ENG 125
Instructor: Macy Dailey
September 05, 2011
This paper focuses on the similarities and differences of the representation of death and the impermanence in the short story “A Father’s Story” by Andre Dubus, and the poem “Because I could not stop for Death” by Emily Dickinson.” The reader finds two authors who are different, but produces a mental picture of death in the short story and poem. In “A Father’s Story” the main character in the story is the father who ignores his religious belief in order to protect his daughter from the consequences of killing a man with her car. However, in the poem “Because I could not stop for Death,” the author displays how the main character accepted death as a friend and a part of life until the end. The short story discuss the character’s life before it yields into the talk of death; however, the poem talks of death right at the beginning of the poem. The two pieces of literature imply an acceptance of the inevitability of death by both authors. Death, in these two pieces of literature, is more than just absence of the soul from the body. In the poem and the short story, there are three types of death experiences represented: emotional death, spiritual death, and physical death. Exploring these different kinds of death experiences shows similarities and differences between the two pieces of literature. The inevitability of death and the emotions involved are described in both of these pieces. “A Father’s Story” begins describing the life of the Catholic character Luke Ripley, or what remains of it after losing his wife and children to an obviously bitter divorce. This represents the emotional death experience in the short story. He describes the feeling of loneliness and pain of being in the house all alone with no family. He explains the aggravation in knowing that, being a catholic, he could not fill that void in his life with love of another woman because his faith teaches that he can’t marry twice. He goes on and on about how good life was in the days when he and his wife Gloria were together and his family was intact. He speaks as if the life, hope, and simplicity of life left with his wife and children in that U-Haul all those years ago. Luke is dead emotionally and lives with the regret that his marriage didn’t work and he had to stay single for the rest of his life. He confessed to the sin of fornication, which he openly admitted he willingly committed on two different occasions with two different women whom he did not love (as if love matters in the case of a lonely, divorced, Catholic man). Luke’s emotional death is triggered not by the divorce or the lack of a family life, but by the Catholic dogma that once divorced, a Catholic believer can’t remarry, which eliminated all hope of loving again or picking up the broken pieces of his life and moving on happily with someone else. Luke’s emotional death is seen as clearly as his sharp sense of self-awareness throughout this short story. Luke later describes the frustrations of trying to live up to the expectations of being a “true Catholic (Clugston, 2010).” He explains that being a true Catholic is too hard and how he has never come across real saintliness, giving the synopsis that until the pope sells his house and everything in it, he would never respect a pope. He struggles trying to balance concentration in mass at St. John’s Church and thinking about what other things are going on outside the church. This represents spiritual death experience in the short story. Conversely to the open confession that being a real Catholic is too hard, it is obvious that he, because of ritual praying and habitual talking to God every morning that he has some kind of interest in knowing God on a personal level but because of the spiritual ineptitude, he is unable to live up to the standards that the Catholic church has set for the religion of Catholicism. His companionship with Father Paul (who is the priest over St. John’s Church and the man who keeps Luke Company since his family left him) is at risk because of Luke’s longing to love. He has a burning desire inside him to love and to be loved and that goes against what Father Paul and the Catholic Church teaches. Luke’s longing to love despite what he’s been taught to believe shows that he is spiritually dead because if he was spiritually alive and connected with the Spirit of God, he would obey the statutes that his religion teaches. In fact, at the end of the story when he vocalizes God speaking to him, Luke gets bitter with God and says to God that if one of his sons would have come over due to the same circumstances that he would have met him at the crime scene with an ambulance. When God asks him why, he mocks Almighty God by saying essentially that any man could stand to see his son in pain and could stand there with pride as he took the whip and nails. He says with sarcasm that if God would have had a daughter, He couldn’t have borne her passion (as if to say God doesn’t know what it feels like to have a daughter). As God tells Luke that he loves in weakness, Luke defensively snaps back by saying, “…as you love me (Clugston, 2010).” This shows us that Luke, in fact, is spiritually dead because he is unable to recognize with whom he is speaking. A visit from Luke’s daughter Jennifer, who comes home to visit her father more than any of her brothers, reveals that Jennifer had just caused the physical death of a stranger. A night out drinking with friends became a tragic experience for Jennifer in the short story. Once Jennifer dropped her friends’ home, she drove through the hills toward her father’s house and she hit something that seemed to be a person. Upon her return home, Jennifer awakes her father to tell him of the accident. Luke calms his daughter down and tries to understand what has happened to her. She gives graphic detail about her driving experience including details about the weather before finally admitting to hitting something, or someone for that matter. Luke, being a seriously concerned and probably intoxicated father, goes out to the scene where Jennifer described the accident. He finds that it was a man that was hit by Jennifer and he was, in fact, dead. This is the physical death experience represented in this story. Luke seems to have a bigger respect for the physical death because he described himself as highly emotional when he sees that guy lying on the ground, face-down with one arm close to his body and his other arm extended from his shoulders. The description of the dead man was detailed so that without going any further, the reader could deduce that the guy was surely dead. Luke describes the guy as not having a pulse or heartbeat, having blood leaking from his mouth, and upon ear-to-chest listening, Luke describes the young man as having a gurgling water and air sound in his chest for a moment. The description of the young man was the description of physical death. The poem “Because I Could Not Stop for Death” opens by acknowledging the anonymity of death. There is an absence of emotion from the character because of the uncontrolled nature of death. The character who speaks from death is emotionally dead because there is no use for emotions in death. The character in the poem didn’t cry, mourn, or lament one time but spoke in a tone of acceptance to the inevitability of death. In the absence of emotions, the character spoke clearly on how she felt being dead. This represents the emotional death experience in this poem. The character speaks of having to put away her labor and leisure, passing the school where the children played at recess, and passing the fields of gazing grain. She speaks from her own perspective and not once did she expound on any emotional feelings toward what she saw as she passed those places. The character, instead, imputes those emotions on the reader and the reader can feel what the character would feel about what was seen if she wasn’t dead. The character almost pulls the emotions out of the reader. There is a simple sense of hopelessness at the end of the poem when the author explains that the only stop they made was the stop at the grave plot which she describes as a house that seemed like a swelling of the ground. She explains that it has been centuries since they stopped there and yet each century seems shorter than the day she first concluded that she was riding through time and into eternity. She speaks with a tone of hopelessness because she obviously believes that where she is now is where she will always be. She describes her grave plot as a house, implying that she was now at her new home. There is no mention of God or any belief in a higher power in this poem, as opposed to the short story. Any believer in God knows that death and the grave are merely conduits through which we pass from this life here on earth to the eternal life in Heaven or Hell, but to the character in this poem, the grave is where the buck stops. There is no hint of faith or belief in God or hope in the Resurrection from the grave which signifies the spiritual death experience in this poem. The author doesn’t speak of anything other than the grave as the ultimate resting place. The character says that each passing century is not as long as the day she realized that the horses were navigating her into eternity as if she dreaded that day that she’d be escorted into eternity by this undeniable gentleman caller. The character, however creative she is in describing it, is dead. The entire poem is based on the inevitable death of the character. This represents the physical death experience. The poem doesn’t get into detail about when, where, or how the character died but the final point of the poem was that the character, in fact, had actually died and was speaking first-hand about her physical death experience, which was decorated and glazed with a wonderful word play. She explains in the first stanza that “…the carriage held but just ourselves and immortality (Clugston, 2010).” This verse implies the solitude of the physical death experience and the fact that death is a lonely experience meant for one person at a time. It implies that physical death has no room for things accumulated in time by man and once death comes for a person, that person can’t take anything on the “carriage ride to eternity (Clugston, 2010).” The character has a sense of respect for death. Seeing as how she can’t do anything about being dead anyway, she has no choice but to respect the arrival of her eternal escort. Physical death is the most apparent experience in this poem and is the biggest part of the dissection of what the poem really represents or means. The two pieces of literature “A Father’s Story” and “Because I Could Not Stop for Death” both have some of the same tones and experiences by the characters. Though the differences in length are blindingly apparent, the meanings of both of these pieces of literature are similar in that by the conclusion of both of them; the reader will have acquired a mental picture of what death actually is and ultimately how inevitable death really is. The differences in the emotional death experiences in the two pieces of literature are clear in that the character in the short story once knew emotional awakening until his wife divorced him and left with the kids in a U-Haul. That experience was followed by the emotional death experience for Luke because he was a Catholic man taught to believe that he could never love or marry again after having married before. In the poem, the reader has to assume that the character knew emotional vitality at some point in her life because the poem opens with “Because I could not stop for death… (Clugston, 2010)” implies that the character was enjoying her life. The fact that she couldn’t stop for death meant that she was too busy enjoying life and that she was enjoying it to the fullest. She later says how she had to “…put away my labor and my leisure too, for this civility (Clugston, 2010).” She had to stop enjoying the labors and leisure of life when death came for her. The differences in the spiritual death experiences in these two pieces are also apparent because in the short story, Luke, although he confessed to not be a “real catholic (Smith, 2007),” he still practiced some of the principles of the Catholic faith in that he followed the principle of marrying only once. He deemed the Catholic lifestyle “unable to be lived, (Smith 2007)” in so many words. He was spiritually dead because although he wanted to find fulfillment the right way, at the end of the story he argues in arrogance with the very God who never spoke to him until that point. At the end of the story when he could hear God speaking to him, he insulted God by saying that He loved Luke in weakness. This was the seal that Luke was spiritually dead. On the other hand, in the poem, the character not once mentioned God or a belief in Him (or any deity for that matter) and the reader is left in the gray area on whether or not the character had any spiritual vitality before or after death. The reader, again, can only assume that because she failed to mention anything of faith that she had none. This can be very misleading because even though no deity is mentioned, the reader still has to consider the fact that she mentions “eternity (Dickerson, 2011).” Eternity is forever in the absence of time but the author doesn’t say where she is spending eternity. She only mentions that with each passing century, nothing is longer than the day she realized that her carriage ride was into eternity. The differences in the physical death experiences are noticed because in the short story, the cause of death is obvious because Luke’s daughter hit the guy with her car. The reader has an explanation as to how death came to that boy in the short story. Luke actually considers that he could have possibly done something to postpone that boy’s death. He reasoned that if he had called an ambulance to meet him up there on the scene of the accident, the boy could have had a better chance at living. In the poem, the reader has no idea as to how the character died or where she was. What she was doing at the time of death was even a mystery because she just said that she had to put away her labor and leisure for death. All of these experiences are different in both the pieces of literature. In conclusion, when we as people think about death, we think only about the physical death experience. Death is all around us, even in living things. There may be some people among us on this earth living alright from a physical standpoint, but are emotionally or spiritually dead inside. For some, death is an escape from the responsibilities, burdens, trials, and tribulations of life and is looked at as a deserved rest in between time on earth and eternity somewhere else. The fact still remains that some of us are already spiritually, and emotionally dead, waiting for our physical lives to end.
References
Clugston, R. W. (2010), Stories of Comparison, ch.8, Journey into Literature, Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUENG125.10.2/sections/h1.2
Clugston, R. W. (2010), Poems for Comparison, ch.12, Journey into Literature, Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUENG125.10.2/sections/h1.2
Dickinson, E. (2011), Shmoop University, Inc., Poetry, Because I could not stop for Death, Retrieved from http://www.shmoop.com/because-i-could-not-stop-for-death/themes.html
Smith, V. (2007), Character analysis: Luke Ripley, A Father’s Story, by Andre Dubus, Helium: American Literature, Retrieved from http://www.helium.com/items/283992-character-analysis-luke-ripley-a-fathers-story-by-andre-dubus
References: Clugston, R. W. (2010), Stories of Comparison, ch.8, Journey into Literature, Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUENG125.10.2/sections/h1.2 Clugston, R. W. (2010), Poems for Comparison, ch.12, Journey into Literature, Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUENG125.10.2/sections/h1.2 Dickinson, E. (2011), Shmoop University, Inc., Poetry, Because I could not stop for Death, Retrieved from http://www.shmoop.com/because-i-could-not-stop-for-death/themes.html Smith, V. (2007), Character analysis: Luke Ripley, A Father’s Story, by Andre Dubus, Helium: American Literature, Retrieved from http://www.helium.com/items/283992-character-analysis-luke-ripley-a-fathers-story-by-andre-dubus
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
“Because I could not stop for Death” by Emily Dickinson, was first published in 1862. Dickinson was known for writing poetry mainly about death. When we think about death, we imagine something terrifying, but in this poem it is seen in a different perspective. In the poem, the speaker comes upon death, but not in a scary or bad way. Yet, death has approached her in a gentleman-like way. In this poem it’s talked about as a kind human being, who is simply taking her along a journey around town and death is just a stop away. While reading the poem we believe that the speaker is going to her death bed but once we reach the last stanza of the poem, we are left in quite a surprise.…
- 796 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the short story, “The Father”, by Hugh Garner, the father transitions from selfish ignorance to a painful realization. John…
- 267 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In this text there are two parallel – running storylines, the father who tells the story and the real act…
- 499 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
During his childhood, the son faces exposure from two very different parents. One of which believes in the preservation of life and moral values, whereas the mother believes in self-destruction and inconsideration towards everyone. Overall, the father has the most profound impact upon the son. Through their southward journey, the father and son share several successful and horrible experiences together. Throughout occasions such as narrowly escaping death from cannibals and plundering an underground bunker, the father and son have grown a strong, loving bond. Unfortunately, this developing relationship does not last forever, due to the father’s terminal illness. After his inevitable death, a stranger graciously offers salvation to the lost son. This salvation comes in the form of a loving, holy community that graciously takes the son in as their own. The 8-year-old boy, manages the unthinkable – survival. The son owes his survival entirely to his father. In a post-apocalyptic world where resources are few and far between, protecting the son from all levels of threats, so that the son can one day become self-sufficient, is nothing short of…
- 2407 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
What is a father? A father is someone who is more than just a person who created you. A father is a person who should be a mentor to you and helps guide you through life. What isn't a father is one who simply puts their children aside to live their own lives and have no part in their children's life and growth. The stories I will be contrasting are "The Last Game," by Jan Weiner and "Reunion," by John Cheever. My first reason of contrast is that in "Last Game," the relationship between characters Jan Weiner and his father is that of mutual admiration in which the son had great respect for his, his pride and braveness of choice which is contrasted in "Reunion," as the son Charlie has feelings of disdain for his a father in that his father's actions were disappointing, disgraceful and selfish. My second reason of contrast is in "Last Game," Jan Weiner's father is dealing with political problems in that he lived in the time of the holocaust and was Jewish, consistently chased by Nazi's who forced him to make a tough decision on suicide as opposed to dying the Nazi way which is contrasted in "Reunion," where the father is dealing with psychological problems in that he is a drunk who's very obnoxious with an abusive mentality. My last reason of contrast of contrast is in "Last Game," there is a strong bond between Jan and his father where their sense of family was strong and they had a deep understanding for each other is contrasted in "Reunion," as there was a lack of a bond due to the father's arrogance and bad personality. I chose these three reasons because I believe they represent and answer the questions what is and isn't a father.…
- 1398 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
A relationship between a father and son can be strong or weak. Maus by Art Spiegelman and Night by Elie Wiesel show great examples of a father-son bond. In Maus, Spiegelman, the author documents the history of his father’s survival through the Holocaust. In Night, Wiesel, the author faced the Holocaust with his father. Both stories talk about the suffering and pain the author and father may have face paced. In some cases, it brought them together or pushed them farther apart.…
- 640 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The short story “Reunion” describes the last meeting between a son and his father. It incorporates humor, pathos, and grotesque in a blend that leaves readers unsure of the character of the father, and whether or not the boy is better off with or without him.…
- 495 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
By tying the tale of this family, and the part each person plays in the story, together with notes from family therapy, Schectman easily paints a picture for the reader to see how quietly and without notice fathers can become emotionally absent in a fractured family relationship. She takes this a step further by describing the real emotions and actions that the other family members endure and the benign actions that lead up to the “wicked step-child” and…
- 582 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Emily Dickinson, a chief figure in American literature, wrote hundreds of poems in her lifetime using unusual syntax and form. Several if not all her poems revolved around themes of nature, illness, love, and death. Dickinson’s poem, Because I could not stop for Death, a lyric with a jarring volta conflates several themes with an air of ambiguity leaving multiple interpretations open for analysis. Whether death is a lover and immortality their chaperone, a deceiver and seducer of the speaker to lead her to demise, or a timely truth of life, literary devices such as syntax, selection of detail, and diction throughout the poem support and enable these different understandings to stand alone.…
- 113 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
To conclude, through the portrayal of the Father and Son, the author illustrated the influence of paternal bond, death, and trust immensely. This helps depict the life one day we may have in store for…
- 438 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“Any man can be a father, but it takes a special person to be a dad.” There are some people who do not have the opportunity to have a father in their life. Someone they can call dad. Like the men in the work’s “Daddy” Sylvia Plath and “My Papa’s Waltz” by Theodore Roethke. A similarity of the works is that that the fathers were admired by their children. In contrast, In “Daddy” the fathers was abusive and in “My Papa’s Waltz” the father wasn’t abusive towards the son.…
- 528 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In this paper I have been asked to compare and contrast literary works involving the topic of my choosing. For this paper I chose the topic of death. Death can be told in many different ways, and looked at the same. This paper is going to decide how you feel about death, is it a lonely long road that ends in sorrow, or a happy journey that ends at the heart of the soul? You decide as we take different literary works to determine which way you may feel.…
- 2565 Words
- 11 Pages
Better Essays -
If the author was able to expand on his writings to fulfill a request of mine I would prefer to hear more about his father’s life before marriage. His father clearly had faults but what drove him into that personality. The character’s father was an alcoholic but still strived to better the life of his…
- 367 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
There is a multitude of poems written with the theme of death, be it in a positive light or negative. Some poets write poems that depict Death as a spine-chilling inevitable end, others hold respect for this natural occurrence. In Emily Dickinson’s poem “Because I could not stop for Death”, diction and personification is utilized to demonstrate the speaker’s cordial friendship with Death.…
- 429 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Death is a constant presence in life that can not be escaped and is experienced by everyone. Dylan Thomas’s “Do not go gentle into that good night” and Emily Dickinson’s “Because I could not stop for Death” and both deal with different perspectives of death. Thomas’s poem looks at death from an external perspective of watching a person die where Dickinson’s poem looks at death through the perspective of a person experiencing death. These perspectives on death show the acceptance of death and eternity and death and disparity of life ending.…
- 653 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays