief

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This civil court case takes place in a West Virginia school system located in Taylor County, when a general education high school history teacher failed to follow an IEP for Douglas Devart. During the case Devart and his parents Robert and Virginia ended up using aliases by the names of John Doe, Jane Doe and son D.D. Doe as a deterrent from the public so the family would not endure any additional embarrassment, slander, and/or liable regarding the son’s handicap. The defendants of this case were D.D.’s history teacher Michael Withers, Principal Greg Cartwright, Superintendent Wendell Teets and the Taylor County Board of Education. The following is a sequence of events that happened in chronological order that led up to the trial. Plaintiff D. D. was diagnosed as having a learning disability in the fourth grade while attending Anna Jarvis School in Taylor County. At that time he had been put on an Individual Educational Program (a.k.a. IEP) designed to accommodate his learning disability as required by Public Law 94-142 and implementing federal regulations, 34 C.F.R. 300.130 and implementing State Policy No. 2419, Section 1.3, 1.4 and 2.11, because of his learning disability D.D.’s educational program was adapted to provide oral testing by a learning disabilities teacher in a learning disabilities resource classroom. This accommodation was regularly provided at Anna Jarvis School and Grafton Middle School.…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandra Jones

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. The court that heard the case in the attached file was Kevin M.V. Whitaker, of the Superior court of Justice, date March 23 2011, with reasons reported at 2011 ONSC 1475, 333 D.L.R (4TH) 566.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brown vs. Board of Education

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages

    "'The Supreme Court decision [on Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas] is the greatest victory for the Negro people since the Emancipation Proclamation,' Harlem's Amsterdam News exclaimed. ‘It will alleviate troubles in many other fields.' The Chicago Defender added, ‘this means the beginning of the end of the dual society in American life and the system…of segregation which supports it.'"…

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Findlaw. Supreme court of south carolina. The state of south carolina, respondent v brent hornsby, appellant (1997). Retrieved from http://caselaw.findlaw.com/sc-supreme-court/1347612.html…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High School and Act

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    8. Brian Stecher and Laura Hamilton. Working Smarter to Leave No Child Behind: Practical Insights for School Leaders. Rand, 2003…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This case has a similar background to those of the assignment. The original action is based in 1962 in the city of Jackson, Mississippi. In that lawsuit, Clark v. Thompson, 206 F. Supp. 539 (SD Miss. 1962), the…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays